Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Przeglądasz jako GOŚĆ
Tytuł pozycji:

Hi-def memories of lo-def scenes.

Tytuł :
Hi-def memories of lo-def scenes.
Autorzy :
Rivera-Aparicio J; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA.
Yu Q; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA.
Firestone C; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA. .
Pokaż więcej
Źródło :
Psychonomic bulletin & review [Psychon Bull Rev] 2021 Jan 14. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jan 14.
Publication Model :
Ahead of Print
Typ publikacji :
Journal Article
Język :
English
Imprint Name(s) :
Publication: <2013-> : [New York : Springer]
Original Publication: Austin, TX : Psychonomic Society, Inc., c1994-
References :
Bae, G. Y., Olkkonen, M., Allred, S. R., & Flombaum, J. I. (2015). Why some colors appear more memorable than others: A model combining categories and particulars in color working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 744. (PMID: 10.1037/xge0000076)
Bainbridge, W. A., & Baker, C. I. (2020). Boundaries extend and contract in scene memory depending on image properties. Current Biology, 30, 537–543. (PMID: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.12.004)
Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brady, T. F., Konkle, T., & Alvarez, G. A. (2011). A review of visual memory capacity: Beyond individual items and toward structured representations. Journal of Vision, 11, 4:1–34. (PMID: 10.1167/11.4.1)
Brewer, W. F., & Treyens, J. C. (1981). Role of schemata in memory for places. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 207-230. (PMID: 10.1016/0010-0285(81)90008-6)
Cooper, R. A., Kensinger, E. A., & Ritchey, M. (2019). Memories fade: The relationship between memory vividness and remembered visual salience. Psychological Science. Published online ahead of print.
Crump, M. J., McDonnell, J. V., & Gureckis, T. M. (2013). Evaluating Amazon's Mechanical Turk as a tool for experimental behavioral research. PLoS One, 8, e57410. (PMID: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057410)
Engelhard, I. M., McNally, R. J., & van Schie, K. (2019). Retrieving and modifying traumatic memories: Recent research relevant to three controversies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28, 91–96. (PMID: 10.1177/0963721418807728)
Firestone, C. (2013). On the origin and status of the “El Greco fallacy”. Perception, 42, 672–674. (PMID: 10.1068/p7488)
Firestone, C., & Scholl, B. J. (2014). “Top-down” effects where none should be found: The El Greco fallacy in perception research. Psychological Science, 25, 38–46. (PMID: 10.1177/0956797613485092)
Firestone, C., & Scholl, B. J. (2015). When do ratings implicate perception vs. judgment? The “overgeneralization test” for top-down effects. Visual Cognition, 23, 1217–1226. (PMID: 10.1080/13506285.2016.1160171)
Gallistel, C. R., & King, A. P. (2009). Memory and the computational brain: Why cognitive science will transform neuroscience. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444310498 .
Harrison, S. A., & Tong, F. (2009). Decoding reveals the contents of visual working memory in early visual areas. Nature, 458, 632–635. (PMID: 10.1038/nature07832)
Hemmer, P., & Steyvers, M. (2009). A Bayesian account of reconstructive memory. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 189–202. (PMID: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01010.x)
Hume, D. (1739/1978). A Treatise of Human Nature (Book 1). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. V., Duncan, S. (1991). Categories and particulars: Prototype effects in estimating spatial location. Psychological Review, 98, 352–376. (PMID: 10.1037/0033-295X.98.3.352)
Ichikawa, J. (2009). Dreaming and imagination. Mind and Language, 24, 103–121. (PMID: 10.1111/j.1468-0017.2008.01355.x)
Intraub, H., & Richardson, M. (1989). Wide-angle memories of close-up scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 179–187. (PMID: 2522508)
Oliva, A., & Torralba, A. (2001). Modeling the shape of the scene: A holistic representation of the spatial envelope. International Journal of Computer Vision, 42, 145–175. (PMID: 10.1023/A:1011139631724)
Roese, N. J., & Vohs, K. D. (2012). Hindsight bias. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 411–426. (PMID: 10.1177/1745691612454303)
Park, S., Brady, T. F., Greene, M. R., & Oliva, A. (2011). Disentangling scene content from spatial boundary: Complementary roles for the parahippocampal place area and lateral occipital complex in representing real-world scenes. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 1333–1340. (PMID: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3885-10.2011)
Park, S., Intraub, H., Yi, D.-J., Widders, D., & Chun, M. M. (2007). Beyond the edges of a view: boundary extension in human scene-selective visual cortex. Neuron, 54, 335–342. (PMID: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.04.006)
Perez, D., Cook, S., & Peterson, M. (2020). Prior experience alters the appearance of blurry object borders. Scientific Reports, 10, 5821. (PMID: 10.1038/s41598-020-62728-y)
Persaud, K., & Hemmer, P. (2016). The dynamics of fidelity over the time course of long-term memory. Cognitive Psychology, 88, 1–21. (PMID: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.05.003)
Serences, J. T., Ester, E. F., Vogel, E. K., & Awh, E. (2009). Stimulus-specific delay activity in human primary visual cortex. Psychological Science, 20, 207–214. (PMID: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02276.x)
Siegel, S., Byrne, A. (2017). Rich or thin? In B. Nanay (ed.), Current Controversies in Philosophy of Perception. Routledge.
Valenti, J. J., & Firestone, C. (2019). Finding the “odd one out”: Memory color effects and the logic of appearance. Cognition, 191, 103934. (PMID: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.04.003)
Xu, Y. (2017). Reevaluating the sensory account of visual working memory storage. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21, 794–815. (PMID: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.06.013)
Contributed Indexing :
Keywords: Boundary extension; Memory; Scene perception; Vividness
Entry Date(s) :
Date Created: 20210114 Latest Revision: 20210114
Update Code :
20210210
DOI :
10.3758/s13423-020-01829-1
PMID :
33443710
Czasopismo naukowe
The study of visual memory is typically concerned with an image's content: How well, and with what precision, we can recall which objects, people, or features we have seen in the past. But images also vary in their quality: The same object or scene may appear in an image that is sharp and highly resolved, or it may appear in an image that is blurry and faded. How do we remember those properties? Here six experiments demonstrate a new phenomenon of "vividness extension": a tendency to (mis)remember images as though they are "enhanced" versions of themselves - that is, sharper and higher quality than they actually appeared at the time of encoding. Subjects briefly saw images of scenes that varied in how blurry they were, and then adjusted a new image to be as blurry as the original. Unlike an old photograph that fades and blurs, subjects misremembered scenes as more vivid (i.e., less blurry) than those scenes had actually appeared moments earlier. Follow-up experiments extended this phenomenon to saturation and pixelation - with subjects recalling scenes as more colorful and resolved - and ruled out various forms of response bias. We suggest that memory misrepresents the quality of what we have seen, such that the world is remembered as more vivid than it is.

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies