Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

Qualitative study of the influence of horse-owner relationship during some key events within a horse's lifetime.

Tytuł:
Qualitative study of the influence of horse-owner relationship during some key events within a horse's lifetime.
Autorzy:
Clough H; School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Loughborough, UK.
Roshier M; School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Loughborough, UK.
England G; School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Loughborough, UK.
Burford J; School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Loughborough, UK.
Freeman S; School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Loughborough, UK.
Źródło:
The Veterinary record [Vet Rec] 2021 Mar; Vol. 188 (6), pp. e79. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jan 28.
Typ publikacji:
Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Język:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Publication: 2021- : [Oxford] : Wiley
Original Publication: -June 2009 : London : British Veterinary Medicine
MeSH Terms:
Decision Making*
Human-Animal Bond*
Ownership*
Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Animals ; Female ; Horses ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Qualitative Research ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Young Adult
References:
Horseman S, Whay B, Mullan S, Knowles T, Barr A, Buller H. Horses in our hands: the welfare challenges facing the UK's equine population. 2016. http://www.worldhorsewelfare.org/survey-equine-welfare-england-and-wales. Accessed 13 March 2020.
Slater J. National equine health survey (NEHS) 2016) blue cross for pets 2016. 2016. https://www.bluecross.org.uk/sites/default/files/downloads/NEHS%20results%202016%2022%20Sept%202016.pdf. Accessed 13 September 2016.
Hotchkiss JW, Reid SW, Christley RM. A survey of horse owners in Great Britain regarding horses in their care. Part 1: horse demographic characteristics and management. Equine Vet J. 2007;39(4):294-300.
Clough HGR, Burford JH, Roshier A, England GCW, Freeman SL. A scoping review of the current literature exploring the nature of the horse-human relationship. Vet Evidence. 2019;4(4). https://doi.org/10.18849/ve.v4i4.240.
Campbell S, Greenwood M, Prior S, Shearer T, Walkem K, Young S, et al. Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples. J Res Nurs. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206.
Etikan I, Alkassim R, Abubakar S. Comparision of snowball sampling and sequential sampling technique. Biom Biostat Int J. 2016;3.6-7.
Laverty SM. Hermeneutic phenomenology and phenomenology: a comparison of historical and methodological considerations. Int J Qual Methods. 2003;2(3):21-35.
Green JNT. Qualitative methods for health research. London, UK: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2009.
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77-101.
Scantlebury CE, Perkins E, Pinchbeck GL, Archer DC, Christley RM. Could it be colic? Horse-owner decision making and practices in response to equine colic. BMC Vet Res. 2014;10(Suppl 1):S1.
Kubinyi E, Turcsán B, Miklósi A. Dog and owner demographic characteristics and dog personality trait associations. Behav Processes. 2009;81(3):392-401.
Charles N, Davies CA. My family and other animals: pets as kin. In: Carter B, Charles N, editors. Human and other animals. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan; 2011.
Craigon PJ, Hobson-West P, England GCW, Whelan C, Lethbridge E, Asher L. “She's a dog at the end of the day”: guide dog owners' perspectives on the behaviour of their guide dog. PLoS One. 2017;12(4):e0176018.
Holbrook MB, Stephens DL, Day E, Holbrook SM, Strazar G. A collective stereographic photo essay on key aspects of animal companionship: the truth about dogs and cats. Acad Mark Sci Rev. 2001;1(1):1-16.
Keaveney SM. Equines and their human companions. J Bus Res. 2008;61(5):444-54.
Robinson IH. The human-horse relationship: how much do we know? Equine Vet J. 1999;31(S28):42-5.
McGowan TW, Phillips CJC, Hodgson DR, Perkins N, McGowan CM. Euthanasia in aged horses: relationship between the owner's personality and their opinions on, and experience of, euthanasia of horses. Anthrozoös. 2012;25(3):261-75.
McGowan CM, Ireland JL. Welfare, quality of Life, and euthanasia of aged horses. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract. 2016;32(2):355-67.
Cookson S. Friends at the end. Equine Health. 2017;2017(38):46-7.
Dawson SE. Companion animal euthanasia: the lived paradox of the human-companion animal bond. Manchester, UK: Manchester Metropolitan University; 2007.
Adams CL, Bonnett BN, Meek AH. Predictors of owner response to companion animal death in 177 clients from 14 practices in Ontario. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2000;217(9):1303-9.
Cornell KK, Kopcha M. Client-veterinarian communication: skills for client centered dialogue and shared decision making. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Prac. 2007;37(1):37-47.
Chewning B, Bylund CL, Shah B, Arora NK, Gueguen JA, Makoul G. Patient preferences for shared decisions: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;86(1):9-18.
Kerrigan L. Anticipating grief - the role of pre-euthanasia discussions. Vet Nurse. 2014;5(5):236-43.
Sheridan L, Tottey H. A compassionate journey part 2: the pet's passing. Vet Nurse. 2016;7(9):500-7.
Contributed Indexing:
Keywords: decision-making; euthanasia; horse owner; interview; purchase; thematic analysis
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20210319 Date Completed: 20210616 Latest Revision: 20210616
Update Code:
20240105
DOI:
10.1002/vetr.79
PMID:
33739494
Czasopismo naukowe
Background: There is a lack of research exploring how the horse-human relationship influences horse owners' decision-making. The aim of this study was to investigate how an owner's relationship with their horse affects decisions around key events during their horse's lifetime.
Methods: An online survey and semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with horse-owners. The online survey asked horse owners about their experiences of decision-making and their relationship with their horse and identified interview participants. Two semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 horse owners on their experience of purchasing and euthanasia of horses. Interviews were recorded and transcribed, and thematic analysis was performed.
Results: There were 938 responses to the online survey. The majority of owners considered their horse to be a member of the family (92.9%, 808/870). The mean amount spent annually on their horse was £9215 (range £324-14,240). Seven themes were identified in the interviews including mismatching of horse and rider; financial, time, welfare and personal obligations involved in horse ownership; shared-decision making; the horse's quality of life; guilt and responsibility grief surrounding euthanasia decisions.
Conclusion: This study highlighted the strong owner-horse relationship, the significant obligations involved in horse ownership and the emotional impact of euthanasia decisions.
(© 2021 British Veterinary Association.)

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies