Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

Characteristics of lymph node (No.5 and No.6) metastasis and significance of lymph node dissection in Siewert type II esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma (AEG): No.5 and No.6 lymph node metastases of AEG and clearance.

Tytuł:
Characteristics of lymph node (No.5 and No.6) metastasis and significance of lymph node dissection in Siewert type II esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma (AEG): No.5 and No.6 lymph node metastases of AEG and clearance.
Autorzy:
Zhang X; General Department 2, Second Hospital, Lanzhou University, 82 Cuiyingmen Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
He XD; General Department 2, Second Hospital, Lanzhou University, 82 Cuiyingmen Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Zhang YC; General Department 2, Second Hospital, Lanzhou University, 82 Cuiyingmen Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Yang KH; Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.; Key Laboratory of Evidence-Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Tian JH; Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.; Key Laboratory of Evidence-Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Chen YL; Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.; Key Laboratory of Evidence-Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Źródło:
Medicine [Medicine (Baltimore)] 2021 Sep 03; Vol. 100 (35), pp. e27106.
Typ publikacji:
Journal Article
Język:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Original Publication: Hagerstown, Md : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
MeSH Terms:
Adenocarcinoma/*complications
Esophagogastric Junction/*abnormalities
Lymph Node Excision/*statistics & numerical data
Lymphatic Metastasis/*physiopathology
Adenocarcinoma/diagnostic imaging ; Aged ; Esophagogastric Junction/diagnostic imaging ; Female ; Humans ; Lymph Node Excision/methods ; Lymphatic Metastasis/diagnostic imaging ; Lymphatic Metastasis/therapy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies
References:
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Oct;41(10):1348-53. (PMID: 26087995)
J Gastric Cancer. 2015 Sep;15(3):191-200. (PMID: 26468417)
Gut. 2015 Dec;64(12):1881-8. (PMID: 25748648)
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Feb 25;22(2):149-155. (PMID: 30799537)
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Aug 20;100(16):1184-7. (PMID: 18695138)
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Aug;94(34):e1386. (PMID: 26313779)
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Feb 25;22(2):132-142. (PMID: 30799535)
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Feb;23(2):256-263. (PMID: 30334176)
Br J Surg. 1998 Nov;85(11):1457-9. (PMID: 9823902)
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2014 Dec;38(6):751-6. (PMID: 24994519)
Gastric Cancer. 2014 Mar 22;:. (PMID: 24658651)
Dig Endosc. 2017 Apr;29 Suppl 2:18-25. (PMID: 28425657)
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20210903 Date Completed: 20210913 Latest Revision: 20240403
Update Code:
20240403
PubMed Central ID:
PMC8416002
DOI:
10.1097/MD.0000000000027106
PMID:
34477150
Czasopismo naukowe
Background: To analyze the characteristics, related risk factors, and prognosis of lymph node metastasis (Number [No.] 5 and No.6) in the group of adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (AEG).
Methods: The patients with Siewert II AEG who underwent total gastrectomy and D2 lymph node dissection from September 2015 to December 2018 in Lanzhou University Second Hospital were enrolled in this study. The pathological features of the postoperative specimens were analyzed (sex, age, maximum diameter, location, depth of invasion, degree of differentiation, neurological and vascular invasion, etc), and the lymph node metastasis rate of No.5, No.6 groups were calculated. The analysis was performed by IBM SPSS statistical software. The risk factors associated with lymph node metastasis in No.5 and No.6 groups were analyzed. Survival analysis was performed by Kaplan-M method, and survival rate was estimated, Log-rank test was used for comparison, and the difference was statistically significant at P < .05.
Results: There were 142 cases of Siewert type II AEG with the positive rate of No.5 lymph nodes being 10.81% (8/74), and the positive rate of No.6 lymph nodes was 8.33% (11/132). No.5 and No.6 lymph nodes metastasis were not associated with gender, age, tumor maximum diameter, location (cardiac left/cardiac right) (P > .05), and were associated with invasion depth, differentiation degree, nerve and vascular invasion (P < .05). In the No.5 lymph node-positive group, the 3-year Overall Survival (OS) was 25.0%, and the No.5 lymph node-negative group had a 5-year OS of 57.8%, which was statistically different (P < .05). The 3-year OS was 18.2% in No.6 node-positive group and 53.8% in No.6 node-negative group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < .05).
Conclusion: For Siewert type II AEG, the lymph node metastasis rate was higher in No.5 and No.6 groups when the tumor invaded all layers of gastric wall and was poorly differentiated complicated with vascular nerve invasion, and the lymph node metastasis rate was lower at 3 years, which may be more appropriate for total gastrectomy +D2 lymph node dissection.
Competing Interests: The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose.
(Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies