The IFSO Worldwide One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Survey: Techniques and Outcomes?

Szczegóły
Abstrakt

Tytuł:: The IFSO Worldwide One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Survey: Techniques and Outcomes?
Autorzy:: Haddad A; Minimally Invasive & Bariatric Surgery, Gastrointestinal Bariatric and Metabolic Center (GBMC) -Jordan Hospital, Queen Noor St., 4th Circle, P.O BOX 3073, Amman, 11181, Jordan. .
Bashir A; Minimally Invasive & Bariatric Surgery, Gastrointestinal Bariatric and Metabolic Center (GBMC) -Jordan Hospital, Queen Noor St., 4th Circle, P.O BOX 3073, Amman, 11181, Jordan.
Fobi M; Clinical Affairs and Research, Mohak Bariatric and Robotics, Indore, India.
Higa K; Advanced Laparoscopic Surgery Associates, University of California San Francisco-Fresno, Fresno Heart and Surgical Hospital, Fresno, CA, USA.
Herrera MF; Endocrine and Bariatric Surgery, UNAM at INCMNSZ, Mexico City, México.
Torres AJ; General and Bariatric Surgery, Complutense University of Madrid, Hospital Clinico 'San Carlos', Madrid, Spain.
Himpens J; Metabolic-Bariatric Surgery, CHIREC Delta Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.; St Pierre University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
Shikora S; Harvard Medical School, Center for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Ramos AC; Gastro-Obeso-Center Institute of Metabolic Optimization, Bela Vista, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Kow L; Adelaide Bariatric Centre, 12 The Parade, Norwood, SA, 5067, Australia.
Nimeri AA; Atrium Health Weight Management, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Źródło:: Obesity surgery [Obes Surg] 2021 Apr; Vol. 31 (4), pp. 1411-1421. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jan 31.
Typ publikacji:: Journal Article
Język:: English
Imprint Name(s):: Publication: 2006- : New York : Springer Science + Business Media
Original Publication: Oxford, OX, UK : Rapid Communications of Oxford, [1991-
MeSH Terms:: Bile Reflux*
Gastric Bypass*
Obesity, Morbid*/surgery
Gastrectomy ; Humans ; Weight Loss
References:: Rutledge R. The mini-gastric bypass: experience with the first 1,274 cases. Obes Surg. 2001;11(3):276–80. https://doi.org/10.1381/096089201321336584 . (PMID: 10.1381/09608920132133658411433900)
Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. IFSO Worldwide Survey 2016: primary, endoluminal, and revisional procedures. Obes Surg. 2018;28(12):3783–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3450-2 . (PMID: 10.1007/s11695-018-3450-230121858)
Musella M, Susa A, Greco F, et al. The laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass: the Italian experience: outcomes from 974 consecutive cases in a multicenter review. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(1):156–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3141-y . (PMID: 10.1007/s00464-013-3141-y)
Musella M, Susa A, Manno E, et al. Complications following the mini/one anastomosis gastric bypass (MGB/OAGB): a multiinstitutional survey on 2678 patients with a mid-term (5 years) follow-up. Obes Surg. 2017;27(11):2956–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-017-2726-2 . (PMID: 10.1007/s11695-017-2726-228569357)
Bruzzi M, Voron T, Zinzindohoue F, et al. Revisional single-anastomosis gastric bypass for a failed restrictive procedure: 5-year results. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(2):240–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2015.08.521 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.soard.2015.08.52126614688)
Taha O, Abdelaal M, Abozeid M, et al. Outcomes of omega loop gastric bypass, 6-years experience of 1520 cases. Obes Surg. 2017;27(8):1952–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-017-2623-8 . (PMID: 10.1007/s11695-017-2623-828303503)
Carbajo MA, Luque-de-León E, Jiménez JM, et al. Laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass: technique, results, and long-term follow-up in 1200 patients. Obes Surg. 2017;27(5):1153–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2428-1 . (PMID: 10.1007/s11695-016-2428-127783366)
Facchiano E, Leuratti L, Veltri M, et al. Laparoscopic conversion of one anastomosis gastric bypass to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for chronic bile reflux. Obes Surg. 2016;26(3):701–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-2017-8 . (PMID: 10.1007/s11695-015-2017-826746224)
Nimeri A, Al Shaban T, Maasher A. Laparoscopic conversion of one anastomosis gastric bypass/mini gastric bypass to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for bile reflux gastritis. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13(1):119–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2016.09.033 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.09.03327825579)
Nimeri A, Al Shaban T, Maasher A. Conversion of one anastomosis gastric bypass/mini gastric bypass to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for bile reflux gastritis after failed Braun jejunojejunostomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13(2):361–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2016.10.022 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.10.02227986575)
Haddad A, Bashir A, Nimeri A. Gastrogastric fistula: an unusual cause for severe bile reflux following conversion of sleeve gastrectomy to one anastomosis gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2018;28(7):2151–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3288-7 . (PMID: 10.1007/s11695-018-3288-729728987)
Haddad A, Fobi M, Bashir A, et al. Outcomes of one anastomosis gastric bypass in the IFSO Middle East North Africa (MENA) Region. Obes Surg. 2019;29(8):2409–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-03881-w . (PMID: 10.1007/s11695-019-03881-w30969389)
Kular KS, Manchanda N, Rutledge R. Analysis of the five-year outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy and mini gastric bypass: a report from the Indian sub-continent. Obes Surg. 2014;24(10):1724–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-014-1264-4 . (PMID: 10.1007/s11695-014-1264-424805912)
Magouliotis DE, Tasiopoulou VS, Svokos AA, et al. One-anastomosis gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2017;27(9):2479–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-017-2807-2 . (PMID: 10.1007/s11695-017-2807-228681256)
Madhok B, Mahawar KK, Boyle M, et al. Management of super-super obese patients: comparison between mini (one anastomosis) gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2016;26(7):1646–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2181-5 . (PMID: 10.1007/s11695-016-2181-527067912)
Bruzzi M, Rau C, Voron T, et al. Single anastomosis or mini-gastric bypass: long-term results and quality of life after a 5-year follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(2):321–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2014.09.004 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.09.00425614356)
Liagre A, Debs T, Kassir R, et al. One anastomosis gastric bypass with a biliopancreatic limb of 150 cm: weight loss, nutritional outcomes, endoscopic results, and quality of life at 8-year follow-up. Obes Surg. 2020;30(11):4206–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04775-y . (PMID: 10.1007/s11695-020-04775-y32562132)
Sheikh L, Pearless LA, Booth MW. Laparoscopic silastic ring mini-gastric bypass (SR-MGBP): up to 11-year results from a single centre. Obes Surg. 2017;27(9):2229–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-017-2659-9 . (PMID: 10.1007/s11695-017-2659-928378207)
Higa K, Ho T, Tercero F, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 10-year follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7(4):516–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2010.10.019 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.soard.2010.10.01921333610)
Adams TD, Davidson LE, Litwin SE, et al. Health benefits of gastric bypass surgery after 6 years. JAMA. 2012;308(11):1122–31. https://doi.org/10.1001/2012.jama.11164 . (PMID: 10.1001/2012.jama.11164229902713744888)
Adams TD, Davidson LE, Litwin SE, et al. Weight and metabolic outcomes 12 years after gastric bypass. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(12):1143–55. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1700459 . (PMID: 10.1056/NEJMoa1700459289305145737957)
Robert M, Espalieu P, Pelascini E, et al. Efficacy and safety of one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for obesity (YOMEGA): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10178):1299–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30475-1 . Erratum in: Lancet. 2019 Mar 30;393(10178):1298. (PMID: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30475-130851879)
Bhandari M, Nautiyal HK, Kosta S, et al. Comparison of one-anastomosis gastric bypass and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for treatment of obesity: a 5-year study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15(12):2038–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2019.05.025 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.05.02531734066)
O'Brien PE, Hindle A, Brennan L, et al. Long-term outcomes after bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of weight loss at 10 or more years for all bariatric procedures and a single-centre review of 20-year outcomes after adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2019;29(1):3–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3525-0 . (PMID: 10.1007/s11695-018-3525-030293134)
Noun R, Skaff J, Riachi E, et al. One thousand consecutive mini-gastric bypass: short- and long-term outcome. Obes Surg. 2012;22(5):697–703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-012-0618-z . (PMID: 10.1007/s11695-012-0618-z22411569)
Wilson JA, Romagnuolo J, Byrne TK, et al. Predictors of endoscopic findings after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101(10):2194–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00770.x . (PMID: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00770.x17032183)
Coblijn UK, Lagarde SM, de Castro SM, et al. Symptomatic marginal ulcer disease after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: incidence, risk factors and management. Obes Surg. 2015;25(5):805–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-014-1482-9 . (PMID: 10.1007/s11695-014-1482-925381115)
Beaupel N, Bruzzi M, Voron T, et al. Management of acute intra-abdominal sepsis caused by leakage after one anastomosis gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13(8):1297–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2017.04.008 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.soard.2017.04.00828576683)
Genser L, Carandina S, Tabbara M, et al. Presentation and surgical management of leaks after mini-gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(2):305–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2015.06.010 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.soard.2015.06.01026410539)
Liagre A, Queralto M, Juglard G, et al. Multidisciplinary management of leaks after one-anastomosis gastric bypass in a single-center series of 2780 consecutive patients. Obes Surg. 2019;29(5):1452–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-03754-2 . (PMID: 10.1007/s11695-019-03754-230726544)
Tacchino RM. Bowel length: measurement, predictors, and impact on bariatric and metabolic surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(2):328–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2014.09.016 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.09.01625614357)
Nabil TM, Khalil AH, Mikhail S, et al. Conventional versus distal laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass: a randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up. Obes Surg. 2019;29(10):3103–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-03991-5 . (PMID: 10.1007/s11695-019-03991-531177364)
Pizza F, Lucido FS, D'Antonio D, et al. Biliopancreatic limb length in one anastomosis gastric bypass: which is the best? Obes Surg. 2020;30(10):3685–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04687-x . (PMID: 10.1007/s11695-020-04687-x32458362)
Khalaj A, Kalantar Motamedi MA, Mousapour P, et al. Protein-calorie malnutrition requiring revisional surgery after one-anastomosis-mini-gastric bypass (OAGB-MGB): case series from the Tehran Obesity Treatment Study (TOTS). Obes Surg. 2019;29(6):1714–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-03741-7 . (PMID: 10.1007/s11695-019-03741-730706320)
Motamedi MAK, Barzin M, Ebrahimi M, et al. Severe fatal protein malnutrition and liver failure in a morbidly obese patient after mini-gastric bypass surgery: case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2017;33:71–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2017.02.033 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2017.02.033282825995344219)
Eilenberg M, Langer FB, Beer A, et al. Significant liver-related morbidity after bariatric surgery and its reversal-a case series. Obes Surg. 2018;28(3):812–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-017-2925-x . (PMID: 10.1007/s11695-017-2925-x28965313)
Addeo P, Cesaretti M, Anty R, et al. Liver transplantation for bariatric surgery-related liver failure: a systematic review of a rare condition. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15(8):1394–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2019.06.002 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.06.00231285130)
Saarinen T, Pietiläinen KH, Loimaala A, et al. Bile reflux is a common finding in the gastric pouch after one anastomosis gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2020;30(3):875–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-04353-x . (PMID: 10.1007/s11695-019-04353-x31853864)
Bruzzi M, Duboc H, Gronnier C, et al. Long-term evaluation of biliary reflux after experimental one-anastomosis gastric bypass in rats. Obes Surg. 2017;27(4):1119–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-017-2577-x . (PMID: 10.1007/s11695-017-2577-x28205007)
Kassir R, Petrucciani N, Debs T, et al. Conversion of one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) for biliary reflux resistant to medical treatment: lessons learned from a retrospective series of 2780 consecutive patients undergoing OAGB. Obes Surg. 2020;30(6):2093–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04460-0 . (PMID: 10.1007/s11695-020-04460-032052289)
Contributed Indexing:: Keywords: Bile reflux; Biliopancreatic limb length; Gastric bypass; Liver failure; Malnutrition; Mini gastric bypass; One anastomosis gastric bypass; Postoperative complications; Postoperative leak; Revision of one anastomosis gastric bypass
Entry Date(s):: Date Created: 20210131 Date Completed: 20210419 Latest Revision: 20210419
Update Code:: 20240104
DOI:: 10.1007/s11695-021-05249-5
PMID:: 33517557
: Czasopismo naukowe

Full Text Finder

Introduction: One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) has become one of the most commonly performed gastric bypass procedures in some countries.
Objectives: To assess how surgeons viewed the OAGB, perceptions, indications, techniques, and outcomes, as well as the incidence of short- and long-term complications and how they were managed worldwide.
Methods: A questionnaire was sent to all IFSO members in all 5 chapters to study the pattern of practice and outcomes of OAGB.
Results: Seven hundred and forty-two surgeons responded. The most commonly performed procedures were sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), and OAGB. Preoperatively, 70% of the surgeons performed endoscopy routinely. In regards to weight loss, 83% (570 surgeons) responded that OAGB produces better weight loss than SG, and 49% (342 surgeons) responded that OAGB produces better weight loss than RYGB. The most common length of the biliopancreatic limb (BPL) utilized was 200 cm. Sixty-seven percent of surgeons did not measure the total length of the small bowel. In patients with reflux disease and history of smoking, 53% and 22% of surgeons respectively still offered OAGB as a treatment option. Postoperatively, leak was documented in 963 patients, and it was the leading cause for mortality. Leak management was conservative in 35%. Conversion to RYGB was performed in 31%. In 16% the anastomosis was reinforced, 6% of the patients were reversed, and other procedures were performed in 12%. Revision of OAGB for malnutrition/steatorrhea or severe bile reflux was reported at least once by 37% and 45% of surgeons, respectively (200 cm was the most commonly encountered biliopancreatic limb BPL in those revised for malnutrition). Most common strategy for revision was conversion to RYGB (43%), reversal to normal anatomy (32%), shortening of the BPL (20%), and conversion to SG (5%). Nevertheless, 5 out of 98 mortalities (5%) were due to liver failure/malnutrition.
Conclusion: There are infrequent but potentially severe specific complications including malnutrition, liver failure, and bile reflux that may require surgical correction after OAGB.

Informacja