Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

Comparison of Autologous Breast Reconstruction Complications by Type of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Regimen.

Tytuł:
Comparison of Autologous Breast Reconstruction Complications by Type of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Regimen.
Autorzy:
Olawoyin OM; From the Yale University School of Medicine.
Mehta S; From the Yale University School of Medicine.
Chouairi F; From the Yale University School of Medicine.
Gabrick KS; From the Yale University School of Medicine.
Avraham T; From the Yale University School of Medicine.
Pusztai L; From the Yale University School of Medicine.
Alperovich M; From the Yale University School of Medicine.
Źródło:
Plastic and reconstructive surgery [Plast Reconstr Surg] 2021 Dec 01; Vol. 148 (6), pp. 1186-1196.
Typ publikacji:
Comparative Study; Journal Article
Język:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Publication: : Hagerstown, MD : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Original Publication: Baltimore : Williams & Wilkins,
MeSH Terms:
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/*adverse effects
Breast Neoplasms/*therapy
Mammaplasty/*adverse effects
Neoadjuvant Therapy/*adverse effects
Postoperative Complications/*epidemiology
Adult ; Anthracyclines/administration & dosage ; Anthracyclines/adverse effects ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage ; Bridged-Ring Compounds/administration & dosage ; Bridged-Ring Compounds/adverse effects ; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/adverse effects ; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/methods ; Female ; Humans ; Mammaplasty/methods ; Mastectomy/adverse effects ; Middle Aged ; Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods ; Postoperative Complications/etiology ; Surgical Flaps/adverse effects ; Surgical Flaps/transplantation ; Taxoids/administration & dosage ; Taxoids/adverse effects ; Treatment Outcome
References:
Harcourt DM, Rumsey NJ, Ambler NR, et al. The psychological effect of mastectomy with or without breast reconstruction: A prospective, multicenter study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111:1060–1068.
Atisha D, Alderman AK, Lowery JC, Kuhn LE, Davis J, Wilkins EG. Prospective analysis of long-term psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: Two-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Study. Ann Surg. 2008;247:1019–1028.
Tarantino I, Banic A, Fischer T. Evaluation of late results in breast reconstruction by latissimus dorsi flap and prosthesis implantation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:1387–1394.
van Nes JG, Putter H, Julien JP, et alCooperating Investigators of the EORTC. Preoperative chemotherapy is safe in early breast cancer, even after 10 years of follow-up; clinical and translational results from the EORTC trial 10902. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;115:101–113.
Schaverien MV, Munnoch DA. Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on outcomes of immediate free autologous breast reconstruction. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013;39:430–436.
Waljee JF, Newman LA. Neoadjuvant systemic therapy and the surgical management of breast cancer. Surg Clin North Am. 2007;87:399–415, ix.
Rastogi P, Anderson SJ, Bear HD, et al. Preoperative chemotherapy: Updates of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocols B-18 and B-27. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:778–785.
Schwartz GF, Hortobagyi GN, Masood S, Palazzo J, Holland R, Page D; Consensus Conference Committee. Proceedings of the Consensus Conference on Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Carcinoma of the Breast, April 26–28, 2003, Philadelphia, PA. Hum Pathol. 2004;35:781–784.
Kaufmann M, Hortobagyi GN, Goldhirsch A, et al. Recommendations from an international expert panel on the use of neoadjuvant (primary) systemic treatment of operable breast cancer: An update. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:1940–1949.
Pathak M, Dwivedi SN, Deo SVS, Thakur B, Sreenivas V, Rath GK. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens in treatment of breast cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol. Syst Rev. 2018;7:89.
Gouy S, Rouzier R, Missana MC, Atallah D, Youssef O, Barreau-Pouhaer L. Immediate reconstruction after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Effect on adjuvant treatment starting and survival. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005;12:161–166.
Mehrara BJ, Santoro TD, Arcilla E, Watson JP, Shaw WW, Da Lio AL. Complications after microvascular breast reconstruction: Experience with 1195 flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:1100–1109.
Deutsch MF, Smith M, Wang B, Ainsle N, Schusterman MA. Immediate breast reconstruction with the TRAM flap after neoadjuvant therapy. Ann Plast Surg. 1999;42:240–244.
Azzawi K, Ismail A, Earl H, Forouhi P, Malata CM. Influence of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on outcomes of immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:1–11.
Warren Peled A, Itakura K, Foster RD, et al. Impact of chemotherapy on postoperative complications after mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. Arch Surg. 2010;145:880–885.
Hu YY, Weeks CM, In H, et al. Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on breast reconstruction. Cancer 2011;117:2833–2841.
Abt NB, Flores JM, Baltodano PA, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and short-term morbidity in patients undergoing mastectomy with and without breast reconstruction. JAMA Surg. 2014;149:1068–1076.
Mortenson MM, Schneider PD, Khatri VP, et al. Immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy increases wound complications: However, initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy is not delayed. Arch Surg. 2004;139:988–991.
Riba J, de Romani SE, Masia J. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer treatment and the evidence-based interaction with immediate autologous and implant-based breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg. 2018;45:25–31.
Wilgus TA. Immune cells in the healing skin wound: Influential players at each stage of repair. Pharmacol Res. 2008;58:112–116.
D’Souza N, Darmanin G, Fedorowicz Z. Immediate versus delayed reconstruction following surgery for breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;7:CD008674.
Ikeda T, Jinno H, Kitajima M. The evolution of primary chemotherapy in breast cancer treatment. Breast Cancer 2004;11:148–155.
von Minckwitz G. Docetaxel/anthracycline combinations for breast cancer treatment. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2007;8:485–495.
Nakatsukasa K, Koyama H, Oouchi Y, et al. Docetaxel and cyclophosphamide as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-negative primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer 2017;24:63–68.
Peto R, Davies C, Godwin J, et al. Comparisons between different polychemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer: Meta-analyses of long-term outcome among 100,000 women in 123 randomised trials. Lancet 2012;379:432–444.
A’Hern RP, Smith IE, Ebbs SR. Chemotherapy and survival in advanced breast cancer: The inclusion of doxorubicin in Cooper type regimens. Br J Cancer 1993;67:801–805.
Fossati R, Confalonieri C, Torri V, et al. Cytotoxic and hormonal treatment for metastatic breast cancer: A systematic review of published randomized trials involving 31,510 women. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:3439–3460.
Chen X, Ye G, Zhang C, et al. Superior outcome after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, anthracycline, and cyclophosphamide versus docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide: Results from the NATT trial in triple negative or HER2 positive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;142:549–558.
Earl HM, Vallier AL, Hiller L, et alNeo-tAnGo Investigators. Effects of the addition of gemcitabine, and paclitaxel-first sequencing, in neoadjuvant sequential epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, and paclitaxel for women with high-risk early breast cancer (Neo-tAnGo): An open-label, 2×2 factorial randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:201–212.
Li L, Chen Y, Chen J, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy increases the prevalence of fat necrosis in immediate free abdominal flap breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014;67:461–467.
Yeung TK, Germond C, Chen X, Wang Z. The mode of action of Taxol: Apoptosis at low concentration and necrosis at high concentration. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999;263:398–404.
Danesi R, Conte PF, Del Tacca M. Pharmacokinetic optimisation of treatment schedules for anthracyclines and paclitaxel in patients with cancer. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1999;37:195–211.
Taghian AG, Abi-Raad R, Assaad SI, et al. Paclitaxel decreases the interstitial fluid pressure and improves oxygenation in breast cancers in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Clinical implications. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:1951–1961.
Shi P, Wang MM, Jiang LY, Liu HT, Sun JZ. Paclitaxel-doxorubicin sequence is more effective in breast cancer cells with heat shock protein 27 overexpression. Chin Med J (Engl.) 2008;121:1975–1979.
Mirzabeigi MN, Smartt JM, Nelson JA, Fosnot J, Serletti JM, Wu LC. An assessment of the risks and benefits of immediate autologous breast reconstruction in patients undergoing postmastectomy radiation therapy. Ann Plast Surg. 2013;71:149–155.
Garvey PB, Clemens MW, Hoy AE, et al. Muscle-sparing TRAM flap does not protect breast reconstruction from postmastectomy radiation damage compared with the DIEP flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133:223–233.
Clarke-Pearson EM, Chadha M, Dayan E, et al. Comparison of irradiated versus nonirradiated DIEP flaps in patients undergoing immediate bilateral DIEP reconstruction with unilateral postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT). Ann Plast Surg. 2013;71:250–254.
Chang EI, Liu TS, Festekjian JH, Da Lio AL, Crisera CA. Effects of radiation therapy for breast cancer based on type of free flap reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:1e–8e.
Crisera CA, Chang EI, Da Lio AL, Festekjian JH, Mehrara BJ. Immediate free flap reconstruction for advanced-stage breast cancer: Is it safe? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:32–41.
Taghizadeh R, Moustaki M, Harris S, Roblin P, Farhadi J. Does post-mastectomy radiotherapy affect the outcome and prevalence of complications in immediate DIEP breast reconstruction? A prospective cohort study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015;68:1379–1385.
Kronowitz SJ. Current status of autologous tissue-based breast reconstruction in patients receiving postmastectomy radiation therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130:282–292.
Springfield DS. Surgical wound healing. Cancer Treat Res. 1993;67:81–98.
Teotia SS, Venutolo C, Haddock NT. Outcomes in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy undergoing immediate breast reconstruction: Effect of timing, postoperative complications, and delay to radiation therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;144:732e–742e.
Substance Nomenclature:
0 (Anthracyclines)
0 (Bridged-Ring Compounds)
0 (Taxoids)
1605-68-1 (taxane)
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20211013 Date Completed: 20220120 Latest Revision: 20230717
Update Code:
20240104
DOI:
10.1097/PRS.0000000000008505
PMID:
34644277
Czasopismo naukowe
Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy before mastectomy helps reduce tumor burden and pathologic response in breast cancer. Limited evidence exists regarding how neoadjuvant chemotherapy impacts outcomes following microvascular breast reconstruction. This study examines the effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens and schedules on microvascular breast reconstruction complication rates and also assesses the effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on circulating immune cells related to wound healing.
Methods: Patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and microvascular breast reconstruction at Yale New Haven Hospital between 2013 and 2018 were identified. Demographic variables, oncologic history, chemotherapy regimens, and complication profiles were collected. Chemotherapy regimens were stratified by inclusion of anthracycline and order of taxane administration. Chi-square, Fisher's exact, and t tests were used for univariate analysis. Multivariate binary logistic regression was used to control for covariates.
Results: One hundred patients met inclusion criteria. On multivariate analysis, the administration of taxane first in an anthracycline-containing chemotherapy sequence was associated with increased complications (OR, 3.521; p = 0.012), particularly fat necrosis (OR, 2.481; p = 0.040). In the logistic regression model evaluating the effect of the taxane-first regimen on complication rates, the area under the curve was estimated to be 0.760 (p < 0.0001), particularly fat necrosis 0.635 (p < 0.05). The dosage of chemotherapy, number of days between neoadjuvant chemotherapy completion and surgery, and number of circulating immune cells did not significantly differ among patients who experienced complications.
Conclusions: Taxane-first, anthracycline-containing neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens were associated with increased complications, particularly fat necrosis. The increased postreconstruction complication risk must be weighed against the benefits of taxane-first regimens in improving tumor outcome.
Clinical Question/level of Evidence: Therapeutic, III.
(Copyright © 2021 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.)
Comment in: Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 Dec 1;148(6):1197-1198. (PMID: 34847106)

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies