Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Przeglądasz jako GOŚĆ
Tytuł pozycji:

Smear layer removal and sealer penetration with different tapers after using photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming technique.

Tytuł :
Smear layer removal and sealer penetration with different tapers after using photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming technique.
Autorzy :
Eldeeb IM; Department of Endodontics, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Nawar NN; Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, The British University, 81-11-11 El-Rehab, Cairo, 11841, Egypt.
Saber SM; Department of Endodontics, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. .; Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, The British University, 81-11-11 El-Rehab, Cairo, 11841, Egypt. .
Hassanein EE; Department of Endodontics, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Schäfer E; Central Interdisciplinary Ambulance in the School of Dentistry, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Pokaż więcej
Źródło :
Clinical oral investigations [Clin Oral Investig] 2021 Feb 04. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Feb 04.
Publication Model :
Ahead of Print
Typ publikacji :
Journal Article
Język :
English
Imprint Name(s) :
Publication: Berlin : Springer-Verlag
Original Publication: Berlin : Springer, c1997-
References :
Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN (2008) Clinical implications and microbiology of bacterial persistence after treatment procedures. J Endod 34:1291–1301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.07.028. (PMID: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.07.02818928835)
Violich DR, Chandler NP (2010) The smear layer in endodontics – a review. Int Endod J 43:2–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01627.x. (PMID: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01627.x20002799)
White RR, Goldman M, Lin PS (1987) The influence of the smeared layer upon dentinal tubule penetration by endodontic filling materials. Part II. J Endod 13:369–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(87)80195-4. (PMID: 10.1016/S0099-2399(87)80195-43481803)
Kokkas AB, Boutsioukis A, Vassiliadis LP, Stavrianos CK (2004) The influence of the smear layer on dentinal tubule penetration depth by three different root canal sealers: an in vitro study. J Endod 30:100–102. (PMID: 10.1097/00004770-200402000-00009)
Stojicic S, Zivkovic S, Qian W, Zhang H, Haapasalo M (2010) Tissue dissolution by sodium hypochlorite: effect of concentration, temperature, agitation, and surfactant. J Endod 36:1558–1562. (PMID: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.06.021)
Slutzky-Goldberg I, Hanut A, Matalon S, Baev V, Slutzky H (2013) The effect of dentin on the pulp tissue dissolution capacity of sodium hypochlorite and calcium hydroxide. J Endod 39:980–983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.04.040. (PMID: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.04.04023880263)
Haapasalo M, Wang Z, Shen Y, Curtis A, Patel P, Khakpour M (2014) Tissue dissolution by a novel multisonic ultracleaning system and sodium hypochlorite. J Endod 40:1178–1181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.12.029. (PMID: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.12.02925069928)
Macedo RG, Verhaagen B, Fernandez Rivas D, Gardeniers JGE, van der Sluis LWM, Wesselink PR, Versluis M (2014) Sonochemical and high-speed optical characterization of cavitation generated by an ultrasonically oscillating dental file in root canal models. Ultrason Sonochem 21:324–335. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2013.03.001)
Do QL, Gaudin A (2020) The Efficiency of the Er: YAG Laser and PhotonInduced Photoacoustic Streaming (PIPS) as an Activation Method in Endodontic Irrigation: A Literature Review. J Lasers Med Sci 11(3):316–334. (PMID: 10.34172/jlms.2020.53)
Al Shahrani M, DiVito E, Hughes CV, Nathanson D, Huang GT (2014) Enhanced removal of Enterococcus faecalis biofilms in the root canal using sodium hypochlorite plus photon-induced photoacoustic streaming: an in vitro study. Photomed Laser Surg 32(5):260–266. (PMID: 10.1089/pho.2014.3714)
Matsumoto H, Yoshimine Y, Akamine A (2011) Visualization of irrigant flow and cavitation induced by Er:YAG laser within a root canal model. J Endod 37:839–843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.02.035. (PMID: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.02.03521787501)
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A (2007) G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 39:175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146. (PMID: 10.3758/bf0319314617695343)
Özyürek U, Erdoğan O, Türker SA (2018) Effect of calcium hydroxide dressing on the dentinal tubule penetration of 2 different root canal sealers: a confocal laser scanning microscopic study. J Endod 44:1018–1023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.02.016. (PMID: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.02.016)
Sippus J, Gutknecht N (2019) Deep disinfection and tubular smear layer removal with Er: YAG using photon-induced photoacoustic streaming (PIPS) contra laser-activated irrigation (LAI) technics. Lasers Dent Sci 3:37–42. (PMID: 10.1007/s41547-018-0050-3)
Lloyd A, Uhles JP, Clement DJ, Garcia-Godoy F (2014) Elimination of intracanal tissue and debris through a novel laser-activated system assessed using high-resolution micro–computed tomography: a pilot study. J Endod 40:584–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.10.040. (PMID: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.10.04024666917)
Goel S, Tewari S (2009) Smear layer removal with passive ultrasonic irrigation and the NaviTip FX: a scanning electron microscopic study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 108:465–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.04.023. (PMID: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.04.02319576804)
Hülsmann M, Rümmelin C, Schäfers F (1997) Root canal cleanliness after preparation with different endodontic handpieces and hand instruments: a comparative SEM investigation. J Endod 23:301–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(97)80410-4. (PMID: 10.1016/S0099-2399(97)80410-49545932)
Viapiana R, Guerreiro-Tanomaru J, Tanomaru-Filho M, Camilleri J (2014) Interface of dentine to root canal sealers. J Dent 42:336–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.11.013. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.11.01324287256)
Machado R, Cruz ATG, de Araujo BMM, Klemz AA, Klug HP, da Silva Neto UX (2018) Tubular dentin sealer penetration after different final irrigation protocols: A confocal laser scanning microscopy study. Microsc Res Tech 81:649–654. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.23019. (PMID: 10.1002/jemt.2301929573039)
You-Ji L, Wei C (2011) Photocatalytic degradation of Rhodamine B using nanocrystalline TiO2–zeolite surface composite catalysts: effects of photocatalytic condition on degradation efficiency. Catal Sci Technol 1:802–809. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1CY00012H. (PMID: 10.1039/C1CY00012H)
Ali MA, Moghaddasi J, Ahmed SA (1991) Temperature effects in rhodamine by dyes and improvement in CW dye laser performance. Laser Chem 11:31–38. (PMID: 10.1155/LC.11.31)
Lubart R, Kesler G, Lavie R, Friedmann H (2005) Er:YAG laser promotes gingival wound repair by photo-dissociating water molecules. Photomed Laser Surg 23:369–372. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2005.23.369. (PMID: 10.1089/pho.2005.23.36916144478)
Saber SE, Schäfer E (2016) Incidence of dentinal defects after preparation of severely curved root canals using the Reciproc single-file system with and without prior creation of a glide path. Int Endod J 49(11):1057–1064. (PMID: 10.1111/iej.12555)
George R, Rutley EB, Walsh LJ (2008) Evaluation of Smear layer: a comparison of automated image analysis versus expert observers. J Endod 34:999–1002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.05.003. (PMID: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.05.00318634934)
Kayaoglu G, Erten H, Alaçam T, Ørstavik D (2005) Short-term antibacterial activity of root canal sealers towards Enterococcus faecalis. Int Endod J 38:483–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.00981.x. (PMID: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.00981.x15946270)
Generali L, Cavani F, Serena V, Pettenati C, Bertoldi C (2017) Effect of different irrigation systems on sealer penetration into dentinal tubules. J Endod 43:652–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.12.004. (PMID: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.12.00428342477)
Deniz Sungur D, Purali N, Cosgun E, Calt S (2016) Push-out bond strength and dentinal tubule penetration of different root canal sealers used with coated core materials. Restor Dent Endod 41:114–120. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2016.41.2.114. (PMID: 10.5395/rde.2016.41.2.114272002794868874)
Gharib SR, Tordik PA, Imamura GM, Baginski TA, Goodell GG (2007) A confocal laser scanning microscope investigation of the epiphany obturation system. J Endod 33:957–961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.03.011. (PMID: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.03.01117878082)
Pratap VB, Madhu varma K, Girija Sajjan S, Kalyan Satish R (2016) Effect of 810 nm diode laser disinfection on bond strength of resin sealer to radicular dentin –an in vitro study. IJCAR 5:723–725.
Esteves-Oliveira M, de Guglielmi CA, Ramalho KM, Arana-Chavez VE, de Eduardo CP (2010) Comparison of dentin root canal permeability and morphology after irradiation with Nd:YAG, Er:YAG, and diode lasers. Lasers Med Sci 25:755–760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-010-0775-z. (PMID: 10.1007/s10103-010-0775-z20422240)
Lopes FC, Roperto R, Akkus A, Akkus O, Souza-Gabriel AE, Sousa-Neto MD (2016) Effects of different lasers on organic/inorganic ratio of radicular dentin. Lasers Med Sci 31:415–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-015-1862-y. (PMID: 10.1007/s10103-015-1862-y26796704)
Garberoglio R, Brannstrom M (1976) Scanning electron microscopic investigation of human dentinal tubules. Arch Oral Biol 21:355–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-9969(76)80003-9. (PMID: 10.1016/s0003-9969(76)80003-91066114)
Ribeiro RG, Marchesan MA, Silva RG, Sousa-Neto MD, Pécora JD (2010) Dentin permeability of the apical third in different groups of teeth. Braz Dent J 21:216–219. (PMID: 10.1590/S0103-64402010000300007)
Bolles JA, He J, Svoboda KKH, Schneiderman E, Glickman GN (2013) Comparison of Vibringe, EndoActivator and needle irrigation on sealer penetration in extracted human teeth. J Endod 39:708–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.01.006. (PMID: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.01.00623611397)
Kara Tuncer A, Unal B (2014) Comparison of sealer penetration using the EndoVac irrigation system and conventional needle root canal irrigation. J Endod 40:613–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.11.017. (PMID: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.11.01724767552)
Contributed Indexing :
Keywords: Activation; Apical taper; EDTA; PIPS; Sealer penetration; Smear layer; Sodium hypochlorite
Entry Date(s) :
Date Created: 20210204 Latest Revision: 20210204
Update Code :
20210210
DOI :
10.1007/s00784-021-03813-y
PMID :
33538899
Czasopismo naukowe
Objective: To evaluate the effect of the photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming (PIPS) technique on irrigation performance with different instrumentation tapers in root canals regarding smear layer removal and subsequent sealer penetration.
Materials and Methods: One hundred twenty human mandibular molars were divided into three equal groups according to the apical preparation taper (25/4%, 25/6%, and 25/8%). Each group was divided into two equal subgroups, one received passive irrigation (PI) while the other received PIPS activation of 2.5% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA. Half the samples were evaluated using electron microscope images to assess smear layer removal. The other half was obturated using gutta-percha and rhodamine B-labeled AH Plus sealer before being sectioned horizontally at different root levels (coronal, middle, and apical) to evaluate the percentage of sealer penetration using CLSM. Mann-Whitney U and Friedman tests were used to analyze smear layer scores, while sealer penetration data were analyzed using the three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's post hoc test.
Results: Statistical analysis showed significantly better smear layer removal and better sealer penetration after PIPS activation when corresponding root thirds were compared (P<0.001). Only exception was sealer penetration in the apical third with root canal preparation of 25/4% where the difference between the irrigation methods was statistically insignificant (P>0.05).
Conclusions: The use of PIPS activation in the final irrigation protocol enhanced smear layer removal and sealer penetration into dentinal tubules if the taper of the prepared canal was at least 6%.
Clinical Relevance: Increasing apical preparation taper significantly enhances PIPS performance in terms of irrigation activation thus enhancing smear layer removal and subsequent sealer penetration in dentinal tubules.

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies