Attempted recall of biographical information influences face attractiveness.

Szczegóły
Abstrakt

Tytuł:: Attempted recall of biographical information influences face attractiveness.
Autorzy:: Grybinas D; Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, MO, 63130, USA. .
Dobbins IG; Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, MO, 63130, USA. .
Źródło:: Psychonomic bulletin & review [Psychon Bull Rev] 2021 Jun; Vol. 28 (3), pp. 953-961. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Feb 02.
Typ publikacji:: Journal Article
Język:: English
Imprint Name(s):: Publication: <2013-> : [New York : Springer]
Original Publication: Austin, TX : Psychonomic Society, Inc., c1994-
MeSH Terms:: Association*
Cues*
Social Perception*
Facial Recognition/*physiology
Mental Recall/*physiology
Adult ; Beauty ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Young Adult
References:: Atkinson, R. C., & Raugh, M. R. (1975). An application of the mnemonic keyword method to the acquisition of a Russian vocabulary. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1(2), 126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.1.2.126. (PMID: 10.1037/0278-7393.1.2.126)
Bar-Anan, Y., & Nosek, B. A. (2012). Reporting intentional rating of the primes predicts priming effects in the affective misattribution procedure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(9), 1194–1208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212446835. (PMID: 10.1177/014616721244683522611055)
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. ArXiv Preprints. Article 1406.5823.
Bornstein, R. F., & D’Agostino, P. R. (1992). Stimulus recognition and the mere exposure effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 545–552. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.545. (PMID: 10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.5451447685)
Bornstein, R. F., & D’Agostino, P. R. (1994). The attribution and discounting of perceptual fluency: Preliminary tests of a perceptual fluency/attributional model of the mere exposure effect. Social Cognition, 12(2), 103–128. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1994.12.2.103. (PMID: 10.1521/soco.1994.12.2.103)
Bruce, V., & Young, A. (1986). Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 77(3), 305–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1986.tb02199.x. (PMID: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1986.tb02199.x3756376)
Chetverikov, A. (2014). Warmth of familiarity and chill of error: Affective consequences of recognition decisions. Cognition and Emotion, 28(3), 385–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2013.833085. (PMID: 10.1080/02699931.2013.83308524044594)
Coleshill, S. G., Binnie, C. D., Morris, R. G., Alarcón, G., van Emde Boas, W., Velis, D. N., … van Rijen, P. C. (2004). Material-specific recognition memory deficits elicited by unilateral hippocampal electrical stimulation. Journal of Neuroscience, 24(7), 1612–1616. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4352-03.2004.
Cooper, P. A., Geldart, S. S., Mondloch, C. J., & Maurer, D. (2006). Developmental changes in perceptions of attractiveness: A role of experience? Developmental Science, 9(5), 530–543. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00520.x. (PMID: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00520.x16911455)
DuBrow, S., Eberts, E. A., & Murty, V. P. (2019). A common mechanism underlying choice’s influence on preference and memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(6), 1958–1966. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01650-5. (PMID: 10.3758/s13423-019-01650-5)
Foo, Y. Z., Simmons, L. W., & Rhodes, G. (2017). Predictors of facial attractiveness and health in humans. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 39731. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep39731. (PMID: 10.1038/srep39731281558975290736)
Grybinas, D., Kantner, J., & Dobbins, I. G. (2019). Mere exposure effect(s) in the context of explicit memory search. Memory & Cognition, 47(7), 1314–1327. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-019-00935-3. (PMID: 10.3758/s13421-019-00935-3)
Herlitz, A., & Lovén, J. (2013). Sex differences and the own-gender bias in face recognition: A meta-analytic review. Visual Cognition, 21(9/10), 1306–1336. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2013.823140. (PMID: 10.1080/13506285.2013.823140)
Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.3. (PMID: 10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.38346328)
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2015). Package ‘lmertest’ (R Package Version 2.0) [Computer software]. https://cran.r-project.org/ . Accessed March-May 2020.
Lawrence, M. A. (2016). ez: Easy analysis and visualization of factorial experiments (R Package Version 4.4-0) [Computer software]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ez . Accessed March-May 2020.
Lee, A. Y. (2001). The mere exposure effect: An uncertainty reduction explanation revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(10), 1255–1266. (PMID: 10.1177/01461672012710002)
Lüdecke, D. (2018). sjPlot: Data visualization for statistics in social science (R Package Version, 2.1) [Computer software]. https://rdrr.io/cran/sjPlot/ . Accessed March-May 2020.
Ma, D. S., Correll, J., & Wittenbrink, B. (2015). The Chicago face database: A free stimulus set of faces and norming data. Behavior Research Methods, 47(4),1122–1135. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0532-5. (PMID: 10.3758/s13428-014-0532-525582810)
McCarty, D. L. (1980). Investigation of a visual imagery mnemonic device for acquiring face–name associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6(2), 145.
Newell, B. R., & Shanks, D. R. (2007). Recognising what you like: Examining the relation between the mere-exposure effect and recognition. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19(1), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440500487454. (PMID: 10.1080/09541440500487454)
Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175. (PMID: 10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175)
Norman, D. A., & Bobrow, D. G. (1979). Descriptions: An intermediate stage in memory retrieval. Cognitive Psychology, 11(1), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(79)90006-9. (PMID: 10.1016/0010-0285(79)90006-9)
Peirce, J. W. (2007). PsychoPy—Psychophysics software in Python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162(1/2), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.11.017. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.11.017172546362018741)
Rajaram, S., Srinivas, K., & Roediger III, H. L. (1998). A transfer-appropriate processing account of context effects in word-fragment completion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(4), 993.
Rhodes, G., Proffitt, F., Grady, J. M., & Sumich, A. (1998). Facial symmetry and the perception of beauty. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5(4), 659–669. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208842. (PMID: 10.3758/BF03208842)
Robinson, D. (2017). broom: Convert statistical analysis objects into tidy data frames (R Package Version 0.4, 2) [Computer software]. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/broom/index.html . Accessed March-May 2020.
Robotham, R. J., & Starrfelt, R. (2017). Face and word recognition can be selectively affected by brain injury or developmental disorders. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01547.
Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1999). Facial attractiveness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(12), 452–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01403-5. (PMID: 10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01403-510562724)
Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80(5), 352–373. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0020071. (PMID: 10.1037/h0020071)
Wickham, H. (2017). tidyverse: Easily install and load the ‘tidyverse’ (R Package Version 1.2.1, 1(1)) [Computer software]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tidyverse . Accessed March-May 2020.
Woodhead, M. M., & Baddeley, A. D. (1981). Individual differences and memory for faces, pictures, and words. Memory & Cognition, 9(4), 368–370. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197561. (PMID: 10.3758/BF03197561)
Yonelinas, A. P., Kroll, N. E. A., Dobbins, I. G., & Soltani, M. (1999). Recognition memory for faces: When familiarity supports associative recognition judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6(4), 654–661. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212975. (PMID: 10.3758/BF03212975)
Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2, Pt. 2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025848. (PMID: 10.1037/h0025848)
Contributed Indexing:: Keywords: Cued recall; Emotion; Encoding effects; Memory
Entry Date(s):: Date Created: 20210202 Date Completed: 20210721 Latest Revision: 20210721
Update Code:: 20240104
DOI:: 10.3758/s13423-021-01877-1
PMID:: 33528819
: Czasopismo naukowe

Full Text Finder

We examined affective consequences arising from the kinds of memory retrieval failures that often accompany social interaction. To do so, we measured the influence of cued-recall outcomes for biographical information on the rated attractiveness of faces. The data demonstrate that retrieval of names (Experiment 1a) and professions (Experiment 1b) increases the rated attractiveness of target faces relative to faces that failed to produce recall of associative information. This was predicted by a confirmation of search (COS) model originally developed on verbal memoranda, which assumes that confirmation bias during memory search leads to affective consequences depending upon retrieval's success or failure. The current study extends this model, showing that evaluative judgments of individuals are in part contingent upon the memory retrieval skills of their assessors. We conclude by discussing potential extensions of the COS paradigm to the measurement of implicit attitudes and special populations.

Informacja