Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

Assessment of a New Lateral Cushioned Casting Orthosis: Effects on Peroneus Longus Muscle Electromyographic Activity During Running.

Tytuł:
Assessment of a New Lateral Cushioned Casting Orthosis: Effects on Peroneus Longus Muscle Electromyographic Activity During Running.
Autorzy:
Sánchez-Gómez R; Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Romero-Morales C; Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Gómez-Carrión Á; Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Zaragoza-García I; Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.; Care Research Group (Invecuid), 12 de Octubre Hospital Institute of Health Research (imas12), Madrid, Spain.
Martínez-Sebastián C; Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Ortuño-Soriano I; Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain.
Gómez-Lara A; Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
De la Cruz-Torres B; Department of Physiotherapy, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.
Źródło:
Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine [Orthop J Sports Med] 2021 Dec 09; Vol. 9 (12), pp. 23259671211059152. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Dec 09 (Print Publication: 2021).
Typ publikacji:
Journal Article
Język:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Original Publication: [Thousand Oaks, CA] : Sage on behalf of: The American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine, [2013]-
References:
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2006 Dec;21(10):1074-80. (PMID: 16930793)
Clin J Sport Med. 2001 Jan;11(1):2-9. (PMID: 11176139)
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Dec;43(12):2335-43. (PMID: 21552159)
Gait Posture. 2013 Jul;38(3):490-4. (PMID: 23507028)
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018 Jun;82:126-132. (PMID: 29597146)
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2009 Sep-Oct;99(5):415-21. (PMID: 19767548)
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2010 Aug;25(7):728-36. (PMID: 20538390)
J Foot Ankle Res. 2016 Aug 22;9(1):33. (PMID: 27555883)
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1986 May;76(5):275-6. (PMID: 3712254)
Med Clin North Am. 2014 Mar;98(2):313-29. (PMID: 24559877)
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2018 May 29;:1-22. (PMID: 29809077)
Sports Med. 1985 Sep-Oct;2(5):334-47. (PMID: 3850616)
Hum Mov Sci. 2015 Aug;42:27-37. (PMID: 25935850)
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Dec;35(12):2060-8. (PMID: 14652503)
Gait Posture. 2009 Feb;29(2):172-87. (PMID: 18922696)
Br J Sports Med. 2017 Jan;51(2):86-96. (PMID: 27919918)
Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Oct 16;8(10):2325967120956914. (PMID: 33150189)
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2000 Oct;10(5):361-74. (PMID: 11018445)
J Phys Ther Sci. 2016 Dec;28(12):3458-3462. (PMID: 28174473)
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2006 Jan;21(1):89-98. (PMID: 16182419)
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1993 Oct;18(4):532-6. (PMID: 8220411)
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Jun 05;20(11):. (PMID: 32516907)
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018 Dec;88:196-200. (PMID: 30179793)
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2019 Dec;43(6):576-596. (PMID: 31547793)
Gait Posture. 2006 Apr;23(3):295-302. (PMID: 15946847)
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 13;17(20):. (PMID: 33066291)
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Aug;43(8):1500-6. (PMID: 21233779)
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018 Jul;50(7):1449-1456. (PMID: 29509638)
Foot Ankle Int. 2020 Apr;41(4):457-462. (PMID: 31994419)
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1986 Nov;76(11):648-52. (PMID: 3814239)
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1993 Aug;83(8):433-41. (PMID: 8366431)
Foot (Edinb). 2010 Mar;20(1):1-6. (PMID: 20434673)
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1992 Apr;82(4):177-88. (PMID: 1597827)
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74. (PMID: 843571)
Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 1994 Apr;11(2):231-9. (PMID: 8205510)
Int J Surg. 2014 Dec;12(12):1495-9. (PMID: 25046131)
J Anat. 1954 Jan;88(1):25-30. (PMID: 13129168)
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004 Nov;36(11):1972-6. (PMID: 15514515)
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999 May;80(5):540-4. (PMID: 10326918)
Contributed Indexing:
Keywords: orthosis; peroneus longus; supination; surface electromyography
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20211217 Latest Revision: 20220429
Update Code:
20240104
PubMed Central ID:
PMC8669125
DOI:
10.1177/23259671211059152
PMID:
34917693
Czasopismo naukowe
Background: Classical medial wedge (CMW) orthoses have been prescribed to treat overpronation foot pathologies in runners. The effects of a novel supination orthosis (NSO) on the surface electromyography (EMG) activity of the peroneus longus (PL) muscle during a complete cycle of running have yet to be tested.
Purpose/hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to compare the EMG activity of the PL in participants wearing CMW orthoses and NSOs versus neutral running shoes (NRS) during a full cycle of running gait. It was hypothesized that the PL muscle activity would be lower for the NSO compared with CMW or NRS.
Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.
Methods: Included were 31 healthy recreational runners of both sexes (14 male and 17 female; mean age, 38.58 ± 4.02 years) with a neutral Foot Posture Index and standard rearfoot-strike pattern. Participants ran on a treadmill at 9 km/h while wearing NSO (3-, 6-, and 9-mm thicknesses), CMW (3-, 6-, and 9-mm thicknesses), and NRS, for a total of 7 different conditions randomly selected, while the EMG signal activity of the PL was recorded for 30 seconds. Each trial was recorded 3 times, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) to test reliability of the measurements was calculated. The Wilcoxon pair to pair nonparametric test with Bonferroni correction was performed to analyze differences among the conditions.
Results: The reliability of all assessments was almost perfect (ICC, >0.81). For both the CMW and NSO, regardless of thickness, the PL activity was statistically significantly lower compared with the NRS ( P < .05 for all). For all CMW thicknesses, the PL activity was lower compared with the respective NSO thicknesses, with the 3-mm thickness having the largest difference (CMW 3mm , 18.63 ± 4.64 vs NSO 3mm , 20.78 ± 4.99 mV; P < .001).
Conclusion: Both CMW and NSO produced reduced EMG activity of the PL muscle; therefore, they can be prescribed to treat overpronation pathologies without associated PL strain concerns. In addition, the NSO saved the enhancement material placed on the medial-rear side of CMW, making it easier to wear sports shoes.
Clinical Relevance: Knowing the safety of CMW and NSO will aid in understanding treatments for overpronation pathologies.
Competing Interests: The authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest in the authorship and publication of this contribution. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.
(© The Author(s) 2021.)

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies