Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

Out of the Loop: The Value of a Preoperative Loopogram for Colostomy Reversal in Trauma.

Tytuł:
Out of the Loop: The Value of a Preoperative Loopogram for Colostomy Reversal in Trauma.
Autorzy:
Morare NMT; University of Witwatersrand, Parktown, Johannesburg, 2193, South Africa. .
Motha MN; University of Witwatersrand, Parktown, Johannesburg, 2193, South Africa.
Moeng MS; University of Witwatersrand, Parktown, Johannesburg, 2193, South Africa.; Academic Head of Trauma, Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital, Parktown, Johannesburg, 2193, South Africa.
Źródło:
World journal of surgery [World J Surg] 2021 Jul; Vol. 45 (7), pp. 2009-2014. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Mar 15.
Typ publikacji:
Journal Article
Język:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Original Publication: New York, Springer International.
MeSH Terms:
Colostomy*
Wounds, Gunshot*
Anastomosis, Surgical ; Humans ; Postoperative Complications/surgery ; Reoperation ; Retrospective Studies ; South Africa
References:
Ahmad N, Khan A, Abid K, Shah S (2004) Role of barium enema preceding colostomy closure in trauma patients is limited and challengeable. Ann King Edward Med Univ. https://doi.org/10.21649/akemu.v10i4.1216. (PMID: 10.21649/akemu.v10i4.1216)
Ballian N et al (2009) Routine evaluation of the distal colon remnant before Hartmann’s reversal is not necessary in asymptomatic patients. J Gastrointest Surg 13(12):2260–2267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-009-0987-3. (PMID: 10.1007/s11605-009-0987-3197279774822704)
Hanna MH, Vinci A, Pigazzi A (2015) Diverting ileostomy in colorectal surgery: when is it necessary? Langenbecks Arch Surg 400(2):145–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-015-1275-1. (PMID: 10.1007/s00423-015-1275-125633276)
Qamar A (2010) Indications and complications of intestinal stomas -a tertiary care hospital experience. Biomedica 26:144–147.
Shabbir J, Britton DC (2010) Stoma complications: a literature overview. Colorectal Dis 12(10):958–964. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.02006.x. (PMID: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.02006.x19604288)
Pasquale M, Fabian TC (1998) Practice management guidelines for trauma from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. J Trauma 44(6):941–957. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199806000-00001. (PMID: 10.1097/00005373-199806000-000019637148)
Kundagulwar G, Pai V, Saklani A (2016) Role of distal loopogram before defunctioning stoma reversal- results from an Indian tertiary-care center. Cancer Ther Oncol Int J. https://doi.org/10.19080/CTOIJ.2016.01.555574. (PMID: 10.19080/CTOIJ.2016.01.555574)
Mohan T, Prasuna B, Ali W, Madhusudhan Ch, Reddy R (2015) Barium peritonitis following distal ileal loopogram. J Evol Med Dent Sci 4(28):4920–4922. https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds/2015/717. (PMID: 10.14260/jemds/2015/717)
Williams SM, Harned RK (1991) Recognition and prevention of barium enema complications. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 20(4):123–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/0363-0188(91)90017-v. (PMID: 10.1016/0363-0188(91)90017-v1889235)
Kim JY (2015) Should a contrast enema be performed before reversal of a diverting stoma in lower rectal surgery? Ann Coloproctol 31(4):117–118. https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2015.31.4.117. (PMID: 10.3393/ac.2015.31.4.117263616104564660)
Sherman KL, Wexner SD (2017) Considerations in stoma reversal, (in eng). Clin Colon Rectal Surg 30(3):172–177. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1598157. (PMID: 10.1055/s-0037-1598157286849345498167)
Habib K, Gupta A, White D, Mazari FA, Wilson TR (2015) Utility of contrast enema to assess anastomotic integrity and the natural history of radiological leaks after low rectal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 30(8):1007–1014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-015-2225-7. (PMID: 10.1007/s00384-015-2225-725922145)
Larsson A, Lindmark G, Syk I, Buchwald P (2015) Water soluble contrast enema examination of the integrity of the rectal anastomosis prior to loop ileostomy reversal may be superfluous. Int J Colorectal Dis 30(3):381–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-014-2113-6. (PMID: 10.1007/s00384-014-2113-625598042)
Goetz A, da Silva NPB, Moser C, Agha A, Dendl LM, Stroszczynski C, Schreyer AG (2017) Clinical value of contrast enema prior to ileostomy closure. RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren. 189(9):855–863. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-111598. (PMID: 10.1055/s-0043-111598)
Piccinni G, Palmisano S, Casagranda B, Balani A, de Manzini N (2011) The reversal of a protective stoma is feasible before the complete healing of a colorectal anastomotic leak. Am Surg 77(12):1619–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/000313481107701232. (PMID: 10.1177/00031348110770123222273219)
Seo SI, Lee JL, Park SH, Ha HK, Kim JC (2015) Assessment by using a water-soluble contrast enema study of radiologic leakage in lower rectal cancer patients with sphincter-saving surgery. Ann Coloproctol 31(4):131–137. https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2015.31.4.131. (PMID: 10.3393/ac.2015.31.4.131263616144564664)
Hendren S, Hammond K, Glasgow SC, Perry WB, Buie WD, Steele SR, Rafferty J (2015) Clinical practice guidelines for ostomy surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 58(4):375–387. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000347. (PMID: 10.1097/DCR.000000000000034725751793)
Bowley D, Boffard K, Vellema J, Moeng M (2002) Seroprevalence of human immunodeficiency virus in major trauma patients in Johannesburg. S Afr Med J 92:792–793. (PMID: 12432801)
Simbayi L, Zuma K, Zhungu N, Moyo S (2019) South African National HIV prevalence, incidence, behaviour and communication survey, 2017.
Khair G, Alhamarneh O, Avery J, Cast J, Gunn J et al (2007) Routine use of gastrograffin enema prior to the reversal of a loop ileostomy. Dig Surg 24(5):338–341. https://doi.org/10.1159/000107713. (PMID: 10.1159/00010771317785976)
Healthman. Healthman radiography & sonography costing guide. https://www.healthman.co.za/Tariffs/Tariffs2018 . Accessed 14 Jan 2021.
Godat L, Kobayashi L, Chang DC, Coimbra R (2014) Do trauma stomas ever get reversed? J Am Coll Surg 219(1):70–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.02.024. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.02.02424862884)
Velmahos G, Degiannis E, Wells M, Souter I, Saadia R (1995) Early closure of colostomies in trauma patients-a prospective randomized trial. Surgery 118:815–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6060(05)80270-3. (PMID: 10.1016/S0039-6060(05)80270-37482267)
Silva MA, Ratnayake G, Deen KI (2003) Quality of life of stoma patients: temporary ileostomy versus colostomy. World J Surg 27(4):421–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-002-6699-4. (PMID: 10.1007/s00268-002-6699-412658485)
Boraii S (2017) A descriptive study to assess quality of life in Egyptian patients with a stoma. Ostomy Wound Manage 63(7):28–33. (PMID: 28759426)
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20210316 Date Completed: 20210628 Latest Revision: 20210927
Update Code:
20240104
DOI:
10.1007/s00268-021-06064-w
PMID:
33723670
Czasopismo naukowe
Background: Stoma is occasionally fashioned during trauma surgery. A loopogram is routinely conducted in the surgical planning for stoma reversal. This is associated with medical and cost implications. A study was undertaken to evaluate the influence of loopograms on the management of trauma patients at a Johannesburg hospital.
Methods: A retrospective analysis of records in the stoma database (January 2013 to December 2018) was conducted. The patient demographics, method of injury, stoma-type, loopogram findings and post-operative courses were analysed.
Results: 112 records were obtained. 9 (8%) patients were excluded for pending investigations or surgery. 13 (11.6%) patients were excluded for incomplete data. The remaining 90 (80.3%) patients, with a mean age of 32.9 had non-contributory loopograms and underwent a reversal procedure. 43 (47.8%) had a loop colostomy while 47 (52.2%) had undergone a Hartmann's procedure. Mechanism of injury was stab wounds (81.4%L; 61.7%H); gunshot wounds (13.9%L; 29.7%H) and blunt trauma (L5% and 9%H). The post-operative complication rate was 30% for the loop group (2.3% ≥ Clavien-Dindo 3) and 25.5% for the Hartmann's group (4% ≥ Clavien-Dindo 3). The average timing to reversal was 38 weeks (range 12-60) in the Hartmann's group and 22 weeks (range 12-32) the loop colostomy group.
Conclusion: Significant findings are infrequent on loopogram for trauma patients. When these findings are detected, the effect on management is questionable. They are not without complications and have cost and time implications. Loopograms are helpful in selective cases rather than as a routine investigation, particularly in resource-limited settings.

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies