Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

Interspecific grafting between Gossypium hirsutum, G. barbadense and G. herbaceum lines.

Tytuł:
Interspecific grafting between Gossypium hirsutum, G. barbadense and G. herbaceum lines.
Autorzy:
Karaca M; Department of Field Crops, Faculty of Agriculture, Akdeniz University, 07059, Antalya, Turkey. .
Ince AG; Vocational School of Technical Sciences, Akdeniz University, 07059, Antalya, Turkey.
Reddy UK; Department of Biology, West Virginia State University, Institute, WV, 25112, USA.
Źródło:
Scientific reports [Sci Rep] 2020 Oct 29; Vol. 10 (1), pp. 18649. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Oct 29.
Typ publikacji:
Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Język:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Original Publication: London : Nature Publishing Group, copyright 2011-
MeSH Terms:
Gossypium/*genetics
Cotyledon/growth & development ; Gossypium/classification ; Gossypium/growth & development ; Plant Leaves/growth & development ; Plant Roots/growth & development ; Seedlings/growth & development ; Species Specificity
References:
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2005 Aug;8(4):369-77. (PMID: 15939667)
PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e30056. (PMID: 22253876)
Science. 2010 May 14;328(5980):872-5. (PMID: 20413459)
J Hered. 2014 Nov-Dec;105(6):834-6. (PMID: 25160847)
Front Plant Sci. 2014 Dec 17;5:727. (PMID: 25566298)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Feb 14;109(7):2434-8. (PMID: 22308367)
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 16;8(4):e61995. (PMID: 23614002)
J Exp Bot. 2013 Nov;64(16):4851-62. (PMID: 24006424)
Science. 2009 May 1;324(5927):649-51. (PMID: 19407205)
J Plant Physiol. 2012 Mar 1;169(4):327-35. (PMID: 22154601)
J Plant Res. 2018 Jan;131(1):49-58. (PMID: 29181647)
Plant Signal Behav. 2006 Jul;1(4):179-84. (PMID: 19521483)
Anal Biochem. 2005 Aug 15;343(2):353-5. (PMID: 16054884)
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):e0190032. (PMID: 29272298)
Plant Mol Biol. 2009 Mar;69(4):473-88. (PMID: 19083153)
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Dec 11;9:1806. (PMID: 30619391)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Sep 11;104(37):14741-6. (PMID: 17785412)
BMC Plant Biol. 2013 Oct 02;13:147. (PMID: 24083813)
J Exp Bot. 2008;59(6):1295-304. (PMID: 18375935)
Science. 2007 Oct 5;318(5847):113-6. (PMID: 17916738)
Plant Cell Rep. 1997 Jun;16(9):647-652. (PMID: 30727612)
PLoS One. 2013 May 07;8(5):e63534. (PMID: 23667634)
Plant Physiol. 2012 Jul;159(3):984-1000. (PMID: 22582134)
J Nematol. 1974 Jan;6(1):17-20. (PMID: 19319358)
BMC Plant Biol. 2020 Feb 27;20(1):88. (PMID: 32103722)
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20201030 Date Completed: 20210329 Latest Revision: 20210329
Update Code:
20240105
PubMed Central ID:
PMC7596078
DOI:
10.1038/s41598-020-75679-1
PMID:
33122752
Czasopismo naukowe
Seedling grafting could provide additional crop improvement strategies for cotton. However, there existed limited studies on interspecific grafting and approaches. Four different grafting approaches were developed and compared between lines representing three of the four cultivated cotton species G. hirsutum, G. barbadense and G. herbaceum. Grafting approaches of this study focused on the cotyledon node and cotyledon leaves retained on scions, rootstocks, without cotyledon node and cotyledon leaves on scions and rootstocks or halved cotyledon node and single cotyledon leaf on scions and rootstocks. Evaluations of the grafting approaches were made by comparing survival and growth rate during the second and fifth weeks after transplantation, respectively. The formation of any lateral shoots at the grafted sites were studied in two of four grafting approaches in the first and the second year during flowering stage. DNA alterations due to grafting were investigated using microsatellite markers. There were no statistically significant differences between grafts and their control in survival rate and locus specific DNA alteration. Growth rate and lateral shoot formation, on the other hand, were different among grafting types and grafts. We concluded that grafting without cotyledon node and cotyledon leaves on rootstocks, and with cotyledon node but without cotyledon leaves on scions were easy to perform and suitable for interspecific cotton grafting. Results suggested that grafting seedlings and allowing time to heal graft wounds prior to spring transplanting or double cropping is suitable for wheat-cotton intercropping to prevent late or early chilling damage associated with seed sowing or conventional transplanting of susceptible seedlings. Furthermore, the rapid and consistent wound healing in seedling grafts along with lateral shoot formation occurring in two of four grafting approaches make them a suitable approach to investigate possible genetic and epigenetic movement between scions and rootstocks, especially across species.
Zaloguj się, aby uzyskać dostęp do pełnego tekstu.

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies