Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

Attitude changes toward prenatal testing among women with twin pregnancies after the introduction of noninvasive prenatal testing: A single-center study in Japan.

Tytuł:
Attitude changes toward prenatal testing among women with twin pregnancies after the introduction of noninvasive prenatal testing: A single-center study in Japan.
Autorzy:
Ogawa M; Clinical Research Institute, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan.; Department of Clinical Genetics and Medicine, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Hasuo Y; Clinical Research Institute, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan.; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan.; Genetic Counseling Clinic, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Taura Y; Clinical Research Institute, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan.; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan.; Genetic Counseling Clinic, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Tsunematsu R; Department of Gynecology, National Hospital Organization Kagoshima Medical Center, Kagoshima, Japan.
Shikada S; Department of Clinical Genetics and Medicine, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Matsushita Y; Clinical Research Institute, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan.; Genetic Counseling Clinic, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan.; Department of Pediatrics, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Sato K; Clinical Research Institute, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan.; Department of Pediatrics, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Źródło:
The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research [J Obstet Gynaecol Res] 2021 Nov; Vol. 47 (11), pp. 3813-3820. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Sep 06.
Typ publikacji:
Journal Article
Język:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Publication: [Melbourne, Vic. : Wiley on behalf of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology]
Original Publication: Tokyo : University of Tokyo Press, c1996-
MeSH Terms:
Genetic Counseling*
Pregnancy, Twin*
Aneuploidy ; Attitude ; Chorion ; Female ; Genetic Testing ; Humans ; Japan ; Pregnancy ; Prenatal Diagnosis
References:
J Genet Couns. 2006 Apr;15(2):119-27. (PMID: 16642275)
J Hum Genet. 2015 Mar;60(3):133-7. (PMID: 25566756)
Hum Reprod. 2008 Jul;23(7):1545-52. (PMID: 18385126)
Fetal Diagn Ther. 1996 Jan-Feb;11(1):16-9. (PMID: 8719716)
J Genet Couns. 2018 Sep;27(5):1238-1247. (PMID: 29525932)
Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Nov;128(5):1127-1133. (PMID: 27741202)
Prenat Diagn. 2016 Jul;36(7):672-9. (PMID: 27150972)
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 8;14(8):e0220979. (PMID: 31393959)
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Apr;12(2):87-92. (PMID: 10813569)
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Feb;214(2):172-191. (PMID: 26548710)
Lancet. 1995 Mar 18;345(8951):704-9. (PMID: 7885127)
Prenat Diagn. 2015 Apr;35(4):331-6. (PMID: 25408438)
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2018 Oct;44(10):1909-1914. (PMID: 30015363)
Acta Med Okayama. 2015;69(3):155-63. (PMID: 26101191)
Prenat Diagn. 2005 Sep;25(9):746-50. (PMID: 16170837)
Prenat Diagn. 2011 Oct;31(10):1007-9. (PMID: 21732393)
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Apr;49(4):470-477. (PMID: 27194226)
BJOG. 2014 Jun;121(7):809-19; discussion 820. (PMID: 24495335)
Semin Perinatol. 2002 Aug;26(4):239-49. (PMID: 12211614)
Mol Cytogenet. 2020 Feb 05;13:5. (PMID: 32042312)
J Med Ultrason (2001). 2015 Apr;42(2):195-8. (PMID: 26576572)
J Hum Genet. 2016 Dec;61(12):995-1001. (PMID: 27604555)
Genet Med. 2016 Oct;18(10):1056-65. (PMID: 27467454)
J Hum Genet. 2016 Oct;61(10):879-884. (PMID: 27357425)
Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Aug;98(2):231-4. (PMID: 11506838)
Clin Perinatol. 2005 Jun;32(2):373-86, vi. (PMID: 15922788)
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2013 May;39(5):942-7. (PMID: 23509876)
Semin Perinatol. 1995 Oct;19(5):351-62. (PMID: 8821023)
Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Feb;89(2):248-51. (PMID: 9015029)
Semin Perinatol. 2005 Oct;29(5):312-20. (PMID: 16360490)
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Sep;52(3):318-324. (PMID: 28833712)
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2017 Aug;43(8):1245-1255. (PMID: 28586143)
Contributed Indexing:
Keywords: 2.213 genetic counseling; 2.313 serum screening for aneuploidy and anomalies; 2.317 genetic amniocentesis; 2.512 multiple gestation; 4.125 assisted reproductive technology; clinical
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20210907 Date Completed: 20211103 Latest Revision: 20220731
Update Code:
20240105
PubMed Central ID:
PMC9292293
DOI:
10.1111/jog.15010
PMID:
34490692
Czasopismo naukowe
Aim: This study aimed to evaluate changes in prenatal testing among women with twin pregnancies before and after the introduction of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT). To date, no consensus on prenatal testing for twin pregnancies has been reached in Japan.
Methods: Women pregnant with twins who requested prenatal testing at Kyushu Medical Center from 2005 to 2018 were included in this study. Genetic counseling was provided to all participants. Their chosen methods of testing were collected and classified as invasive diagnosis (ID), noninvasive screening (NIS), and no test requested (NR). Parity, chorionicity, and methods of conception were assessed as attributes. The study period was divided into three terms according to testing availability in our center.
Results: After NIPT was introduced in our center, the use of ID methods decreased and eventually disappeared while NIS came to the forefront. NR was also the preferred choice of women with twin pregnancies before the introduction of NIPT and decreased but did not disappear after introducing NIPT. Women with twin pregnancies who underwent assisted reproduction initially showed hesitation to undergo testing but showed a strong preference for NIS after the introduction of NIPT. Differences in choice according to parity, chorionicity, and methods of conception were found before the introduction of NIPT but disappeared after introducing NIPT.
Conclusion: Increasing information about NIPT has apparently influenced the attitudes of women with twin pregnancies to prenatal testing in Japan. In particular, those who conceive through assisted reproductive technologies exhibited a strong preference for NIPT.
(© 2021 The Authors. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.)

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies