Social facilitation of alcohol subjective effects in adolescents: Associations with subsequent alcohol use.

Szczegóły
Abstrakt

Tytuł:: Social facilitation of alcohol subjective effects in adolescents: Associations with subsequent alcohol use.
Autorzy:: Kirkpatrick MG; Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 2001 N. Soto Street, Room 302B, Los Angeles, CA, 90032, USA. .
Cho J; Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 2001 N. Soto Street, Room 302B, Los Angeles, CA, 90032, USA.
Stone MD; Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
Bae D; Department of Home Economics Education, College of Education, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.
Barrington-Trimis JL; Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 2001 N. Soto Street, Room 302B, Los Angeles, CA, 90032, USA.
Pang RD; Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 2001 N. Soto Street, Room 302B, Los Angeles, CA, 90032, USA.
Leventhal AM; Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 2001 N. Soto Street, Room 302B, Los Angeles, CA, 90032, USA.; Department of Psychology, Dornsife College of Letters, Arts, and Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Źródło:: Psychopharmacology [Psychopharmacology (Berl)] 2021 Mar; Vol. 238 (3), pp. 887-897. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jan 06.
Typ publikacji:: Journal Article
Język:: English
Imprint Name(s):: Original Publication: Berlin, New York, Springer-Verlag.
MeSH Terms:: Risk-Taking*
Social Facilitation*
Students*
Binge Drinking/*psychology
Ethanol/*administration & dosage
Underage Drinking/*psychology
Adolescent ; Adult ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Prospective Studies ; Surveys and Questionnaires
References:: J Psychopharmacol. 2006 May;20(3):437-46. (PMID: 16174668)
Psychol Addict Behav. 2006 Dec;20(4):363-72. (PMID: 17176171)
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1993 Feb;17(1):140-6. (PMID: 8452195)
Psychol Assess. 2013 Sep;25(3):780-795. (PMID: 23647036)
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011 Apr;68(4):389-99. (PMID: 21464363)
Drug Alcohol Depend. 1984 Oct;14(2):141-63. (PMID: 6510218)
J Adolesc Health. 2007 Mar;40(3):232-7. (PMID: 17321423)
J Stud Alcohol. 1999 Jan;60(1):90-8. (PMID: 10096313)
J Psychopharmacol. 2019 Jul;33(7):769-778. (PMID: 30829118)
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012 Jul;36(6):1565-76. (PMID: 22542906)
Addiction. 2020 Nov;115(11):1989-2007. (PMID: 32196794)
Br J Addict. 1991 Dec;86(12):1563-70. (PMID: 1786488)
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1919792. (PMID: 31977062)
J Abnorm Psychol. 2015 Aug;124(3):660-73. (PMID: 25844684)
J Stud Alcohol. 1985 Mar;46(2):137-46. (PMID: 3990300)
Addiction. 2021 Feb;116(2):382-393. (PMID: 32533801)
Psychol Addict Behav. 2017 May;31(3):255-264. (PMID: 28287750)
Addict Behav. 2008 Jan;33(1):106-21. (PMID: 17913378)
Addiction. 2007 Jan;102(1):71-80. (PMID: 17207125)
Addict Behav. 2006 Oct;31(10):1844-57. (PMID: 16460883)
JAMA. 2015 Aug 18;314(7):700-7. (PMID: 26284721)
J Stud Alcohol. 1987 Sep;48(5):483-91. (PMID: 3669677)
J Abnorm Psychol. 2018 May;127(4):359-373. (PMID: 29745701)
J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse. 2007 Mar 1;16(2):115-127. (PMID: 20228956)
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1995 Mar;118(1):19-27. (PMID: 7597118)
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2009 Mar;92(1):131-4. (PMID: 19032962)
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012 Sep 1;125(1-2):43-8. (PMID: 22494879)
J Urban Health. 2005 Mar;82(1 Suppl 1):i18-25. (PMID: 15738324)
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2018 Apr;235(4):935-945. (PMID: 29470605)
Psychol Sci. 2012 Aug 1;23(8):869-78. (PMID: 22760882)
Addict Behav. 1993 Mar-Apr;18(2):159-69. (PMID: 8506787)
Alcohol Alcohol. 2008 Nov-Dec;43(6):636-40. (PMID: 18684808)
Dev Psychol. 2012 Sep;48(5):1488-500. (PMID: 22390662)
J Adolesc Health. 2018 Jul;63(1):81-87. (PMID: 29731318)
J Adolesc Health. 2014 Dec;55(6):842-4. (PMID: 25156895)
Biol Psychiatry. 2014 May 15;75(10):798-806. (PMID: 24094754)
J Neurosci. 2006 Jun 21;26(25):6885-92. (PMID: 16793895)
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2010 Jun 4;59(5):1-142. (PMID: 20520591)
Front Behav Neurosci. 2010 Jul 13;4:. (PMID: 20700386)
Clin Psychol Sci. 2015 Sep;3(5):686-701. (PMID: 26504673)
JAMA. 2018 Jul 17;320(3):255-263. (PMID: 30027248)
Health Place. 2000 Jun;6(2):105-15. (PMID: 10785352)
J Stud Alcohol. 1993 Sep;54(5):590-9. (PMID: 8412149)
J Abnorm Psychol. 1974 Aug;83(4):418-25. (PMID: 4414699)
Clin Psychol Sci. 2014 Sep;2(5):602-610. (PMID: 25977842)
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2016 Oct;40:81-85. (PMID: 27420376)
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2013 Nov;230(2):215-26. (PMID: 23712603)
Alcohol Res Health. 1999;23(4):250-5. (PMID: 10890821)
Grant Information:: R01 DA033296 United States DA NIDA NIH HHS; R01-DA033296 United States DA NIDA NIH HHS
Contributed Indexing:: Keywords: Adolescents; Alcohol; Binge drinking; Context; Humans; Social; Subjective effects
Substance Nomenclature:: 3K9958V90M (Ethanol)
Entry Date(s):: Date Created: 20210106 Date Completed: 20210315 Latest Revision: 20230829
Update Code:: 20240105
PubMed Central ID:: PMC10461607
DOI:: 10.1007/s00213-020-05740-4
PMID:: 33404735
: Czasopismo naukowe

Pełny tekst

Rationale: Laboratory research in adults indicates that alcohol-related subjective effects are enhanced under some social conditions. However, it is unknown whether this "social facilitation" of alcohol effects occurs in adolescents and is associated with alcohol use in the natural ecology.
Objectives: We examined associations of social facilitation of alcohol-related subjective effects with subsequent alcohol use among a relatively high-risk group of adolescents who reported drinking alcohol both with friends and alone.
Methods: Los Angeles high school students from a prospective study (N = 142; 51% female; 10th graders) completed a baseline survey that assessed alcohol-related "positive" and "negative" subjective effects in two contexts: social (alcohol with friends) and solitary (alcohol alone); social facilitation was calculated as the difference between social and solitary. Students then completed five semi-annual surveys spanning 30 months (2014-2017) assessing 30-day alcohol use (days used, number of drinks, binge drinking).
Results: Greater social facilitation of positive effects was significantly associated with greater number of alcohol use days (RR [95% CI] = 1.48 [1.19, 1.82]; p < .001), greater number of drinks (RR [95% CI] = 1.38 [1.14, 1.66]; p = .001), and greater odds of binge drinking (OR [95% CI] = 1.75 [1.20, 2.57]; p = .004). Similar associations were found with social positive effects. There were no significant associations between solitary positive effects-or any negative effects-and alcohol use outcomes.
Conclusions: Social facilitation can be measured outside of the laboratory. Relatively high-risk drinking adolescents who are more susceptible to the social facilitation of subjective alcohol effects are more likely to use more alcohol and binge drink.

Informacja