-
Tytuł:
-
Comparison of antimicrobial resistance in thermophilic Campylobacter strains isolated from conventional production and backyard poultry flocks.
-
Autorzy:
-
Dias TS; Post-graduation Program in Veterinary Medicine (Veterinary Hygiene and Processing Technology of Animal Products), Faculty of Veterinary, Fluminense Federal University (UFF), Brazil.
Nascimento RJ; Post-graduation Program in Veterinary Medicine (Veterinary Hygiene and Processing Technology of Animal Products), Faculty of Veterinary, Fluminense Federal University (UFF), Brazil.
Machado LS; Post-graduation Program in Veterinary Medicine (Veterinary Hygiene and Processing Technology of Animal Products), Faculty of Veterinary, Fluminense Federal University (UFF), Brazil.
Abreu DLC; Post-graduation Program in Veterinary Medicine (Veterinary Hygiene and Processing Technology of Animal Products), Faculty of Veterinary, Fluminense Federal University (UFF), Brazil.; Public Health Department, Faculty of Veterinary, Fluminense Federal University (UFF), Brazil.
do Nascimento ER; Post-graduation Program in Veterinary Medicine (Veterinary Hygiene and Processing Technology of Animal Products), Faculty of Veterinary, Fluminense Federal University (UFF), Brazil.; Public Health Department, Faculty of Veterinary, Fluminense Federal University (UFF), Brazil.
Pereira VLA; Post-graduation Program in Veterinary Medicine (Veterinary Hygiene and Processing Technology of Animal Products), Faculty of Veterinary, Fluminense Federal University (UFF), Brazil.; Public Health Department, Faculty of Veterinary, Fluminense Federal University (UFF), Brazil.
de Aquino MHC; Post-graduation Program in Veterinary Medicine (Veterinary Hygiene and Processing Technology of Animal Products), Faculty of Veterinary, Fluminense Federal University (UFF), Brazil.; Public Health Department, Faculty of Veterinary, Fluminense Federal University (UFF), Brazil.
-
Źródło:
-
British poultry science [Br Poult Sci] 2021 Apr; Vol. 62 (2), pp. 188-192. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Dec 04.
-
Typ publikacji:
-
Journal Article
-
Język:
-
English
-
Imprint Name(s):
-
Publication: 2001- : Abingdon, Oxford : Taylor & Francis
Original Publication: Edinburgh.
-
MeSH Terms:
-
Campylobacter*
Campylobacter Infections*/drug therapy
Campylobacter Infections*/epidemiology
Campylobacter Infections*/veterinary
Campylobacter coli*
Campylobacter jejuni*
Animals ; Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology ; Brazil ; Chickens ; Drug Resistance, Bacterial ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests/veterinary ; Poultry
-
Contributed Indexing:
-
Keywords: antimicrobial resistance; backyard poultry; fluoroquinolone; microbiology; thermophilic Campylobacter
-
Substance Nomenclature:
-
0 (Anti-Bacterial Agents)
-
Entry Date(s):
-
Date Created: 20201007 Date Completed: 20210301 Latest Revision: 20210301
-
Update Code:
-
20240105
-
DOI:
-
10.1080/00071668.2020.1833302
-
PMID:
-
33026245
-
1. The aim of this study was to compare the resistance pattern of thermophilic Campylobacter spp. isolated from conventional production (n = 34) and backyard poultry flocks (n = 36) from Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil. The disc diffusion method and statistical tests were used for investigation and analysis of the resistance pattern of Campylobacter spp. isolated from different rearing systems.2. Antimicrobial resistance percentages to amoxycillin with clavulanic acid (AMC), ampicillin (AMP), ceftiofur (CTF), ciprofloxacin (CIP), enrofloxacin (ENO), erythromycin (ERI), gentamicin (GEN) and tetracycline (TET) were 32.4%, 44.1%, 67.6%, 97.1%, 82.4%, 26.5%, 5.9% and 38.2% in conventional production flocks respectively, while the backyard flock's resistance levels were 0.0%, 13.9%, 69.4%, 100.0%, 91.7%, 5.6%, 0.0% and 16.7%, respectively.3. Campylobacter spp. from conventional poultry production was more resistant to AMC, AMO, ERI and TET (P > 0.05) when compared to strains from backyard poultry. A higher frequency of resistance to fluoroquinolones (FLQ), CIP and ENO, was observed in strains from both systems, demonstrating the spread of resistant strains among poultry production environments.
