-
Tytuł:
-
Discriminative power of an adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 applied to Brazilian older adults.
-
Autorzy:
-
Sugaya MC; Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Maio R; Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Soares BLM; Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Calado CKM; Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Morais GQ; Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Arruda IKG; Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Burgos MGPA; Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.
-
Źródło:
-
Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil) [Einstein (Sao Paulo)] 2020 Oct 23; Vol. 18, pp. eAO5309. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Oct 23 (Print Publication: 2020).
-
Typ publikacji:
-
Journal Article
-
Język:
-
English; Portuguese
-
Imprint Name(s):
-
Original Publication: São Paulo, SP : Instituto de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein
-
MeSH Terms:
-
Malnutrition*/diagnosis
Malnutrition*/epidemiology
Nutrition Assessment*
Aged ; Brazil ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Geriatric Assessment ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Nutritional Status ; Risk Assessment
-
References:
-
Nutr Hosp. 2007 Nov-Dec;22(6):702-9. (PMID: 18051996)
Clin Nutr. 2016 Oct;35(5):1053-8. (PMID: 26231340)
Nutr Hosp. 2012 Nov-Dec;27(6):2015-9. (PMID: 23588453)
Nutr Rev. 1996 Jan;54(1 Pt 2):S59-65. (PMID: 8919685)
J Clin Nurs. 2011 Aug;20(15-16):2144-52. (PMID: 21535274)
Nutr Hosp. 2014 Sep 01;30(3):636-42. (PMID: 25238842)
Clin Nutr. 2003 Aug;22(4):415-21. (PMID: 12880610)
Prim Care. 1994 Mar;21(1):55-67. (PMID: 8197257)
Clin Nutr. 2019 Feb;38(1):10-47. (PMID: 30005900)
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1985 Feb;33(2):116-20. (PMID: 3968366)
Clin Nutr. 2006 Jun;25(3):409-17. (PMID: 16356595)
Clin Nutr. 2017 Feb;36(1):49-64. (PMID: 27642056)
Nutr Hosp. 2014 Feb 01;29(2):427-36. (PMID: 24528364)
JAMA. 1994 Jan 5;271(1):54-8. (PMID: 8258889)
-
Entry Date(s):
-
Date Created: 20201028 Date Completed: 20201029 Latest Revision: 20220110
-
Update Code:
-
20240105
-
PubMed Central ID:
-
PMC8639137
-
DOI:
-
10.31744/einstein_journal/2020AO5309
-
PMID:
-
33111808
-
Objective: To investigate the discriminative power of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002.
Methods: A cross sectional study involving one hundred participants aged ≥60 years. The original and adapted versions of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 and the Mini Nutritional Assessment were used. Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 adaptation consisted of a lower age cutoff (60 years or older) for addition of one extra point to the final score.
Results: Screening using Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 revealed higher nutritional risk among patients aged ≥70 years (p=0.009), whereas screening using the adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 revealed similar nutritional risk in both age groups (60-69 years and ≥70 years; p=0.117). Frequency of nutritional risk was highest when the Mini Nutritional Assessment was administered (52.7%), followed by the adapted and original versions of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (35.5% and 29.1%, respectively).
Conclusion: The adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 was more effective than the original version. However, further studies are needed to confirm these findings.