Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

Safety and imaging performance of two-channel RF shimming for fetal MRI at 3T.

Tytuł:
Safety and imaging performance of two-channel RF shimming for fetal MRI at 3T.
Autorzy:
Yetisir F; Fetal-Neonatal Neuroimaging & Developmental Science Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abaci Turk E; Fetal-Neonatal Neuroimaging & Developmental Science Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Guerin B; Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA.; Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Gagoski BA; Fetal-Neonatal Neuroimaging & Developmental Science Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.; Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Grant PE; Fetal-Neonatal Neuroimaging & Developmental Science Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.; Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Adalsteinsson E; Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.; Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.; Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Wald LL; Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA.; Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.; Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Źródło:
Magnetic resonance in medicine [Magn Reson Med] 2021 Nov; Vol. 86 (5), pp. 2810-2821. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jul 09.
Typ publikacji:
Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Język:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Publication: 1999- : New York, NY : Wiley
Original Publication: San Diego : Academic Press,
MeSH Terms:
Magnetic Resonance Imaging*
Radio Waves*
Female ; Fetus/diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Pregnancy
References:
Phys Med Biol. 2010 Apr 21;55(8):2411-26. (PMID: 20360633)
Eur J Radiol. 2008 Nov;68(2):214-26. (PMID: 18790583)
Phys Med Biol. 1996 Nov;41(11):2251-69. (PMID: 8938025)
Phys Med Biol. 2008 Dec 21;53(24):7187-95. (PMID: 19033645)
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Oct;42(4):855-69. (PMID: 25854179)
Magn Reson Med. 2016 Sep;76(3):986-97. (PMID: 26400841)
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Jan;206(1):195-201. (PMID: 26700352)
Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2011 Dec;107(3):428-33. (PMID: 21964524)
Magn Reson Med. 2021 Jan;85(1):429-443. (PMID: 32643152)
Magn Reson Med. 2020 Feb;83(2):695-711. (PMID: 31483521)
Biomed Tech (Berl). 2016 Aug 1;61(4):455-61. (PMID: 26985683)
Phys Med Biol. 2014 Sep 21;59(18):5287-303. (PMID: 25144615)
Phys Med Biol. 2011 Apr 7;56(7):N93-8. (PMID: 21364261)
Semin Perinatol. 2013 Oct;37(5):301-4. (PMID: 24176150)
Magn Reson Med. 2003 Jan;49(1):144-50. (PMID: 12509830)
Magn Reson Med. 2005 Feb;53(2):434-45. (PMID: 15678527)
J Perinat Med. 2015 Mar;43(2):209-20. (PMID: 25324440)
Magn Reson Med. 2020 Apr;83(4):1418-1428. (PMID: 31626373)
Magn Reson Med. 2006 Apr;55(4):883-93. (PMID: 16508913)
Magn Reson Med. 2017 May;77(5):2048-2056. (PMID: 27174499)
Phys Med Biol. 2010 Jan 21;55(2):N23-38. (PMID: 20019402)
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997 Feb;168(2):513-9. (PMID: 9016238)
Phys Med Biol. 2010 Feb 21;55(4):913-30. (PMID: 20090188)
Magn Reson Med. 2012 Nov;68(5):1664-74. (PMID: 22231647)
NMR Biomed. 2015 Oct;28(10):1332-44. (PMID: 26332290)
Phys Med Biol. 2008 Nov 7;53(21):L15-8. (PMID: 18843171)
Magn Reson Med. 2004 Apr;51(4):775-84. (PMID: 15065251)
Magn Reson Med. 2015 Mar;73(3):1137-50. (PMID: 24752979)
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2007 Aug;15(3):277-90, v. (PMID: 17893049)
Grant Information:
R01 HD100009 United States HD NICHD NIH HHS; P50 HD105351 United States HD NICHD NIH HHS; R01 EB017337 United States EB NIBIB NIH HHS; R01 EB006847 United States EB NIBIB NIH HHS; U01 HD087211 United States HD NICHD NIH HHS
Contributed Indexing:
Keywords: fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); parallel transmission (pTx); pregnant body models; radiofrequency (RF) shimming; radiofrequency safety
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20210709 Date Completed: 20211026 Latest Revision: 20221102
Update Code:
20240105
PubMed Central ID:
PMC8530882
DOI:
10.1002/mrm.28895
PMID:
34240759
Czasopismo naukowe
Purpose: This study investigates whether two-channel radiofrequency (RF) shimming can improve imaging without increasing specific absorption rate (SAR) for fetal MRI at 3T.
Methods: Transmit field ( B 1 + ) average and variation in the fetus was simulated in seven numerical pregnant body models. Safety was quantified by maternal and fetal peak local SAR and fetal average SAR. The shim parameter space was divided into improved B 1 + (magnitude and homogeneity) and improved SAR regions, and an overlap where RF shimming improved both classes of metrics compared with birdcage mode was assessed. Additionally, the effect of fetal position, tissue detail, and dielectric properties on transmit field and SAR was studied.
Results: A region of subject-specific RF shim parameter space improving both B 1 + and SAR metrics was found for five of the seven models. Optimizing only B 1 + metrics improved B 1 + efficiency across models by 15% on average and 28% for the best-case model. B 1 + variation improved by 26% on average and 49% for the best case. However, for these shim settings, fetal SAR increased by up to 106%. The overlap region, where both B 1 + and SAR metrics improve, showed an average B 1 + efficiency improvement of 6% on average across models and 19% for the best-case model. B 1 + variation improved by 13% on average and 40% for the best case. RFS could also decrease maternal/fetal SAR by up to 49%/58%.
Conclusion: RF shimming can improve imaging compared with birdcage mode without increasing fetal and maternal SAR when a patient-specific SAR model is incorporated into the shimming procedure.
(© 2021 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.)

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies