Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

Virtual Urgent Care Quality and Safety in the Time of Coronavirus.

Tytuł:
Virtual Urgent Care Quality and Safety in the Time of Coronavirus.
Autorzy:
Smith SW
Tiu J
Caspers CG
Lakdawala VS
Koziatek CA
Swartz JL
Lee DC
Jamin CT
Femia RJ
Haines EJ
Źródło:
Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety [Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf] 2021 Feb; Vol. 47 (2), pp. 86-98. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Oct 16.
Typ publikacji:
Journal Article; Multicenter Study
Język:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Publication: 2017- : Amsterdam : Elsevier
Original Publication: Oakbrook Terrace, IL : Joint Commission Resources, c2005-
MeSH Terms:
Patient Safety*
Quality of Health Care*
Ambulatory Care/*standards
Ambulatory Care/*trends
COVID-19/*epidemiology
Telemedicine/*standards
Telemedicine/*trends
Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; New York/epidemiology ; Pandemics ; Retrospective Studies ; SARS-CoV-2
References:
Telemed J E Health. 2020 May;26(5):571-573. (PMID: 32275485)
J Emerg Med. 1988 May-Jun;6(3):249-54. (PMID: 2844883)
Telemed J E Health. 2020 Jul;26(7):850-852. (PMID: 32329659)
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Nov 1;178(11):1558-1560. (PMID: 30285050)
J Clin Virol. 2020 May;126:104345. (PMID: 32278298)
Bioethics. 2020 Jun;34(5):459-466. (PMID: 31770814)
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2012 Sep;50(8):781-7. (PMID: 22889059)
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 30;382(18):1679-1681. (PMID: 32160451)
Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Apr 1;60(7):1084-94. (PMID: 25516192)
Front Public Health. 2020 Apr 29;8:152. (PMID: 32411652)
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2014 Nov;52(9):958-63. (PMID: 25175899)
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Apr 15;6(2):e18811. (PMID: 32252023)
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 Jun;26(6):767-772. (PMID: 32304745)
J Emerg Med. 2012 Dec;43(6):1110-8. (PMID: 22674038)
J Telemed Telecare. 2006;12 Suppl 2:S45-50. (PMID: 16989674)
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Apr 17;69(15):458-464. (PMID: 32298251)
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Mar;66(3):452-458. (PMID: 29272029)
J Emerg Med. 2013 Aug;45(2):281-8. (PMID: 23352864)
J Healthc Risk Manag. 2017 Jul;37(1):10-15. (PMID: 28719089)
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Jun;44:468-469. (PMID: 32303410)
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Dec;37(12):1975-1982. (PMID: 30633674)
J Emerg Med. 2020 Oct;59(4):610-618. (PMID: 32737005)
Ann Emerg Med. 1986 Aug;15(8):911-5. (PMID: 3740576)
Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2019 Oct 19;21(11):41. (PMID: 31630276)
BETA. 1998 Jan;:6-8. (PMID: 11364978)
Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Aug;62(2):136-144.e1. (PMID: 23465554)
J Med Philos. 2005 Apr;30(2):189-206. (PMID: 16025852)
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20201228 Date Completed: 20210211 Latest Revision: 20210929
Update Code:
20240105
PubMed Central ID:
PMC7566682
DOI:
10.1016/j.jcjq.2020.10.001
PMID:
33358323
Czasopismo naukowe
Background: Telemedicine use rapidly increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study assessed quality aspects of rapid expansion of a virtual urgent care (VUC) telehealth system and the effects of a secondary telephonic screening initiative during the pandemic.
Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was performed in a single health care network of VUC patients from March 1, 2020, through April 20, 2020. Researchers abstracted demographic data, comorbidities, VUC return visits, emergency department (ED) referrals and ED visits, dispositions, intubations, and deaths. The team also reviewed incomplete visits. For comparison, the study evaluated outcomes of non-admission dispositions from the ED: return visits with and without admission and deaths. We separately analyzed the effects of enhanced callback system targeting higher-risk patients with COVID-like illness during the last two weeks of the study period.
Results: A total of 18,278 unique adult patients completed 22,413 VUC visits. Separately, 718 patient-scheduled visits were incomplete; the majority were no-shows. The study found that 50.9% of all patients and 74.1% of patients aged 60 years or older had comorbidities. Of VUC visits, 6.8% had a subsequent VUC encounter within 72 hours; 1.8% had a subsequent ED visit. Of patients with enhanced follow-up, 4.3% were referred for ED evaluation. Mortality was 0.20% overall; 0.21% initially and 0.16% with enhanced follow-up (p = 0.59). Males and black patients were significantly overrepresented in decedents.
Conclusion: Appropriately deployed VUC services can provide a pragmatic strategy to care for large numbers of patients. Ongoing surveillance of operational, technical, and clinical factors is critical for patient quality and safety with this modality.
(Copyright © 2020 The Joint Commission. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies