Advancements and critical steps for statistical analyses in blood pressure response to resistance training in hypertensive older women: a methodological approach.

Szczegóły
Abstrakt

Tytuł:: Advancements and critical steps for statistical analyses in blood pressure response to resistance training in hypertensive older women: a methodological approach.
Autorzy:: da Cunha Nascimento D; Department of Physical Education, Catholic University of Brasilia (UCB).; Department of Gerontology, Catholic University of Brasilia, UCB, Brasilia.
Neto IVS; Laboratory of Molecular Analysis, Graduate program of Sciences and Technology of Health, University of Brasilia (UNB), Distrito Federal.
Saraiva B; Department of Physical Education, Catholic University of Brasilia (UCB).
Lima ADS; Department of Physical Education, University of Brasilia (UNB), Brasilia, Brazil.
Navalta JW; Department of Kinesiology and Nutrition Sciences, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.
Pereira GB; Programa Interinstitucional de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Fisiológicas. Laboratório de Fisiologia do Exercício do Departamento de Ciências Fisiológicas da Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar), Brasil.
Willardson JM; Health and Human Performance Department, Montana State University Billings, Billings, Montana USA.
Rodrigues Beal FL; Department of Gerontology, Catholic University of Brasilia, UCB, Brasilia.
Prestes J; Department of Physical Education, Catholic University of Brasilia (UCB).
Źródło:: Blood pressure monitoring [Blood Press Monit] 2021 Apr 01; Vol. 26 (2), pp. 135-145.
Typ publikacji:: Journal Article
Język:: English
Imprint Name(s):: Publication: <2000->: Hagerstown, MD : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Original Publication: London ; Philadelphia, PA : Rapid Science Publishers, c1996-
MeSH Terms:: Hypertension*/therapy
Resistance Training*
Aged ; Blood Pressure ; Exercise ; Female ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Reproducibility of Results
References:: Buford TW. Hypertension and aging. Ageing Res Rev. 2016; 26:96–111.
Brown VA, Bartholomew LK, Naik AD. Management of chronic hypertension in older men: an exploration of patient goal-setting. Patient Educ Couns. 2007; 69:93–99.
Robitaille C, Dai S, Waters C, Loukine L, Bancej C, Quach S, et al. Diagnosed hypertension in Canada: incidence, prevalence and associated mortality. CMAJ. 2012; 184:E49–E56.
Cornelissen VA, Smart NA. Exercise training for blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2013; 2:e004473.
Damorim IR, Santos TM, Barros GWP, Carvalho PRC. Kinetics of hypotension during 50 sessions of resistance and aerobic training in hypertensive patients: a randomized clinical trial. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2017; 108:323–330.
Cavalcante PA, Rica RL, Evangelista AL, Serra AJ, Figueira A Jr, Pontes FL Jr, et al. Effects of exercise intensity on postexercise hypotension after resistance training session in overweight hypertensive patients. Clin Interv Aging. 2015; 10:1487–1495.
Lima LG, Bonardi JM, Campos GO, Bertani RF, Scher LM, Louzada-Junior P, et al. Effect of aerobic training and aerobic and resistance training on the inflammatory status of hypertensive older adults. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2015; 27:483–489.
Dos Santos ES, Asano RY, Filho IG, Lopes NL, Panelli P, Nascimento Dda C, et al. Acute and chronic cardiovascular response to 16 weeks of combined eccentric or traditional resistance and aerobic training in elderly hypertensive women: a randomized controlled trial. J Strength Cond Res. 2014; 28:3073–3084.
Moraes MR, Bacurau RF, Casarini DE, Jara ZP, Ronchi FA, Almeida SS, et al. Chronic conventional resistance exercise reduces blood pressure in stage 1 hypertensive men. J Strength Cond Res. 2012; 26:1122–1129.
Nascimento Dda C, Tibana RA, Benik FM, Fontana KE, Ribeiro Neto F, Santana FS, et al. Sustained effect of resistance training on blood pressure and hand grip strength following a detraining period in elderly hypertensive women: a pilot study. Clin Interv Aging. 2014; 9:219–225.
Moker EA, Bateman LA, Kraus WE, Pescatello LS. The relationship between the blood pressure responses to exercise following training and detraining periods. PLoS One. 2014; 9:e105755.
Costa EC, Dantas TC, de Farias Junior LF, Frazão DT, Prestes J, Moreira SR, et al. Inter- and intra-individual analysis of post-exercise hypotension following a single bout of high-intensity interval exercise and continuous exercise: a pilot study. Int J Sports Med. 2016; 37:1038–1043.
de Brito LC, Fecchio RY, Peçanha T, Lima A, Halliwill J, Forjaz CLM. Recommendations in post-exercise hypotension: concerns, best practices and interpretation. Int J Sports Med. 2019; 40:487–497.
Mota MR, de Oliveira RJ, Dutra MT, Pardono E, Terra DF, Lima RM, et al. Acute and chronic effects of resistive exercise on blood pressure in hypertensive elderly women. J Strength Cond Res. 2013; 27:3475–3480.
Tomeleri CM, Marcori AJ, Ribeiro AS, Gerage AM, Padilha CS, Schiavoni D, et al. Chronic blood pressure reductions and increments in plasma nitric oxide bioavailability. Int J Sports Med. 2017; 38:290–299.
Croymans DM, Krell SL, Oh CS, Katiraie M, Lam CY, Harris RA, Roberts CK. Effects of resistance training on central blood pressure in obese young men. J Hum Hypertens. 2014; 28:157–164.
Moreira SR, Cucato GG, Terra DF, Ritti-Dias RM. Acute blood pressure changes are related to chronic effects of resistance exercise in medicated hypertensives elderly women. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2016; 36:242–248.
Conceição MS, Bonganha V, Vechin FC, Berton RP, Lixandrão ME, Nogueira FR, et al. Sixteen weeks of resistance training can decrease the risk of metabolic syndrome in healthy postmenopausal women. Clin Interv Aging. 2013; 8:1221–1228.
Mann TN, Lamberts RP, Lambert MI. High responders and low responders: factors associated with individual variation in response to standardized training. Sports Med. 2014; 44:1113–1124.
Bouchard C, Blair SN, Church TS, Earnest CP, Hagberg JM, Häkkinen K, et al. Adverse metabolic response to regular exercise: is it a rare or common occurrence? PLoS One. 2012; 7:e37887.
Bonsu B, Terblanche E. The training and detraining effect of high-intensity interval training on post-exercise hypotension in young overweight/obese women. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016; 116:77–84.
Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, Peto R, Collins R; Prospective Studies Collaboration. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet. 2002; 360:1903–1913.
Lawes CM, Bennett DA, Feigin VL, Rodgers A. Blood pressure and stroke: an overview of published reviews. Stroke. 2004; 35:776–785.
Hardy ST, Loehr LR, Butler KR, Chakladar S, Chang PP, Folsom AR, et al. Reducing the blood pressure-related burden of cardiovascular disease: impact of achievable improvements in blood pressure prevention and control. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015; 4:e002276.
Stamler J, Rose G, Stamler R, Elliott P, Dyer A, Marmot M. INTERSALT study findings. Public health and medical care implications. Hypertension. 1989; 14:570–577.
Warren RE, Marshall T, Padfield PL, Chrubasik S. Variability of office, 24-hour ambulatory, and self-monitored blood pressure measurements. Br J Gen Pract. 2010; 60:675–680.
Nascimento DdC, Silva CR, Vieira DCL, Schoenfeld BJ, Prestes J. New insights for statistical analysis of blood pressure response to resistance training in elderly hypertensive women. J Phys Educ. 2019; 30:e3025.
Jones H, Atkinson G, Leary A, George K, Murphy M, Waterhouse J. Reactivity of ambulatory blood pressure to physical activity varies with time of day. Hypertension. 2006; 47:778–784.
Stang A, Poole C, Kuss O. The ongoing tyranny of statistical significance testing in biomedical research. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010; 25:225–230.
Wasserstein RL, Schirm AL, Lazar NA. Moving to a world beyond “p< 0.05”. Am Stat. 2019; 73:1–19.
Brito LC, Azevêdo L, Peçanha T, Fecchio RY, Rezende RA, da Silva GV, et al. Effects of ACEi and ARB on post-exercise hypotension induced by exercises conducted at different times of day in hypertensive men. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2020; 42:722–727.
Severin R, Sabbahi A, Albarrati A, Phillips SA, Arena S. Blood pressure screening by outpatient physical therapists: a call to action and clinical recommendations. Phys Ther. 2020; 100:1008–1019.
Loenneke JP, Fahs CA, Abe T, Rossow LM, Ozaki H, Pujol TJ, Bemben MG. Hypertension risk: exercise is medicine* for most but not all. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2014; 34:77–81.
Nascimento DDC, da Silva CR, Valduga R, Saraiva B, de Sousa Neto IV, Vieira A, et al. Blood pressure response to resistance training in hypertensive and normotensive older women. Clin Interv Aging. 2018; 13:541–553.
Bonafiglia JT, Nelms MW, Preobrazenski N, LeBlanc C, Robins L, Lu S, et al. Moving beyond threshold-based dichotomous classification to improve the accuracy in classifying non-responders. Physiol Rep. 2018; 6:e13928.
Swinton PA, Hemingway BS, Saunders B, Gualano B, Dolan E. A statistical framework to interpret individual response to intervention: paving the way for personalized nutrition and exercise prescription. Front Nutr. 2018; 5:41.
Hopkins W, Batterham A. The vindication of magnitude-based inference. Sportscience. 2018; 22:19–29.
Hopkins WG, Batterham AM. Error rates, decisive outcomes and publication bias with several inferential methods. Sports Med. 2016; 46:1563–1573.
Dvir Z. Difference, significant difference and clinically meaningful difference: the meaning of change in rehabilitation. J Exerc Rehabil. 2015; 11:67–73.
Weir JP. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res. 2005; 19:231–240.
Jensen SM, Schaarschmidt F, Onofri A, Ritz C. Experimental design matters for statistical analysis: how to handle blocking. Pest Manag Sci. 2018; 74:523–534.
Gueorguieva R, Krystal JH. Move over ANOVA: progress in analyzing repeated-measures data and its reflection in papers published in the archives of general psychiatry. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004; 61:310–317.
Cook NR, Cohen J, Hebert PR, Taylor JO, Hennekens CH. Implications of small reductions in diastolic blood pressure for primary prevention. Arch Intern Med. 1995; 155:701–709.
Rickham PP. Human experimentation. Code of ethics of the world medical association. Declaration of Helsinki. Br Med J. 1964; 2:177.
Schulc E, Gothe RM, Them C, Tufan İ, Mueller G. Self-reported questionnaire of functional health of home-dwelling elderly people living in Austria: based on the patient questionnaire of the standardized assessment of elderly people in primary care. J Nurs Meas. 2017; 25:238–256.
Apel JM, Lacey RM, Kell RT. A comparison of traditional and weekly undulating periodized strength training programs with total volume and intensity equated. J Strength Cond Res. 2011; 25:694–703.
Prestes J, Shiguemoto G, Botero JP, Frollini A, Dias R, Leite R, et al. Effects of resistance training on resistin, leptin, cytokines, and muscle force in elderly post-menopausal women. J Sports Sci. 2009; 27:1607–1615.
Gentil P, Bottaro M. Influence of supervision ratio on muscle adaptations to resistance training in nontrained subjects. J Strength Cond Res. 2010; 24:639–643.
Gomides RS, Costa LA, Souza DR, Queiroz AC, Fernandes JR, Ortega KC, et al. Atenolol blunts blood pressure increase during dynamic resistance exercise in hypertensives. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010; 70:664–673.
Cuckson AC, Reinders A, Shabeeh H, Shennan AH; British Hypertension Society. Validation of the Microlife BP 3BTO-A oscillometric blood pressure monitoring device according to a modified British hypertension society protocol. Blood Press Monit. 2002; 7:319–324.
Pickering TG, Hall JE, Appel LJ, Falkner BE, Graves J, Hill MN, et al.; Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research. Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals: Part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans: a statement for professionals from the subcommittee of professional and public education of the American Heart Association Council on high blood pressure research. Hypertension. 2005; 45:142–161.
Sociedade Brasileira de C, Sociedade Brasileira de H, Sociedade Brasileira de N. [VI Brazilian guidelines on hypertension]. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2010; 95:1–51.
Wang JG, Staessen JA, Franklin SS, Fagard R, Gueyffier F. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure lowering as determinants of cardiovascular outcome. Hypertension. 2005; 45:907–913.
Dankel SJ, Loenneke JP. Effect sizes for paired data should use the change score variability rather than the pre-test variability. J Strength Cond Res. 2018. Online ahead of print.
Samsa G, Edelman D, Rothman ML, Williams GR, Lipscomb J, Matchar D. Determining clinically important differences in health status measures: a general approach with illustration to the health utilities index mark II. Pharmacoeconomics. 1999; 15:141–155.
Copay AG, Subach BR, Glassman SD, Polly DW Jr, Schuler TC. Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods. Spine J. 2007; 7:541–546.
Hopkins W. Design and analysis for studies of individual responses. Sportscience. 2018; 22:39–51.
Ritti-Dias RM, Correia MA, Farah BQ. Visual data: a new tool to improve the presentation of clinical trial results. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2020; 18:eAE4729.
West BT, Welch KB, Galecki AT. Linear mixed models: a practical guide using statistical software. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2007.
Brace N, Kemp R, Snelgar R. SPSS for psychologists: a guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows, versions 9, 10, and 11. 2nd ed. Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates; 2003.
Field A. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. 4th ed. Sage, London; 2013.
Ketelhut RG, Franz IW, Scholze J. Efficacy and position of endurance training as a non-drug therapy in the treatment of arterial hypertension. J Hum Hypertens. 1997; 11:651–655.
Kreidler SM, Muller KE, Grunwald GK, Ringham BM, Coker-Dukowitz ZT, Sakhadeo UR, et al. GLIMMPSE: online power computation for linear models with and without a baseline covariate. J Stat Softw. 2013; 54:i10.
Wright JG. The minimal important difference: who’s to say what is important? J Clin Epidemiol. 1996; 49:1221–1222.
de Vet HC, Ostelo RW, Terwee CB, van der Roer N, Knol DL, Beckerman H, et al. Minimally important change determined by a visual method integrating an anchor-based and a distribution-based approach. Qual Life Res. 2007; 16:131–142.
Prestes J, Nascimento DDC, Neto IVS, Tibana RA, Shiguemoto GE, Perez SEA, et al. The effects of muscle strength responsiveness to periodized resistance training on resistin, leptin, and cytokine in elderly postmenopausal women. J Strength Cond Res. 2018; 32:113–120.
Prestes J, da Cunha Nascimento D, Tibana RA, Teixeira TG, Vieira DC, Tajra V, et al. Understanding the individual responsiveness to resistance training periodization. Age (Dordr). 2015; 37:9793.
Tajra V, Tibana RA, Vieira DC, de Farias DL, Teixeira TG, Funghetto SS, et al. Identification of high responders for interleukin-6 and creatine kinase following acute eccentric resistance exercise in elderly obese women. J Sci Med Sport. 2014; 17:662–666.
Mercieca-Bebber R, King MT, Calvert MJ, Stockler MR, Friedlander M. The importance of patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials and strategies for future optimization. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2018; 9:353–367.
Entry Date(s):: Date Created: 20210104 Date Completed: 20210305 Latest Revision: 20210305
Update Code:: 20240105
DOI:: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000505
PMID:: 33394597
: Czasopismo naukowe

Background: Repeated measures analysis of covariance and three-way analysis of variance with repeated measures are common statistical methods. For a valid interpretation of blood pressure (BP) response to exercise, a variety of additional statistical methods must be implemented. Four additional statistical methods are presented: technical error of measurement (SEM), smallest real difference (SRD), magnitude-based inference and mixed effect modeling technique (MEM). The aim of this perspective article is to demonstrate how to apply already known statistical analyses regarding BP responsiveness in order to improve interpretation and achieve higher reliability for future studies in exercise science.
Methods: A total of 27 hypertensive older women (aged 68.37 ± 5.55 years) participated in the present study. A whole-body resistance training (RT) program was performed on two nonconsecutive days per week for 10 weeks. BP was monitored during the 10-week RT intervention and after 15 weeks of detraining. First, individuals were classified as high and low responders, then statistical methods to analyze data included the use of SEM, SRD, magnitude-based inference and MEM.
Results: When magnitude-based inference was used to classify responsiveness, most participants displayed a trivial response. Decrements in SBP between 1 and 10 mmHg were not clinically meaningful but fell within the measurement error of the SBP measurements. Baseline SBP and time of training predicted post-SBP response.
Conclusion: Changes over time and declines in SBP might not be a SRD and fell in the SEM. Moreover, SBP responsiveness was the result of inappropriate control of covariates such as period of training.
(Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Informacja