Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

N-Acetylcysteine Augmentation for Patients With Major Depressive Disorder and Bipolar Depression.

Tytuł:
N-Acetylcysteine Augmentation for Patients With Major Depressive Disorder and Bipolar Depression.
Autorzy:
Andrade C; Department of Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neurotoxicology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India. .
Źródło:
The Journal of clinical psychiatry [J Clin Psychiatry] 2021 Feb 18; Vol. 82 (1). Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Feb 18.
Typ publikacji:
Journal Article
Język:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Original Publication: Memphis, Tenn., Physicians Postgraduate Press.
MeSH Terms:
Outcome Assessment, Health Care*
Acetylcysteine/*pharmacology
Bipolar Disorder/*drug therapy
Depressive Disorder, Major/*drug therapy
Antidepressive Agents/pharmacology ; Drug Synergism ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Humans ; Meta-Analysis as Topic ; Tranquilizing Agents/pharmacology
Substance Nomenclature:
0 (Antidepressive Agents)
0 (Tranquilizing Agents)
WYQ7N0BPYC (Acetylcysteine)
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20210517 Date Completed: 20210608 Latest Revision: 20210608
Update Code:
20240105
DOI:
10.4088/JCP.21f13891
PMID:
33999540
Czasopismo naukowe
Major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar depression (BD) can often be difficult to treat. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is a nutraceutical product that has been trialed in a large number of neuropsychiatric and medical disorders, with mixed results. Many randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have studied NAC augmentation as an intervention in MDD and BD. These RCTs were pooled in 2 recent meta-analyses. One meta-analysis with 7 RCTs (pooled N = 728) conducted in patients with MDD or BD found that NAC was not superior to placebo in the attenuation of depression ratings in either main or sensitivity analyses. The other meta-analysis with 6 RCTs (pooled N = 248) conducted in patients with BD found a small, imprecise effect size for NAC (standardized mean difference, 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.84). The advantage for NAC in this meta-analysis would almost certainly have been lost had the authors excluded from analysis 2 RCTs, both of which had problematic characteristics and findings and both of which also obtained a large and statistically significant advantage for NAC. At present, therefore, evidence does not encourage the use of NAC as an augmentation treatment for patients with MDD or BD. It remains to be seen whether NAC augmentation benefits depressed subpopulations, such as those with higher levels of inflammatory biomarkers at baseline.
(© Copyright 2021 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.)

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies