Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

The impact of a computerized physician order entry system implementation on 20 different criteria of medication documentation-a before-and-after study.

Tytuł:
The impact of a computerized physician order entry system implementation on 20 different criteria of medication documentation-a before-and-after study.
Autorzy:
Jungreithmayr V; Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.; Cooperation Unit Clinical Pharmacy, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Meid AD; Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Haefeli WE; Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.; Cooperation Unit Clinical Pharmacy, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Seidling HM; Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. .; Cooperation Unit Clinical Pharmacy, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. .
Corporate Authors:
Implementation Team
Źródło:
BMC medical informatics and decision making [BMC Med Inform Decis Mak] 2021 Oct 11; Vol. 21 (1), pp. 279. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Oct 11.
Typ publikacji:
Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Język:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Original Publication: London : BioMed Central, [2001-
MeSH Terms:
Medical Order Entry Systems*
Documentation ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Medication Errors/prevention & control ; Retrospective Studies
References:
Psychol Methods. 2006 Mar;11(1):54-71. (PMID: 16594767)
Arch Dis Child. 2016 Sep;101(9):e2. (PMID: 27540199)
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Oct;73(10):1279-1286. (PMID: 28643030)
JAMA. 1995 Jul 5;274(1):29-34. (PMID: 7791255)
JAMA. 2005 Mar 9;293(10):1197-203. (PMID: 15755942)
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Nov-Dec;20(6):1159-67. (PMID: 23721982)
Health Serv Res. 2017 Oct;52(5):1928-1957. (PMID: 27714800)
J Crit Care. 2014 Apr;29(2):188-93. (PMID: 24287174)
Int J Clin Pharm. 2019 Feb;41(1):228-236. (PMID: 30446896)
Am J Epidemiol. 1998 Apr 1;147(7):694-703. (PMID: 9554609)
JAMA. 1998 Oct 21;280(15):1311-6. (PMID: 9794308)
Crit Care. 2005 Oct 5;9(5):R516-21. (PMID: 16277713)
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 24;10(7):e0134101. (PMID: 26207363)
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Mar;111:112-122. (PMID: 29425622)
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Mar 1;24(2):432-440. (PMID: 27582471)
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1999 Jul-Aug;6(4):313-21. (PMID: 10428004)
Crit Care. 2006 Feb;10(1):R21. (PMID: 16469126)
Int J Public Health. 2017 Jan;62(1):163-167. (PMID: 27796415)
Drug Saf. 2020 Jun;43(6):517-537. (PMID: 32125666)
Int J Clin Pharm. 2013 Aug;35(4):577-83. (PMID: 23575623)
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Aug 15;167(4):268-274. (PMID: 28693043)
Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Oct;15(10):908-15. (PMID: 18785946)
Intern Med J. 2012 Mar;42(3):e19-22. (PMID: 22432997)
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Jul 20;8(7):e15653. (PMID: 32706721)
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Jul-Aug;16(4):539-49. (PMID: 19390113)
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Mar 1;24(2):413-422. (PMID: 28395016)
Contributed Indexing:
Investigator: J Bittmann; M Fabian; U Klein; S Kugler; M Löpprich; O Reinhard; L Scholz; B Zeeh; W Bitz; T Bugaj; L Kihm; S Kopf; A Liemann; P Wagenlechner; J Zemva; C Benkert; C Merle; S Roman; S Welte
Keywords: Computerized physician order entry system; Documentation errors; Evaluation results; Medication prescription
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20211012 Date Completed: 20211101 Latest Revision: 20211101
Update Code:
20240104
PubMed Central ID:
PMC8504043
DOI:
10.1186/s12911-021-01607-6
PMID:
34635100
Czasopismo naukowe
Background: The medication process is complex and error-prone. To avoid medication errors, a medication order should fulfil certain criteria, such as good readability and comprehensiveness. In this context, a computerized physician order entry (CPOE) system can be helpful. This study aims to investigate the distinct effects on the quality of prescription documentation of a CPOE system implemented on general wards in a large tertiary care hospital.
Methods: In a retrospective analysis, the prescriptions of two groups of 160 patients each were evaluated, with data collected before and after the introduction of a CPOE system. According to nationally available recommendations on prescription documentation, it was assessed whether each prescription fulfilled the established 20 criteria for a safe, complete, and actionable prescription. The resulting fulfilment scores (prescription-Fscores) were compared between the pre-implementation and the post-implementation group and a multivariable analysis was performed to identify the effects of further covariates, i.e., the prescription category, the ward, and the number of concurrently prescribed drugs. Additionally, the fulfilment of the 20 criteria was assessed at an individual criterion-level (denoted criteria-Fscores).
Results: The overall mean prescription-Fscore increased from 57.4% ± 12.0% (n = 1850 prescriptions) before to 89.8% ± 7.2% (n = 1592 prescriptions) after the implementation (p < 0.001). At the level of individual criteria, criteria-Fscores significantly improved in most criteria (n = 14), with 6 criteria reaching a total score of 100% after CPOE implementation. Four criteria showed no statistically significant difference and in two criteria, criteria-Fscores deteriorated significantly. A multivariable analysis confirmed the large impact of the CPOE implementation on prescription-Fscores which was consistent when adjusting for the confounding potential of further covariates.
Conclusions: While the quality of prescription documentation generally increases with implementation of a CPOE system, certain criteria are difficult to fulfil even with the help of a CPOE system. This highlights the need to accompany a CPOE implementation with a thorough evaluation that can provide important information on possible improvements of the software, training needs of prescribers, or the necessity of modifying the underlying clinical processes.
(© 2021. The Author(s).)
Zaloguj się, aby uzyskać dostęp do pełnego tekstu.

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies