Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Przeglądasz jako GOŚĆ
Tytuł pozycji:

Same-day discharge after robotic surgery for endometrial cancer.

Tytuł :
Same-day discharge after robotic surgery for endometrial cancer.
Autorzy :
Zhang N; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.
Wilson B; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, West Cancer Center and Research Institute, 7945 Wolf River Blvd., Memphis, TN, 38138, USA.
Enty MA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.
Ketch P; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.
Ulm MA; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, West Cancer Center and Research Institute, 7945 Wolf River Blvd., Memphis, TN, 38138, USA.
ElNaggar AC; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, West Cancer Center and Research Institute, 7945 Wolf River Blvd., Memphis, TN, 38138, USA.
Daily L; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, West Cancer Center and Research Institute, 7945 Wolf River Blvd., Memphis, TN, 38138, USA.
Tillmanns T; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, West Cancer Center and Research Institute, 7945 Wolf River Blvd., Memphis, TN, 38138, USA. .
Pokaż więcej
Źródło :
Journal of robotic surgery [J Robot Surg] 2021 Jul 08. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jul 08.
Publication Model :
Ahead of Print
Typ publikacji :
Journal Article
Język :
English
Imprint Name(s) :
Original Publication: London : Springer
References :
Wright JD et al (2013) Nationwide trends in the performance of inpatient hysterectomy in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 122(2 Pt 1):233–241. (PMID: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318299a6cf)
Olsson JH, Ellstrom M, Hahlin M (1996) A randomised prospective trial comparing laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 103(4):345–350. (PMID: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09740.x)
Walker JL et al (2009) Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2. J Clin Oncol 27(32):5331–5336. (PMID: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.3248)
Gien LT, Kupets R, Covens A (2011) Feasibility of same-day discharge after laparoscopic surgery in gynecologic oncology. Gynecol Oncol 121(2):339–343. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.12.344)
Lee SJ et al (2014) The feasibility and safety of same-day discharge after robotic-assisted hysterectomy alone or with other procedures for benign and malignant indications. Gynecol Oncol 133(3):552–555. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.04.006)
Perron-Burdick M, Yamamoto M, Zaritsky E (2011) Same-day discharge after laparoscopic hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 117(5):1136–1141. (PMID: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318215dd4e)
Lincoln KD, Abdou CM, Lloyd D (2014) Race and socioeconomic differences in obesity and depression among Black and non-Hispanic White Americans. J Health Care Poor Underserved 25(1):257–275. (PMID: 10.1353/hpu.2014.0038)
(n.d.), G. (2020) Google maps directions to drive from hospital facility to patient home. Available from https://www.google.com/maps.
Whitney C, Spirtos N (2009) Gynecologic oncology group surgical procedures manual. Philadelphia: Gynecologic Oncology Group.
Herling SF et al (2016) Cost-analysis of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer and atypical complex hyperplasia. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 95(3):299–308. (PMID: 10.1111/aogs.12820)
Leitao MM et al (2016) Impact of robotic platforms on surgical approach and costs in the management of morbidly obese patients with newly diagnosed uterine cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 23(7):2192–2198. (PMID: 10.1245/s10434-015-5062-6)
Penner KR et al (2015) Same-day discharge is feasible and safe in patients undergoing minimally invasive staging for gynecologic malignancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 212(2):186 e1–8. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.08.010)
Schiavone MB et al (2012) Feasibility and economic impact of same-day discharge for women who undergo laparoscopic hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 207(5):382 e1–9. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.09.014)
Kim M et al (2013) Assessing patient-reported outcomes and preferences for same-day discharge after percutaneous coronary intervention: results from a pilot randomized, controlled trial. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 6(2):186–192. (PMID: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.000069)
Bruneau L et al (2015) Total laparoscopic hysterectomy and same-day discharge: satisfaction evaluation and feasibility study. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 44(9):870–876. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2015.02.003)
Delaney LJ et al (2018) “They can rest at home”: an observational study of patients’ quality of sleep in an Australian hospital. BMC Health Serv Res 18(1):524. (PMID: 10.1186/s12913-018-3201-z)
Rivard C et al (2015) Factors influencing same-day hospital discharge and risk factors for readmission after robotic surgery in the gynecologic oncology patient population. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 22(2):219–226. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.10.001)
Philp L et al (2017) Feasibility and safety of same-day discharge after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervix cancer. Gynecol Oncol 147(3):572–576. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.09.026)
Lee J et al (2016) The safety of same-day discharge after laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 142(3):508–513. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.06.010)
Bureau, U.S.C. (2019) U.S. Census Bureau Quick Facts. 2019 cited 2021. Available from https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045219.
Long B, Liu FW, Bristow RE (2013) Disparities in uterine cancer epidemiology, treatment, and survival among African Americans in the United States. Gynecol Oncol 130(3):652–659. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.05.020)
Kjerulff KH et al (1993) Hysterectomy and race. Obstet Gynecol 82(5):757–764. (PMID: 8414322)
Nugent EK et al (2011) Wound complications after gynecologic cancer surgery. Gynecol Oncol 121(2):347–352. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.01.026)
Olsen MA et al (2009) Developing a risk stratification model for surgical site infection after abdominal hysterectomy. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 30(11):1077–1083. (PMID: 10.1086/606166)
Liang MI et al (2013) Reducing readmissions after robotic surgical management of endometrial cancer: a potential for improved quality care. Gynecol Oncol 131(3):508–511. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.09.033)
Lowe MP et al (2009) A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 113(2):191–194. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.01.018)
Contributed Indexing :
Keywords: Cancer; Endometrial; Gynecologic oncology; Same-day discharge
Entry Date(s) :
Date Created: 20210708 Latest Revision: 20210708
Update Code :
20210914
DOI :
10.1007/s11701-021-01253-0
PMID :
34236587
Czasopismo naukowe
To assess the safety of same-day discharge (SDD) following robotic-assisted endometrial cancer staging and identify risk factors for postoperative admission in a diverse population. A review of patients who underwent robotic-assisted endometrial cancer staging from April 1, 2017 to April 1, 2019 was performed. Patients were evaluated for SDD if they met the following criteria: tolerating oral intake, voiding spontaneously, ambulating, negative orthostatic vitals, postoperative hemoglobin ≤ 2 g/dL from baseline, pain controlled on oral medications, and desire to be discharged. Risk factors for admission were identified. One hundred eighty-seven patients were identified. SDD criteria were met in 158, of which 132 (83.5%) were discharged same day. Median length of stay was 4.5 h. Reasons for admission despite meeting criteria were late surgery time (n = 15), abnormal vitals (n = 9), and personal concerns (n = 2), with risk factors being age ≥ 68 years (OR 2.72; 95% CI, 1.13-6.59), start time 1400 or later (OR = 11.25; 95% CI, 4.35-29.10), ASA ≥ 4 (OR 23.82; 95% CI, 2.54-223.15), history of CVA/MI (OR 5.61; 95% CI, 1.07-29.52), and operative time ≥ 120 min (OR = 3.83; 95% CI 1.36-10.77). Of the SDD cohort, 2 patients (1.3%) presented to the emergency room within 30 days (postoperative day 5 and 23). SDD following robotic-assisted endometrial cancer staging is safe and feasible. Age ≥ 68 years, surgery start time after 1400, ASA ≥ 4, history of CVA/MI, and operative time ≥ 120 min appear predictive of inpatient admission despite meeting SDD criteria.

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies