Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Przeglądasz jako GOŚĆ
Tytuł pozycji:

Posthospitalization follow-up recommendations after pediatric critical illness due to respiratory failure.

Tytuł :
Posthospitalization follow-up recommendations after pediatric critical illness due to respiratory failure.
Autorzy :
Yagiela LM; Division of Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Michigan, Detroit, Michigan, USA.; Department of Pediatrics, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, Michigan, USA.
Pfarr MA; Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Meert KL; Division of Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Michigan, Detroit, Michigan, USA.; Department of Pediatrics, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, Michigan, USA.
Odetola FO; Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.; Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.; Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Pokaż więcej
Źródło :
Pediatric pulmonology [Pediatr Pulmonol] 2021 Feb 28. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Feb 28.
Publication Model :
Ahead of Print
Typ publikacji :
Journal Article
Język :
English
Imprint Name(s) :
Publication: <2005-> : Hoboken, NJ : Wiley-Liss
Original Publication: [Philadelphia, PA] : W.B. Saunders, [c1985-
References :
Yagiela LM, Barbaro RP, Quasney MW, et al. Outcomes and patterns of healthcare utilization after hospitalization for pediatric critical illness due to respiratory failure. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019;20(2):120-127.
McPherson ML, Lairson DR, Smith EO, Brody BA, Jefferson LS. Noncompliance with medical follow-up after pediatric intensive care. Pediatrics. 2002;109(6):e94.
Rennick JE, Johnston CC, Dougherty G, Platt R, Ritchie JA. Children's psychological responses after critical illness and exposure to invasive technology. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2002;23(3):133-144.
Ebrahim S, Singh S, Hutchison JS, et al. Adaptive behavior, functional outcomes, and quality of life outcomes of children requiring urgent ICU admission. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013;14(1):10-18.
Rees G, Gledhill J, Garralda ME, Nadel S. Psychiatric outcome following paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission: a cohort study. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30(8):1607-1614.
Pollack MM, Holubkov R, Funai T, et al. Simultaneous prediction of new morbidity, mortality, and survival without new morbidity from pediatric intensive care: a new paradigm for outcomes assessment. Crit Care Med. 2015;43(8):1699-1709.
Pollack MM, Holubkov R, Funai T, et al. Pediatric intensive care outcomes: development of new morbidities during pediatric critical care. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2014;15(9):821-827.
Pinto NP, Rhinesmith EW, Kim TY, Ladner PH, Pollack MM. Long-term function after pediatric critical illness: results from the survivor outcomes study. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017;18(3):e122-e130.
Colville G, Pierce C. Patterns of post-traumatic stress symptoms in families after paediatric intensive care. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38(9):1523-1531.
Mitchell RB, Hussey HM, Setzen G, et al. Clinical consensus statement: tracheostomy care. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;148(1):6-20.
Benitz WE, Committee on Fetus Newborn, American Academy of Pediatrics. Hospital stay for healthy term newborn infants. Pediatrics. 2015;135(5):948-953.
Feudtner C, Hays RM, Haynes G, Geyer JR, Neff JM, Koepsell TD. Deaths attributed to pediatric complex chronic conditions: national trends and implications for supportive care services. Pediatrics. 2001;107(6):E99.
Pollack MM, Patel KM, Ruttimann UE. Prism III: an updated pediatric risk of mortality score. Crit Care Med. 1996;24(5):743-752.
Bronner MB, Peek N, Knoester H, Bos AP, Last BF, Grootenhuis MA. Course and predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder in parents after pediatric intensive care treatment of their child. J Pediatr Psychol. 2010;35(9):966-974.
Medical Home Initiatives for Children With Special Needs Project Advisory Committee. American Academy of Pediatrics. The medical home. Pediatrics. 2002;110(1 pt 1):184-186.
Boucher V, Mathy C, Lacroix J, Emeriaud G, Jouvet P, Tse SM. Post-discharge respiratory outcomes of children with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2020;55(2):468-473.
Yu YR, Carpenter JL, DeMello AS, et al. Evaluating quality of life of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation survivors using the pediatric quality of life inventory survey. J Pediatr Surg. 2018;53(5):1060-1064.
Mallory PP, Selewski DT, Askenazi DJ, et al. Acute kidney injury, fluid overload, and outcomes in children supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for a respiratory indication. ASAIO J. 2020;66(3):319-326.
Fleming GM, Sahay R, Zappitelli M, et al. The incidence of acute kidney injury and its effect on neonatal and pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation outcomes: a multicenter report from the kidney intervention during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation study group. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016;17(12):1157-1169.
Berry JG, Blaine K, Rogers J, et al. A framework of pediatric hospital discharge care informed by legislation, research, and practice. JAMA Pediatr. 2014;168(10):955-962.
Prinjha S, Field K, Rowan K. What patients think about ICU follow-up services: a qualitative study. Crit Care. 2009;13(2):R46.
Kjer CKW, Estrup S, Poulsen LM, Mathiesen O. Follow-up after intensive care treatment: a questionnaire survey of intensive care aftercare in denmark. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2017;61(8):925-934.
Huggins EL, Bloom SL, Stollings JL, Camp M, Sevin CM, Jackson JC. A clinic model: post-intensive care syndrome and post-intensive care syndrome-family. AACN Adv Crit Care. 2016;27(2):204-211.
Griffiths JA, Barber VS, Cuthbertson BH, Young JD. A national survey of intensive care follow-up clinics. Anesthesia. 2006;61(10):950-955.
Egerod I, Risom SS, Thomsen T, et al. Icu-recovery in Scandinavia: a comparative study of intensive care follow-up in Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2013;29(2):103-111.
Contributed Indexing :
Keywords: critical care outcomes; follow-up; outcome assessment (health care)/methods; pediatric; pediatric intensive care units; survivor
Entry Date(s) :
Date Created: 20210301 Latest Revision: 20210313
Update Code :
20210314
DOI :
10.1002/ppul.25343
PMID :
33644972
Czasopismo naukowe
Objectives: To characterize the recommended posthospitalization follow-up by provider type and location after a pediatric critical illness due to respiratory failure.
Working Hypothesis: After pediatric critical illness due to respiratory failure, patients will not have a standard follow-up pattern with regard to provider type or follow-up location.
Study Design: A retrospective cohort study.
Subject Selection: Children, 18 years or younger, admitted to a quaternary care pediatric intensive care unit with respiratory failure between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2014.
Methodology: For eligible patients, recommendations for posthospitalization follow-up including provider type (primary care and specialty care) and location (community care center vs. tertiary care center) were characterized from medical chart review. Recommendations were examined for all patients and two patient subgroups (patients who received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and patients with tracheostomy).
Results: Of 155 patients alive at hospital discharge, the median age was 2.1 (interquartile range, 0.7-10.6) years. Eighty percent of patients were instructed to follow-up with a primary care provider but only 52.9% with a pulmonologist. We found 10 unique follow-up patterns between provider location (community care center, tertiary care center, or both) and global provider type (primary care versus specialty care). Primary care follow-up was recommended more often at community locations (74.2%), whereas specialty care was more often recommended at tertiary care centers (68.6%).
Conclusions: Our study findings demonstrate significant variability in the recommendations for follow-up by provider type and location after hospitalization for acute respiratory failure and highlight areas for improvement in follow-up care after pediatric critical illness.
(© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies