Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

Epidemics and local governments in struggling nations: COVID-19 in Lebanon.

Tytuł:
Epidemics and local governments in struggling nations: COVID-19 in Lebanon.
Autorzy:
Al-Mulki JM; Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Hassoun MH; Department of Critical Care, Rafik Hariri University Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon.
Adib SM; Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Źródło:
PloS one [PLoS One] 2022 Jan 27; Vol. 17 (1), pp. e0262048. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Jan 27 (Print Publication: 2022).
Typ publikacji:
Journal Article
Język:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science
MeSH Terms:
Local Government*
COVID-19/*epidemiology
Health Policy/*trends
COVID-19/economics ; Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration ; Delivery of Health Care/trends ; Epidemics/prevention & control ; Federal Government ; Health Personnel ; Health Policy/economics ; Humans ; Lebanon/epidemiology ; Qualitative Research ; SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity ; Social Stigma ; Stakeholder Participation ; Vulnerable Populations
References:
Hum Resour Health. 2013 Sep 30;11:49. (PMID: 24079458)
BMC Public Health. 2009 Jul 16;9:242. (PMID: 19607669)
Pulmonology. 2021 Mar-Apr;27(2):110-115. (PMID: 32540223)
Scand J Public Health. 2009 Mar;37(2):187-200. (PMID: 19179450)
J Community Health. 2020 Aug;45(4):689-695. (PMID: 32468155)
J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2017 Apr;50(2):125-132. (PMID: 28089098)
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 28;13(11):e0206595. (PMID: 30485311)
J Health Commun. 2017;22(sup1):5-9. (PMID: 28854136)
Front Public Health. 2020 Aug 28;8:429. (PMID: 32984238)
N Engl J Med. 2020 Aug 6;383(6):510-512. (PMID: 32283003)
Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2021 Jun;25(2):152-163. (PMID: 33587678)
Glob Health Promot. 2021 Mar;28(1):33-41. (PMID: 33472532)
Lancet Public Health. 2020 Jun;5(6):e311. (PMID: 32334648)
Nat Med. 2021 Mar;27(3):396-400. (PMID: 33723454)
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Jun;8(6):e790-e798. (PMID: 32573443)
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 May;5(5):. (PMID: 32409327)
J Community Health. 2021 Jun;46(3):487-493. (PMID: 32661861)
Appl Res Qual Life. 2021;16(5):1925-1942. (PMID: 32837605)
Am J Infect Control. 2017 Mar 1;45(3):301-302. (PMID: 27776823)
Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2020;29(2):e2020166. (PMID: 32348404)
J Int AIDS Soc. 2020 May;23(5):e25504. (PMID: 32365283)
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Jun 12;8(2):. (PMID: 32545647)
Appl Res Qual Life. 2023;18(1):43-70. (PMID: 36340746)
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20220127 Date Completed: 20220203 Latest Revision: 20230917
Update Code:
20240105
PubMed Central ID:
PMC8794115
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0262048
PMID:
35085281
Czasopismo naukowe
Municipalities in Lebanon represent local governments at the basic community level. The proximity of the municipality to the local community and its knowledge of available resources, can be crucial in easing the impact of any disaster. This study aimed to document the range of preparedness/reactivity of municipalities as COVID-19 swept through Lebanon. A qualitative case study was implemented to explore municipal response to control the epidemic, using in-depth semi-structured interviews with twenty-seven stakeholders from nine municipalities across all governorates in Lebanon. In each municipality, participants included mayors/deputy mayors, available members of municipal councils, prominent community leaders, health care professionals, and managers of local NGOs. The collected data were analyzed using the comparative thematic analysis. The socioecological model was adopted to illustrate the dynamic interplay between the barriers and facilitators at all ecological levels. The response to the pandemic differed significantly in volume and nature among different municipalities across regions, with rural areas clearly disadvantaged in terms of adequacy and completeness of response. Barriers consistently mentioned by most municipalities included economic collapse and poverty, shortage in resources, lack of support from the central government, stigma, lack of awareness, underreporting, flaws in the MOPH surveillance system, impeded accessibility to healthcare services, limited number and weak role of municipal police, increased mental illnesses, and political patronage, favoritism, and interference. On the other hand, increased donations, community engagement, social support and empathy, sufficient human resources, the effective role of healthcare systems, and good governance were identified as key facilitators. The socioecological model identified several multi-level facilitators and loopholes which can be addressed through a suggested strategic "roadmap" providing evidence-based interventions for future epidemics. It is crucial meanwhile that the central government strengthens the administrative and financial resources of municipalities in preparing and rapidly deploying the expected optimal response.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Zaloguj się, aby uzyskać dostęp do pełnego tekstu.

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies