Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

Assessing Interpersonal Relationships in Medical Education: the Connection Index.

Tytuł:
Assessing Interpersonal Relationships in Medical Education: the Connection Index.
Autorzy:
Puder D; Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA, USA. .
Dominguez C; Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Borecky A; Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Ing A; University of California at Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
Ing K; University of California at Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
Martinez AE; Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Pereau M; Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Kashner TM; Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA, USA.; Office of Academic Affiliations, Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, USA.
Źródło:
Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry [Acad Psychiatry] 2022 Dec; Vol. 46 (6), pp. 683-691. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Jan 22.
Typ publikacji:
Journal Article
Język:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Publication: 2014- : New York, NY : Springer
Original Publication: [Washington, DC : American Psychiatric Press, c1989-
MeSH Terms:
Internship and Residency*
Education, Medical*
Burnout, Professional*/psychology
Female ; Humans ; Male ; Reproducibility of Results ; Education, Medical, Graduate ; Clinical Competence
References:
Kennedy TJT, Regehr G, Baker GR, Lingard LA. Progressive independence in clinical training: a tradition worth defending? Acad Med. 2005;80(10 Suppl):S106-111. (PMID: 10.1097/00001888-200510001-0002816199447)
Fnais N, Soobiah C, Chen MH, Lillie E, Perrier L, Tashkhandi M, et al. Harassment and discrimination in medical training: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Med. 2014;89(5):817–27. (PMID: 10.1097/ACM.000000000000020024667512)
Holmes EG, Connolly A, Putnam KT, Penaskovic KM, Denniston CR, Clark LH, et al. Taking care of our own: a multispecialty study of resident and program director perspectives on contributors to burnout and potential interventions. Acad Psychiatry. 2017;41(2):159–66. (PMID: 10.1007/s40596-016-0590-327436125)
Pereira-Lima K, Gupta RR, Guille C, Sen S. Residency program factors associated with depressive symptoms in internal medicine interns: a prospective cohort study. Acad Med. 2019;94(6):869–75. (PMID: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002567305705006538448)
Takayesu JK, Ramoska EA, Clark TR, Hansoti B, Dougherty J, Freeman W, et al. Factors associated with burnout during emergency medicine residency. Acad Emerg Med. 2014;21(9):1031–5. (PMID: 10.1111/acem.12464)
Ripp JA, Privitera MR, West CP, Leiter R, Logio L, Shapiro J, et al. Well-being in graduate medical education: a call for action. Acad Med. 2017;92(7):914–7. (PMID: 10.1097/ACM.000000000000173528471780)
West CP, Shanafelt TD, Kolars JC. Quality of life, burnout, educational debt, and medical knowledge among internal medicine residents. JAMA. 2011;306(9):952–60. (PMID: 10.1001/jama.2011.124721900135)
Shanafelt TD, Balch CM, Bechamps G, Russell T, Dyrbye L, Satele D, et al. Burnout and medical errors among American surgeons. Ann Surg. 2010;251(6):995–1000. (PMID: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181bfdab319934755)
Fahrenkopf AM, Sectish TC, Barger LK, Sharek PJ, Lewin D, Chiang VW, et al. Rates of medication errors among depressed and burnt out residents: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2008;336(7642):488–91. (PMID: 10.1136/bmj.39469.763218.BE182589312258399)
Appelbaum NP, Dow A, Mazmanian PE, Jundt DK, Appelbaum EN. The effects of power, leadership and psychological safety on resident event reporting. Med Educ. 2016;50(3):343–50. (PMID: 10.1111/medu.1294726896019)
Edmondson A. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Adm Sci Q. 1999;44(2):350–83. (PMID: 10.2307/2666999)
Summary of Changes to ACGME Common Program Requirements Section VI [Internet]. [cited 2020 Sep 6]. Available from: https://www.acgme.org/What-We-Do/Accreditation/Common-Program-Requirements/Summary-of-Proposed-Changes-to-ACGME-Common-Program-Requirements-Section-VI.
Kolbe MA, Burtscher MJ, Wacker J, Grande B, Nohynkova R, Manser T, et al. Speaking up is related to better team performance in simulated anesthesia inductions: an observational study. Anesth Analg. 2012;115(5):1099–108. (PMID: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318269cd3223011565)
Torralba KD, Loo LK, Byrne JM, Baz S, Cannon GW, Keitz SA, et al. Does psychological safety impact the clinical learning environment for resident physicians? Results From the VA’s Learners’ Perceptions Survey. J Grad Med Educ. 2016;8(5):699–707. (PMID: 10.4300/JGME-D-15-00719.1280185345180524)
Van de Ridder JMM, Stokking KM, McGaghie WC, ten Cate OTJ. What is feedback in clinical education? Med Educ. 2008;42(2):189–97. (PMID: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02973.x18230092)
Hewson MG, Little ML. Giving feedback in medical education. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13(2):111–6. (PMID: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00027.x95023711496906)
Ripp J, Babyatsky M, Fallar R, Bazari H, Bellini L, Kapadia C, et al. The incidence and predictors of job burnout in first-year internal medicine residents: a five-institution study. Acad Med. 2011;86(10):1304–10. (PMID: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31822c123621869661)
Kane GC, Gotto JL, Mangione S, West S, Hojat M. Jefferson scale of patient’s perceptions of physician empathy: preliminary psychometric data. Croat Med J. 2007;48(1):81–6. (PMID: 173091432080494)
Del Canale S, Louis DZ, Maio V, Wang X, Rossi G, Hojat M, et al. The relationship between physician empathy and disease complications: an empirical study of primary care physicians and their diabetic patients in Parma, Italy. Acad Med. 2012;87(9):1243–9. (PMID: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182628fbf22836852)
Telio S, Ajjawi R, Regehr G. The, “educational alliance” as a framework for reconceptualizing feedback in medical education. Acad Med. 2015;90(5):609–14. (PMID: 10.1097/ACM.000000000000056025406607)
McGuire-Snieckus R, McCabe R, Catty J, Hansson L, Priebe S. A new scale to assess the therapeutic relationship in community mental health care: STAR. Psychol Med. 2007;37(1):85–95. (PMID: 10.1017/S003329170600929917094819)
Martin DJ, Garske JP, Davis MK. Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: a meta-analytic review. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000;68(3):438–50. (PMID: 10.1037/0022-006X.68.3.43810883561)
Puder DA, Borecky A, Ascher G, Cunningham A, Wong, J, Riantawan S, Ale-Salvo D, Kashner MT. Connection Index Manual V011, October 16 , 2021 http://medicaleducationresearch.com/connection-index.
Maslach C, Jackson SE. The measurement of experienced burnout. J Organ Behav. 1981;2(2):99–113. (PMID: 10.1002/job.4030020205)
Kashner TM, Clarke CT, Aron DC, Byrne JM, Cannon GW, Deemer DA, et al. The 9-criteria evaluation framework for perceptions survey: the case of VA’s Learners’ Perceptions Survey. Biostatistics & Epidemiology. 2020;4(1):140–71. (PMID: 10.1080/24709360.2018.1553362)
Messick S. Validity. In: Educational measurement, 3rd ed. American Council on Education; 1989. p. 13–103. (The American Council on Education/Macmillan series on higher education).
Kane M. Validating score interpretations and uses. Lang Test. 2012;29(1):3–17. (PMID: 10.1177/0265532211417210)
Angus L, Kagan F. Empathic relational bonds and personal agency in psychotherapy: implications for psychotherapy supervision, practice, and research. Psychotherapy (Chic). 2007;44(4):371–7. (PMID: 10.1037/0033-3204.44.4.37122122315)
Nienhuis JB, Owen J, Valentine JC, Winkeljohn Black S, Halford TC, Parazak SE, et al. Therapeutic alliance, empathy, and genuineness in individual adult psychotherapy: a meta-analytic review. Psychother Res. 2018;28(4):593–605. (PMID: 10.1080/10503307.2016.120402327389666)
Smith ME. Fostering psychological safety through facework: the importance of the effective delivery of performance feedback [Internet] [Thesis]. 2006 [cited 2020 Sep 6]. Available from: https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/handle/2152/2964.
Dormann C, Zapf D. Social support, social stressors at work, and depressive symptoms: testing for main and moderating effects with structural equations in a three-wave longitudinal study. J Appl Psychol. 1999;84(6):874–84. (PMID: 10.1037/0021-9010.84.6.87410639907)
Constable JF, Russell DW. The effect of social support and the work environment upon burnout among nurses. J Human Stress. 1986;12(1):20–6. (PMID: 10.1080/0097840X.1986.99367623559184)
IsHak WW, Lederer S, Mandili C, Nikravesh R, Seligman L, Vasa M, et al. Burnout during residency training: a literature review. J Grad Med Educ. 2009;1(2):236–42. (PMID: 10.4300/JGME-D-09-00054.1219759852931238)
Arndt BG, Beasley JW, Watkinson MD, Temte JL, Tuan W-J, Sinsky CA, et al. Tethered to the EHR: primary care physician workload assessment using EHR event log data and time-motion observations. Ann Fam Med. 2017;15(5):419–26. (PMID: 10.1370/afm.2121288938115593724)
Dyrbye LN, West CP, Satele D, Boone S, Tan L, Sloan J, et al. Burnout among U.S. medical students, residents, and early career physicians relative to the general U.S. population. Acad Med. 2014;89(3):443–51. (PMID: 10.1097/ACM.000000000000013424448053)
Sutzko DC, Boniakowski AE, Nikolian VC, Georgoff PE, Matusko N, Thompson-Burdine JA, et al. Alignment of personality is associated with increased intraoperative entrustment. Ann Surg. 2019;270(6):1058–64. (PMID: 10.1097/SLA.000000000000281329794849)
Farnan JM, Johnson JK, Meltzer DO, Humphrey HJ, Arora VM. On-call supervision and resident autonomy: from micromanager to absentee attending. Am J Med. 2009;122(8):784–8. (PMID: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.04.01119635283)
Chadaga AR, Villines D, Krikorian A. Bullying in the American Graduate Medical Education System: a national cross-sectional survey. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(3):e0150246. (PMID: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150246269827054794154)
Ahrweiler F, Neumann M, Goldblatt H, Hahn EG, Scheffer C. Determinants of physician empathy during medical education: hypothetical conclusions from an exploratory qualitative survey of practicing physicians. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14:122. (PMID: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-122249527364080581)
Panagioti M, Panagopoulou E, Bower P, Lewith G, Kontopantelis E, Chew-Graham C, et al. Controlled interventions to reduce burnout in physicians: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(2):195–205. (PMID: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.767427918798)
Contributed Indexing:
Keywords: Educational alliance; Empathy; Feedback; Psychological safety; Supervision
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20220122 Date Completed: 20221201 Latest Revision: 20221201
Update Code:
20240105
DOI:
10.1007/s40596-021-01574-0
PMID:
35064549
Czasopismo naukowe
Objective: The relationship between a resident physician and his/her supervising attending is foundational to graduate medical education and may impact the clinical learning environment and resident well-being. This paper focuses on how to measure connection between a resident and their clinical supervisor. Connection includes the subdomains of psychological safety, empathy, educational alliance, and feedback.
Methods: After reviewing the literature, the authors designed the 12-item, 7-point Connection Index (CI 12 ) to quantitatively measure connections between a resident and his/her supervisor during a 6-month period (supervision dyad), and based on educational alliance, empathy, psychological safety, and effective feedback. A 9-criteria evaluation framework was applied to assess its reliability and validity on a sample of psychiatry residents at a residency program, July 2016 through June 2018.
Results: Out of a total possible number of 50 residents, 100% participated to rate 41 supervisors over 201 supervision dyads; the CI 12 satisfied all eight of the eight testable criteria, including high scalability (H = 0.78), consistency (alpha = 0.98), test-retest validity (ICC = 0.95), and construct validity where CI 12 was found to have statistically significant correlations with outcomes measures (greater connection was associated with less negative emotional experiences, less mistreatment or bias, less burnout, and higher attendance to supervision sessions).
Conclusion: The authors showed the CI 12 can be a valid and reliable instrument to quantify whether a resident and his/her supervisor connects during a 6-month supervision with respect to empathy, psychological safety, educational alliance, and feedback. We recommend assessing connections as part of the overall evaluation of a resident's experience with the clinical learning environment.
(© 2021. Academic Psychiatry.)

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies