Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Przeglądasz jako GOŚĆ
Tytuł pozycji:

Looking into the mind's eye: Directed and evaluated imagery vividness modulates imagery-perception congruency effects.

Tytuł :
Looking into the mind's eye: Directed and evaluated imagery vividness modulates imagery-perception congruency effects.
Autorzy :
Cochrane BA; Department of Psychology, Neuroscience & Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. .; Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Sidney Smith Hall, 100 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 3G3, Canada. .
Ng V; Department of Psychology, Neuroscience & Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Khosla A; Department of Psychology, Neuroscience & Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Milliken B; Department of Psychology, Neuroscience & Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Pokaż więcej
Źródło :
Psychonomic bulletin & review [Psychon Bull Rev] 2021 Jan 14. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jan 14.
Publication Model :
Ahead of Print
Typ publikacji :
Journal Article
Język :
English
Imprint Name(s) :
Publication: <2013-> : [New York : Springer]
Original Publication: Austin, TX : Psychonomic Society, Inc., c1994-
References :
Awh, E., Belopolsky, A. V., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: A failed theoretical dichotomy. Trends in Cognitive Science, 16(8), 437–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.06.010. (PMID: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.06.010)
Berkeley, G., Goldschmidt, T., & Stapleford, S. (2016). Berkeley’s principles: Expanded and explained. New York, NY: Routledge.
Chang, S., Lewis, D. E., & Pearson, J. (2013). The functional effects of color perception and color imagery. Journal of Vision, 13(10), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1167/13.10.4. (PMID: 10.1167/13.10.4)
Cochrane, B. A., & Milliken, B. (2019). Imagined event files: An interplay between imagined and perceived objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(2), 538–544. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01572-2. (PMID: 10.3758/s13423-019-01572-2)
Cochrane, B. A., & Milliken, B. (2020). The representational basis of positive and negative repetition effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 46(3), 252–263. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000713. (PMID: 10.1037/xhp000071331697156)
Cochrane, B. A., Nwabuike, A. A., Thomson, D. R., & Milliken, B. (2018). An imagery-induced reversal of intertrial priming in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(4), 572–587. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000470. (PMID: 10.1037/xlm000047029094983)
Cochrane, B. A., & Pratt, J. (2020). Re-examining Maljkovic and Nakayama (1994): Conscious expectancy does affect the priming of pop-out effect. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82, 2693–2702. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02034-x. (PMID: 10.3758/s13414-020-02034-x)
Cochrane, B. A., Siddhpuria, S., & Milliken, B. (2019). Cueing color imagery: A critical analysis of imagery-perception congruency effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(8), 1410–1421. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000653. (PMID: 10.1037/xlm000065330047772)
Cochrane, B. A., Townsend, B., Lee, R. C., Legere, J. K., Milliken, B., & Shedden, J. M. (2020). Visual imagery influences attentional guidance during visual search: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02208-7.
Cochrane, B. A., Zhu, H., & Milliken, B. (2018). Strategic visual imagery and automatic priming effects in pop-out visual search. Consciousness and Cognition, 65, 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2018.07.008. (PMID: 10.1016/j.concog.2018.07.00830041068)
Cousineau, D. (2005). Confidence intervals in within-subject design: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson’s method. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 1(1), 42–45. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.01.1.p042. (PMID: 10.20982/tqmp.01.1.p042)
Cui, X., Jeter, C. B., Yang, D., Montague, P. R. & Eagleman, D. M. (2007). Vividness of mental imagery: Individual variability can be measured objectively. Vision Research, 47(4), 474–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2006.11.013. (PMID: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.11.013172399151839967)
Dijkstra, N., Bosch, S. E., & Gerven, M. A. J. (2017). Vividness of visual imagery depends on the neural overlap with perception in visual areas. The Journal of Neuroscience, 37(5), 1367–1373. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3022-16.2016. (PMID: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3022-16.2016280739406596858)
Dijkstra, N., Bosch, S. E., & van Gerven, M. A. J. (2019). Shared neural mechanisms of visual perception and imagery. Trends in Cognitive Science, 23(5), 423–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.02.004. (PMID: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.02.004)
Isaac, A. R., & Marks, D. F. (1994). Individual differences in mental imagery experience: Developmental changes and specialization. British Journal of Psychology, 85(4), 479–500. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1994.tb02536.x. (PMID: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1994.tb02536.x7812670)
Kosslyn, S. M. (1996). Image and brain: The resolution of the imagery debate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kosslyn, S. M., Brunn, J., Cave, K. R., & Wallach, R. W. (1984). Individual differences in mental imagery ability: A computational analysis. Cognition, 18(1/3), 195–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(84)90025-8. (PMID: 10.1016/0010-0277(84)90025-86543163)
Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (1994). Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features. Memory & Cognition, 22(6), 657–672. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209251. (PMID: 10.3758/BF03209251)
Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (2000). Priming of pop-out: III. A short-term implicit memory system beneficial for rapid target selection. Visual Cognition, 7(5), 571–595. https://doi.org/10.1080/135062800407202. (PMID: 10.1080/135062800407202)
Marks, D. F. (1995). New directions for mental imagery research. Journal of Mental Imagery, 19(3/4), 153–166.
Morey, R. D. (2008). Confidence intervals from normalized data: A correction to Cousineau (2005). Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 4(2), 61–64. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.04.2.p061. (PMID: 10.20982/tqmp.04.2.p061)
Moriya, J. (2018). Visual mental imagery influences attentional guidance. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 80(5), 1127–1142. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-018-1520-0. (PMID: 10.3758/s13414-018-1520-0)
Pearson, J., Clifford, C. W. G., & Tong, F. (2008). The functional impact of mental imagery on conscious perception. Current Biology, 18(13), 982–986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2008.05.048. (PMID: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.05.04818583132)
Pearson, J., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2015). The heterogeneity of mental representations: Ending the imagery debate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(33), 10089–10092. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1504933112. (PMID: 10.1073/pnas.1504933112261750244547292)
Pearson, J., Rademaker, R. L., & Tong, F. (2011). Evaluating the mind’s eye: The metacognition of visual imagery. Psychological Science, 22(12), 1535–1542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417134. (PMID: 10.1177/095679761141713422058106)
Reinhart, R. M. G., McClenahan, L. J., & Woodman, G. F. (2015). Visualizing trumps vision in training attention. Psychological Science, 26(7), 1114–1122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615577619. (PMID: 10.1177/0956797615577619259636154504754)
Soto, D., Heinke, D., Humphreys, G. W., & Blanco, M. J. (2005). Early involuntary top-down guidance of attention from working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(2), 248–261. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.31.2.248. (PMID: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.2.24815826228)
Soto, D., Humphreys, G. W., & Heinke, D. (2006). Working memory can guide pop-out search. Vision Research, 46(6/7), 1010–1018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2005.09.008. (PMID: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.09.00816257030)
Theeuwes, J. (2013). Feature-based attention: It is all bottom-up priming. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 368(1628), Article 20130055. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0055.
Thomson, D. R., D’Ascenzo, M., & Milliken, B. (2013). Learning what to expect: Context-specific control over intertrial priming effects in singleton search. Memory & Cognition, 41, 533–546. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-012-0278-1. (PMID: 10.3758/s13421-012-0278-1)
Tye, M. (1991). The imagery debate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Van Selst, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (1994). A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47(3), 631–650. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749408401131. (PMID: 10.1080/14640749408401131)
Wantz, A. L., Borst, G., Mast, F. W., & Lobmaier, J. S. (2015). Colors in mind: A novel paradigm to investigate pure color imagery. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(4), 1152–1161. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000079. (PMID: 10.1037/xlm000007925419823)
Wolfe, J. M., Horowitz, T. S., Kenner, N., Hyle, M., & Vasan, N. (2004). How fast can you change your mind? The speed of top-down guidance in visual search. Vision Research, 44(12), 1411–1426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2003.11.024. (PMID: 10.1016/j.visres.2003.11.02415066400)
Contributed Indexing :
Keywords: Attention capture; Imagery; Metacognition; Visual search
Entry Date(s) :
Date Created: 20210114 Latest Revision: 20210114
Update Code :
20210210
DOI :
10.3758/s13423-020-01868-8
PMID :
33443707
Czasopismo naukowe
While most people have had the experience of seeing a representation in the mind's eye, it is an open question whether we have control over the vividness of these representations. The present study explored this issue by using an imagery-perception interface whereby color imagery was used to prime congruent color targets in visual search. In Experiments 1a and 1b, participants were required to report the vividness of an imagined representation after generating it, and in Experiment 2, participants were directed to create an imagined representation with particular vividness prior to generating it. The analyses revealed that the magnitude of the imagery congruency effect increased with both reported and directed vividness. The findings here strongly support the notion that participants have metacognitive awareness of the mind's eye and willful control over the vividness of its representations.

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies