Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

Imputing intracluster correlation coefficients from a posterior predictive distribution is a feasible method of dealing with unit of analysis errors in a meta-analysis of cluster RCTs.

Tytuł:
Imputing intracluster correlation coefficients from a posterior predictive distribution is a feasible method of dealing with unit of analysis errors in a meta-analysis of cluster RCTs.
Autorzy:
Konnyu KJ; Center for Evidence Synthesis in Health, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI; Department of Health Services, Policy & Practice, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI. Electronic address: kristin_.
Taljaard M; Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Ivers NM; Family Practice Health Centre, Women's College Research Institute, and Institute for Health Systems Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada; Department of Family and Community Medicine, and Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Moher D; Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Grimshaw JM; Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Źródło:
Journal of clinical epidemiology [J Clin Epidemiol] 2021 Nov; Vol. 139, pp. 307-318. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jun 22.
Typ publikacji:
Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Język:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Publication: New York : Elsevier
Original Publication: Oxford ; New York : Pergamon Press, c1988-
MeSH Terms:
Meta-Analysis as Topic*
Scientific Experimental Error*
Data Collection/*methods
Data Collection/*statistics & numerical data
Diabetes Mellitus/*therapy
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/*statistics & numerical data
Research Design/*statistics & numerical data
Cluster Analysis ; Humans
Grant Information:
FRN-123345 Canada CIHR
Contributed Indexing:
Keywords: Cluster randomized trials; Complex interventions; Intraclass correlation coefficient; Meta-analysis; Unit of analysis errors; intracluster correlation coefficient
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20210625 Date Completed: 20211220 Latest Revision: 20211220
Update Code:
20240105
DOI:
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.06.011
PMID:
34171503
Czasopismo naukowe
Background: Incorporating cluster randomized trials (CRTs) into meta-analyses is challenging because appropriate standard errors of study estimates accounting for clustering are not always reported. Systematic reviews of CRTs often use a single constant external estimate of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) to adjust study estimate standard errors and facilitate meta-analyses; an approach that fails to account for possible variation of ICCs among studies and the imprecision with which they are estimated. Using a large systematic review of the effects of diabetes quality improvement interventions, we investigated whether we could better account for ICC variation and uncertainty in meta-analyzed effect estimates by imputing missing ICCs from a posterior predictive distribution constructed from a database of relevant ICCs.
Methods: We constructed a dataset of ICC estimates from applicable studies. For outcomes with two or more available ICC estimates, we constructed posterior predictive ICC distributions in a Bayesian framework. For a selected continuous outcome, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), we compared the impact of incorporating a single constant ICC versus imputing ICCs drawn from the posterior predictive distribution when estimating the effect of intervention components on post treatment mean in a case study of diabetes quality improvement trials.
Results: Using internal and external ICC estimates, we were able to construct a database of 59 ICCs for 12 of the 13 review outcomes (range 1-10 per outcome) and estimate the posterior predictive ICC distribution for 11 review outcomes. Synthesized results were not markedly changed by our approach for HbA1c.
Conclusion: Building posterior predictive distributions to impute missing ICCs is a feasible approach to facilitate principled meta-analyses of cluster randomized trials using prior data. Further work is needed to establish whether the application of these methods leads to improved review inferences for different reviews based on different factors (e.g., proportion of CRTs and CRTs with missing ICCs, different outcomes, variation and precision of ICCs).
(Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies