Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

Using mouse cursor tracking to investigate online cognition: Preserving methodological ingenuity while moving toward reproducible science.

Tytuł:
Using mouse cursor tracking to investigate online cognition: Preserving methodological ingenuity while moving toward reproducible science.
Autorzy:
Schoemann M; Department of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Zellescher Weg, 17, 01069, Dresden, Germany. .; Department of Management, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. .
O'Hora D; School of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Dale R; Department of Communication, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Scherbaum S; Department of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Zellescher Weg, 17, 01069, Dresden, Germany.
Źródło:
Psychonomic bulletin & review [Psychon Bull Rev] 2021 Jun; Vol. 28 (3), pp. 766-787. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Dec 14.
Typ publikacji:
Journal Article; Systematic Review
Język:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Publication: <2013-> : [New York : Springer]
Original Publication: Austin, TX : Psychonomic Society, Inc., c1994-
MeSH Terms:
Cognition*
Neuropsychological Tests*
Psychomotor Performance*
Research Design*
User-Computer Interface*
Humans
References:
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2018 Oct;27(5):315-323. (PMID: 30581254)
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Feb;52(1):317-341. (PMID: 30963463)
Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 25;7:1832. (PMID: 27933012)
Exp Brain Res. 2015 Dec;233(12):3597-611. (PMID: 26341932)
Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 15;62(2):575-88. (PMID: 22542637)
Front Psychol. 2014 Dec 10;5:1436. (PMID: 25540632)
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Apr;71(4):949-964. (PMID: 28300478)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 13;115(11):2607-2612. (PMID: 29531092)
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Oct;50(5):2097-2110. (PMID: 29101661)
Nature. 2008 Jun 12;453(7197):869-78. (PMID: 18548064)
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Dec;49(6):2012-2030. (PMID: 28078571)
Mem Cognit. 2020 Apr;48(3):436-454. (PMID: 31721062)
J Appl Psychol. 2005 Jan;90(1):175-81. (PMID: 15641898)
Mem Cognit. 1975 May;3(3):267-76. (PMID: 21287072)
Front Nutr. 2018 May 22;5:43. (PMID: 29872661)
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 Feb;142(1):93-100. (PMID: 22612767)
Am Psychol. 2018 Jan;73(1):3-25. (PMID: 29345484)
Psychol Methods. 2012 Dec;17(4):551-66. (PMID: 22924598)
Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Feb;10(2):59-63. (PMID: 16406760)
Front Psychol. 2014 Nov 20;5:1315. (PMID: 25477841)
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Aug;50(4):1645-1656. (PMID: 29218588)
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Apr;143(2):534-47. (PMID: 23855496)
Front Psychol. 2011 Apr 20;2:59. (PMID: 21687437)
Neuropsychology. 2017 Nov;31(8):972-980. (PMID: 28933871)
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Oct;81(7):2538-2557. (PMID: 31691102)
Sci Transl Med. 2016 Jun 1;8(341):341ps12. (PMID: 27252173)
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Nov;7(6):632-8. (PMID: 26168122)
Psychol Sci. 2015 Feb;26(2):122-34. (PMID: 25515527)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 13;115(11):2600-2606. (PMID: 29531091)
Nat Neurosci. 2010 May;13(5):538-9. (PMID: 20348919)
Behav Res Methods. 2013 Mar;45(1):83-97. (PMID: 22806703)
Psychol Sci. 2012 May 1;23(5):524-32. (PMID: 22508865)
Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Aug;13(8):360-6. (PMID: 19647475)
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Oct;49(5):1652-1667. (PMID: 28646399)
Sci Rep. 2016 Feb 12;6:20740. (PMID: 26867497)
Psychophysiology. 2014 Nov;51(11):1061-71. (PMID: 25039563)
Psychol Bull. 2020 May;146(5):451-479. (PMID: 31944796)
Front Psychol. 2013 Oct 02;4:700. (PMID: 24109465)
Mem Cognit. 2007 Jan;35(1):15-28. (PMID: 17533876)
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 01;4:1. (PMID: 25554246)
Annu Rev Psychol. 2019 Jan 4;70:747-770. (PMID: 30089228)
J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 Jun;25(6):834-42. (PMID: 23469884)
Cognition. 2010 Jun;115(3):407-16. (PMID: 20227687)
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2008 Apr;18(2):223-7. (PMID: 18678252)
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Nov;7(6):585-94. (PMID: 26168115)
Psychol Sci. 2011 Nov;22(11):1359-66. (PMID: 22006061)
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Jan 10;1:0021. (PMID: 33954258)
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Oct;51(5):2356-2377. (PMID: 30684228)
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Jun;22(6):531-543. (PMID: 29731415)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jul 19;102(29):10393-8. (PMID: 15985550)
Hum Brain Mapp. 1999;8(2-3):109-14. (PMID: 10524601)
Behav Res Methods. 2010 Feb;42(1):226-41. (PMID: 20160302)
Exp Psychol. 2018 Jan;65(1):23-31. (PMID: 29415644)
Front Psychol. 2013 Nov 26;4:863. (PMID: 24324449)
Neuroimage. 1999 Nov;10(5):607-19. (PMID: 10547338)
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2008 Nov;137(4):673-90. (PMID: 18999360)
R Soc Open Sci. 2016 Jan 13;3(1):150547. (PMID: 26909182)
Science. 2015 Jun 26;348(6242):1422-5. (PMID: 26113702)
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2009 May;4(3):274-90. (PMID: 26158964)
Grant Information:
SFB 940/2 Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Contributed Indexing:
Keywords: Experimental design; Mouse cursor tracking; Process tracing; Response dynamics
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20201215 Date Completed: 20210723 Latest Revision: 20210723
Update Code:
20240104
PubMed Central ID:
PMC8219569
DOI:
10.3758/s13423-020-01851-3
PMID:
33319317
Czasopismo naukowe
Mouse cursor tracking has become a prominent method for characterizing cognitive processes, used in a wide variety of domains of psychological science. Researchers have demonstrated considerable ingenuity in the application of the approach, but the methodology has not undergone systematic analysis to facilitate the development of best practices. Furthermore, recent research has demonstrated effects of experimental design features on a number of mousetracking outcomes. We conducted a systematic review of the mouse-tracking literature to survey the reporting and spread of mouse variables (Cursor speed, Sampling rate, Training), physical characteristics of the experiments (Stimulus position, Response box position) and response requirements (Start procedure, Response procedure, Response deadline). This survey reveals that there is room for improvement in reporting practices, especially of subtler design features that researchers may have assumed would not impact research results (e.g., Cursor speed). We provide recommendations for future best practices in mouse-tracking studies and consider how best to standardize the mouse-tracking literature without excessively constraining the methodological flexibility that is essential to the field.

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies