Long-term Implications of Post-Procedural Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Pressure in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Current risk models have only limited accuracy in predicting transcatheter aortic valve Implantation (TAVI) outcomes and there is a paucity of clinical variables to guide patient management after the procedure. The prognostic impact of elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) in TAVI patients is unknown. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the prognostic value of after-procedural LVEDP in patients who undewent TAVI. Consecutive patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis who undewent TAVI were divided into 2 groups according to after-procedural LVEDP above and below or equal 12 mm Hg. Collected data included baseline clinical, laboratory and echocardiographic variables. We evaluated the impact of elevated vs. normal LVEDP on in-hospital outcomes, short- and long-term mortality. Eight hundred forty-five patients were included in the study with complete in-hospital and late mortality data available for all survivors (median follow-up 29.5 months [IQR 16.5 to 48.0]). The mean age (±SD) was 82.3±6.2 years and mean Society of Thoracic Surgery score was 4.0%±3.0%. Patients with LVEDP>12 mm Hg (n = 591, 70%) and LVEDP≤12 mm Hg (n = 254, 30%) had a 6-months mortality rate of 6.8% and 2%, respectively (P=0.004) and a 1-year mortality rate of 10.1% vs 4.9%, respectively (p = 0.017). By multivariable analysis, after-procedural LVEDP>12 mm Hg was independently associated with all-cause mortality (HR 2.45, 95% CI 1.58 to 3.76, p <0.001) during long-term follow-up. In conclusion, elevated after-procedural LVEDP in patients who undewent TAVI is an independent predictor of mortality following TAVI. Further research regarding the use of LVEDP as a tool for after-procedural medical management is warranted.
Competing Interests: Disclosures Ariel Finkelstein reports receiving consultation fees from Medtronic and Edwards Lifesciences. Amir Halkin reports receiving consultation fees from Abbott Laboratories and Boston Scientific. All other authors have no conflict of interests to declare.
(Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)