-
Tytuł:
-
Development and evaluation of the Directive and Nondirective Support Scale for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
-
Autorzy:
-
Zhang X; Department of Social Medicine and Health Education, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Zhang X; Department of Social Medicine and Health Education, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Wang F; Department of Social Medicine and Health Education, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Wu S; Department of Social Medicine and Health Education, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Hu K; Department of Social Medicine and Health Education, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Yusufu M; Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, China.
Sun X; Department of Social Medicine and Health Education, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Fisher EB; Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, North Carolina, USA.
-
Źródło:
-
International journal of nursing sciences [Int J Nurs Sci] 2020 Sep 24; Vol. 7 (4), pp. 453-459. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Sep 24 (Print Publication: 2020).
-
Typ publikacji:
-
Journal Article
-
Język:
-
English
-
Imprint Name(s):
-
Publication: [Beijing] : Chinese Nursing Association with production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.
Original Publication: Singapore : Elsevier (Singapore) Pte Ltd., [2014]-
-
References:
-
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008 Dec 1;65(23):2276-84. (PMID: 19020196)
Int J Med Educ. 2011 Jun 27;2:53-55. (PMID: 28029643)
Ann Behav Med. 2017 Dec;51(6):810-821. (PMID: 28417438)
BMC Public Health. 2012 Nov 28;12:1035. (PMID: 23190685)
Am Psychol. 2004 Nov;59(8):676-684. (PMID: 15554821)
J Clin Epidemiol. 2002 Jan;55(1):67-76. (PMID: 11781124)
Front Psychol. 2012 Mar 01;3:55. (PMID: 22403561)
Biol Psychiatry. 2003 Aug 1;54(3):216-26. (PMID: 12893098)
Ann Behav Med. 2011 Apr;41(2):252-63. (PMID: 21108032)
Int J Behav Med. 1997;4(2):131-44. (PMID: 16250735)
J Behav Med. 2012 Oct;35(5):492-9. (PMID: 21877174)
J Community Health Nurs. 2017 Jan-Mar;34(1):32-45. (PMID: 28156147)
Psychol Bull. 1990 Mar;107(2):238-46. (PMID: 2320703)
Diabetes Care. 1999 May;22(5):832-43. (PMID: 10332691)
Curr Diab Rep. 2012 Dec;12(6):769-81. (PMID: 22949135)
Respir Med. 2008 Nov;102(11):1545-55. (PMID: 18662868)
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jan;41(Suppl 1):S13-S27. (PMID: 29222373)
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019 Mar;34(3):480-487. (PMID: 30480332)
-
Grant Information:
-
P30 DK092926 United States DK NIDDK NIH HHS
-
Contributed Indexing:
-
Keywords: Diabetes mellitus; Directive support; Nondirective support; Patient preference; Self-management; Social support
-
Entry Date(s):
-
Date Created: 20201116 Latest Revision: 20220506
-
Update Code:
-
20240105
-
PubMed Central ID:
-
PMC7644558
-
DOI:
-
10.1016/j.ijnss.2020.09.007
-
PMID:
-
33195758
-
Objectives: This study aims to develop the Directive and Nondirective Support Scale for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes (DNSS-T2DM) to measure diabetes-specific support and patients' preference as well as evaluate the construct validity and reliability of the DNSS-T2DM.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Tongzhou District, Beijing, China from July to September 2015. A total of 474 participants who had been diagnosed as type 2 diabetes by physicians and completed the DNSS-T2DM were included. The original 11-item DNSS-T2DM contains five items on nondirective support (Items 1-5) and six items on directive support (Items 6-11). There were two parallel questions for each item with one to measure the preference for support (Preference part) and the other to measure the perception of support in reality (Reality part). The final DNSS-T2DM was determined based on the results of the exploratory factor analysis (EFA). The construct validity of the final DNSS-T2DM was evaluated by the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The reliability was evaluated by internal consistency with Cronbach's α coefficients.
Results: A final 7-item DNSS-T2DM loaded on 2 factors with four items representing nondirective support and three items representing directive support was determined based on the EFA. The CFA indicated a satisfactory construct validity. The internal consistency of the 7-item DNSS-T2DM as well as the nondirective support items was satisfactory with Cronbach's α ≥ 0.70.
Conclusions: Our study supported the validity and reliability of the 7-item DNSS-T2DM. Further studies on the application of the DNSS-T2DM in different settings and population are needed.
Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(© 2020 The authors.)
