Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

Both intraoperative medial and lateral soft tissue balances influence intraoperative rotational knee kinematics in bi-cruciate stabilized total knee arthroplasty: A retrospective investigation.

Tytuł:
Both intraoperative medial and lateral soft tissue balances influence intraoperative rotational knee kinematics in bi-cruciate stabilized total knee arthroplasty: A retrospective investigation.
Autorzy:
Takagi K; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.
Inui H; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan. hiroshi_.
Taketomi S; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.
Yamagami R; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.
Kono K; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.
Kawaguchi K; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.
Sameshima S; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.
Kage T; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.
Tanaka S; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.
Źródło:
BMC musculoskeletal disorders [BMC Musculoskelet Disord] 2021 Sep 27; Vol. 22 (1), pp. 830. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Sep 27.
Typ publikacji:
Journal Article
Język:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Original Publication: London : BioMed Central, [2000-
MeSH Terms:
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee*
Osteoarthritis, Knee*/diagnostic imaging
Osteoarthritis, Knee*/surgery
Biomechanical Phenomena ; Humans ; Knee Joint/diagnostic imaging ; Knee Joint/surgery ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Retrospective Studies
References:
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Jul;27(7):2096-2103. (PMID: 30972466)
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Feb;31(2):401-5. (PMID: 26518359)
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Apr;29(4):702-6. (PMID: 23958237)
J Orthop Sci. 2006 May;11(3):264-6. (PMID: 16721527)
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004 Nov;86(8):1133-6. (PMID: 15568525)
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Nov;(416):37-57. (PMID: 14646738)
Knee. 2020 Aug;27(4):1263-1270. (PMID: 32711890)
J Orthop. 2017 Jan 07;14(1):201-206. (PMID: 28123262)
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013 Mar;48(3):452-8. (PMID: 23208313)
J Knee Surg. 2018 May;31(5):448-452. (PMID: 28719942)
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. (PMID: 17695343)
J Biomech. 2005 Feb;38(2):197-208. (PMID: 15598446)
J Orthop Res. 2009 Dec;27(12):1555-61. (PMID: 19504589)
Knee. 2017 Dec;24(6):1478-1484. (PMID: 28970125)
J Knee Surg. 2019 Jan;32(1):91-96. (PMID: 29514366)
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Mar;33(3):729-734. (PMID: 29103777)
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2019 Aug;68:16-22. (PMID: 31141758)
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Mar;22(3):615-20. (PMID: 23948722)
J Arthroplasty. 2013 May;28(5):766-71. (PMID: 23499408)
J Arthroplasty. 2015 Jul;30(7):1237-42. (PMID: 25680453)
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 Feb;136(2):271-6. (PMID: 26739138)
Knee. 2018 Dec;25(6):1247-1253. (PMID: 30414789)
J Arthroplasty. 2001 Sep;16(6):740-7. (PMID: 11547372)
J Arthroplasty. 2007 Feb;22(2):235-40. (PMID: 17275640)
Bone Joint J. 2013 Apr;95-B(4):472-7. (PMID: 23539698)
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2013 May 02;5:10. (PMID: 23638774)
J Arthroplasty. 2015 Sep;30(9):1537-41. (PMID: 25896547)
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Sep;19(9):1418-32. (PMID: 21833512)
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995 Dec;(321):28-31. (PMID: 7497681)
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jan;32(1):270-273. (PMID: 27460300)
Contributed Indexing:
Keywords: Bi-cruciate stabilized; Lateral soft tissue balance; Medial soft tissue balance; Tibial internal rotation; Total knee arthroplasty
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20210928 Date Completed: 20210929 Latest Revision: 20211001
Update Code:
20240105
PubMed Central ID:
PMC8477560
DOI:
10.1186/s12891-021-04709-4
PMID:
34579677
Czasopismo naukowe
Background: Tibial internal rotation following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is important in achieving favorable postoperative clinical outcomes. Studies have reported the effect of intraoperative soft tissue balance on tibial internal rotation in conventional TKA, no studies have evaluated the effects of soft tissue balance at medial or lateral compartments separately on tibial internal rotation in bi-cruciate stabilized (BCS) TKA. The purpose of this study was to clarify the relationship between medial or lateral component gaps and rotational knee kinematics in BCS TKA.
Methods: One hundred fifty-eight knees that underwent BCS TKA were included in this study. The intraoperative medial and lateral joint laxities which was defined as the value of component gap minus the thickness of the tibial component were firstly divided into two groups, respectively: Group M-stable (medial joint laxity, ≤ 2 mm) or Group M-loose (medial joint laxity, ≥ 3 mm) and Group L-stable (lateral joint laxity, ≤ 3 mm) or Group L-loose (lateral joint laxity, ≥ 4 mm). And finally, the knees enrolled in this study were divided into four groups based on the combination of Group M and Group L: Group A (M-stable and L-stable), Group B (M-stable and L-loose), Group C (M-loose and L-stable), and Group D (M-loose and L-loose). The intraoperative rotational knee kinematics were compared between the four Groups at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° flexion, respectively.
Results: The rotational angular difference between 0° flexion and maximum flexion in Group B at 30° flexion was significantly larger than that in Group A at 30° flexion (*p < 0.05). The rotational angular difference between 30° flexion and maximum flexion in Group B at 30° flexion was significantly larger than that in Group D at 30° flexion (*p < 0.05). The rotational angular differences between 30° or 90° flexion and maximum flexion in Group B at 60° flexion were significantly larger than those in Group A at 60° flexion (*p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Surgeons should pay attention to the importance of medial joint stability at midflexion and lateral joint laxities at midflexion and 90° flexion on a good tibial internal rotation in BCS TKA.
(© 2021. The Author(s).)
Zaloguj się, aby uzyskać dostęp do pełnego tekstu.

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies