Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

Safety profile of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine: a disproportionality analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database.

Tytuł:
Safety profile of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine: a disproportionality analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database.
Autorzy:
Papazisis G; Department of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece. .
Siafis S
Cepatyte D
Giannis D
Stamoula E
Tzachanis D
Egberts T
Źródło:
European review for medical and pharmacological sciences [Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci] 2021 Oct; Vol. 25 (19), pp. 6003-6012.
Typ publikacji:
Comparative Study; Journal Article
Język:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Original Publication: Rome : Verduci, [1997-
MeSH Terms:
Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems*
United States Food and Drug Administration*
Chloroquine/*adverse effects
Hydroxychloroquine/*adverse effects
Confidence Intervals ; Databases, Factual ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Odds Ratio ; Pharmacovigilance ; Suicide ; United States ; COVID-19 Drug Treatment
Substance Nomenclature:
4QWG6N8QKH (Hydroxychloroquine)
886U3H6UFF (Chloroquine)
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20211018 Date Completed: 20211028 Latest Revision: 20221207
Update Code:
20240104
DOI:
10.26355/eurrev_202110_26878
PMID:
34661260
Czasopismo naukowe
Objective: The present study aims to identify potential safety signals of chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), over the period preceding their repurpose as COVID-19 treatment options, through the analysis of safety data retrieved from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) pharmacovigilance database.
Materials and Methods: We performed a disproportionality analysis of FAERS data between the first quarter of 2004 and December 2019 using the OpenVigil2.1-MedDRA software. Disproportionality was quantified using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and its 95% confidence interval (CIs). The reported mortality of CQ and HCQ was also investigated.
Results: The dataset contained 6,635,356 reports. Comparison of the RORs revealed significant differences between CQ and HCQ for the following adverse events: cardiomyopathy, cardiac arrhythmias, retinal disorders, corneal disorders, hearing disorders, headache, hepatic disorders, severe cutaneous reactions, musculoskeletal disorders, and cytopenia. Only CQ was associated with psychotic disorders, suicide, self-injury, convulsions, peripheral neuropathy, and decreased appetite. In multivariable logistic regression, death was more frequently associated with CQ use, advanced age, male sex, co-reported suicide and self-injury, cardiomyopathy, cardiac arrhythmias, and decreased appetite.
Conclusions: Our results confirm previously published evidence and suggest that HCQ has a safer clinical profile compared to CQ, and thus could serve as the drug of choice for future therapeutic purposes.

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies