Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

Surgeon satisfaction and outcomes of tele-proctoring for robotic gynecologic surgery.

Tytuł:
Surgeon satisfaction and outcomes of tele-proctoring for robotic gynecologic surgery.
Autorzy:
Artsen AM; Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Magee-Womens Research Institute, 204 Craft Ave, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA. .
S Burkett L; Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Magee-Womens Research Institute, 204 Craft Ave, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Duvvuri U; Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Eye and Ear Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Bonidie M; Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Magee-Womens Research Institute, 204 Craft Ave, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Źródło:
Journal of robotic surgery [J Robot Surg] 2021 Jul 16. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jul 16.
Publication Model:
Ahead of Print
Typ publikacji:
Journal Article
Język:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Original Publication: London : Springer
References:
Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;128(3):e85-e88. (PMID: 27548559)
Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Feb;123(2 Pt 1):349-352. (PMID: 24402592)
Surg Today. 2013 Feb;43(2):115-22. (PMID: 22836545)
J Urol. 2018 Feb;199(2):355-369. (PMID: 28655529)
J Urol. 2009 Sep;182(3):1126-32. (PMID: 19625032)
Surg Endosc. 2006 Sep;20(9):1389-93. (PMID: 16823656)
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 7;10(12):e039457. (PMID: 33293306)
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Mar;125(3):760-767. (PMID: 25730256)
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Dec 05;6(12):e1999. (PMID: 30656104)
J Urol. 2012 Jan;187(1):247-52. (PMID: 22099993)
Ann Surg. 2013 Dec;258(6):1130-6. (PMID: 23989055)
Surgery. 2014 Sep;156(3):718-22. (PMID: 25175506)
Surg Innov. 2017 Aug;24(4):379-385. (PMID: 28494684)
J Surg Educ. 2015 Nov-Dec;72(6):1290-5. (PMID: 26276303)
Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;114(5):1156-1158. (PMID: 20168127)
Telemed J E Health. 2009 Jun;15(5):445-53. (PMID: 19548825)
Ann Transl Med. 2016 Oct;4(20):391. (PMID: 27867943)
Surg Technol Int. 2004;12:68-72. (PMID: 15455311)
Neurosurgery. 2005 Mar;56(3):434-40; discussion 434-40. (PMID: 15730568)
World J Surg. 2001 Nov;25(11):1438-48. (PMID: 11760748)
Grant Information:
K12 HD043441 United States HD NICHD NIH HHS; K12HD043441 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Contributed Indexing:
Keywords: Robotic surgery; Surgical innovation; Tele-mentoring; Tele-proctoring
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20210717 Latest Revision: 20210721
Update Code:
20220302
PubMed Central ID:
PMC8284683
DOI:
10.1007/s11701-021-01280-x
PMID:
34272656
Czasopismo naukowe
Surgical proctoring requires increasing resources in growing healthcare systems. In addition, travel has become less safe in the era of COVID-19. This study demonstrates surgeon satisfaction and safety with tele-proctoring in robotic gynecologic surgery. This pilot study assesses surgeon satisfaction and operative outcomes with a novel operative tele-proctoring system with a continuous two-way video-audio feed that allows the off-site surgeon to see the operating room, surgical field, and hands of the robotic surgeon. After thorough system testing, two experienced surgeons underwent tele-proctoring for hospital credentialing, completing 7 total cases. Each completed pre- and post-surveys developed from the Michigan Standard Simulation Experience Scale. Surgical characteristics were compared between tele-proctored cases and 59 historical cases proctored in-person over the last 8 years. Surgeons reported unanimous high satisfaction with tele-proctoring (5 ± 0). There were no major technologic issues. Five of the tele-proctored cases and 35 of controls were hysterectomies. Mean age was 48.2 ± 1.4 years, mean BMI was 29.6 ± 0.9 kg/m 2 , and mean uterine weight was 152 ± 112.3 g. Two-thirds had prior abdominal surgery (P > 0.1). Tele-proctored hysterectomies were 58 ± 6.5 min shorter than controls (P = 0.001). There were no differences in EBL or complication rates (P > 0.1). Tele-proctoring resulted in high surgeon satisfaction rates with no difference in EBL or complications. Tele-mentoring is a natural extension of tele-proctoring that could provide advanced surgical expertise far beyond where we can physically reach.
(© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies

Prześlij opinię

Twoje opinie są dla nas bardzo ważne i mogą być niezwykle pomocne w pokazaniu nam, gdzie możemy dokonać ulepszeń. Bylibyśmy bardzo wdzięczni za poświęcenie kilku chwil na wypełnienie krótkiego formularza.

Formularz