-
Tytuł:
-
A multi-institutional study assessing general surgery faculty teaching evaluations.
-
Autorzy:
-
Shellito AD; Department of Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA.
de Virgilio C; Department of Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA; Lundquist Institute of Biomedical Research, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA.
Kaji AH; Lundquist Institute of Biomedical Research, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA; Department of Emergency Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA.
Harrington DW; Department of Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA.
Robertson JM; Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Zern NK; Department of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Spain DA; Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Dickinson KJ; Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
Smink DS; Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Cho NL; Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Donahue T; Department of Surgery, UCLA Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Aarons CB; Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Namm JP; Department of Surgery, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Amersi F; Department of Surgery, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Tanner TN; Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Frey ES; Department of Surgery, Baptist Health System, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Jarman BT; Gunderson Medical Foundation, Gundersen Health System, La Crosse, WI, USA.
Smith BR; Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA, USA.
Gauvin JM; Department of Surgery, Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.
Brasel KJ; Department of Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Salcedo ES; Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Murayama K; Department of Surgery, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, USA.
Poola VP; Department of Surgery, Southern Illinois School of Medicine, Springfield, IL, USA.
Mpinga E; Department of Surgery, WellSpan York Hospital, York, PA, USA.
Inaba K; Department of Surgery, LAC-USC Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Calhoun KE; Department of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA. Electronic address: .
-
Źródło:
-
American journal of surgery [Am J Surg] 2021 Aug; Vol. 222 (2), pp. 334-340. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Dec 25.
-
Typ publikacji:
-
Journal Article; Multicenter Study
-
Język:
-
English
-
Imprint Name(s):
-
Publication: Belle Mead, NJ : Excerpta Medica
Original Publication: New York.
-
MeSH Terms:
-
Faculty, Medical*
Internship and Residency*
Professional Competence*
General Surgery/*education
Accreditation ; Humans ; Program Evaluation
-
Entry Date(s):
-
Date Created: 20210103 Date Completed: 20210915 Latest Revision: 20210915
-
Update Code:
-
20240105
-
DOI:
-
10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.12.030
-
PMID:
-
33388134
-
Background: Resident evaluation of faculty teaching is an important metric in general surgery training, however considerable variability in faculty teaching evaluation (FE) instruments exists.
Study Design: Twenty-two general surgery programs provided their FE and program demographics. Three clinical education experts performed blinded assessment of FEs, assessing adherence 2018 ACGME common program standards and if the FE was meaningful.
Results: Number of questions per FE ranged from 1 to 29. The expert assessments demonstrated that no evaluation addressed all 5 ACGME standards. There were significant differences in the FEs effectiveness of assessing the 5 ACGME standards (p < 0.001), with teaching abilities and professionalism rated the highest and scholarly activities the lowest.
Conclusion: There was wide variation between programs regarding FEs development and adhered to ACGME standards. Faculty evaluation tools consistently built around all suggested ACGME standards may allow for a more accurate and useful assessment of faculty teaching abilities to target professional development.
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have nothing to disclose.
(Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
