-
Tytuł:
-
If exercise is medicine, why don't we know the dose? An overview of systematic reviews assessing reporting quality of exercise interventions in health and disease.
-
Autorzy:
-
Hansford HJ; School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.; Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
Wewege MA; School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.; Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
Cashin AG; School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.; Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
Hagstrom AD; School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Clifford BK; School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.; School of Nursing Midwifery and Social Work, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
McAuley JH; School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.; Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
Jones MD; School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia .; Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
-
Źródło:
-
British journal of sports medicine [Br J Sports Med] 2022 Jun; Vol. 56 (12), pp. 692-700. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Feb 15.
-
Typ publikacji:
-
Journal Article; Review
-
Język:
-
English
-
Imprint Name(s):
-
Publication: London : BMJ Publishing Group
Original Publication: Loughborough, Eng.
-
MeSH Terms:
-
Exercise Therapy*
Medicine*
Consensus ; Exercise ; Humans ; Systematic Reviews as Topic
-
Contributed Indexing:
-
Keywords: exercise; methods; research; sports medicine
-
Entry Date(s):
-
Date Created: 20220216 Date Completed: 20220602 Latest Revision: 20220602
-
Update Code:
-
20240105
-
DOI:
-
10.1136/bjsports-2021-104977
-
PMID:
-
35168956
-
Objective: To determine how well exercise interventions are reported in trials in health and disease.
Design: Overview of systematic reviews.
Data Sources: PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus and PsycINFO from inception until June 2021.
Eligibility Criteria: Reviews of any health condition were included if they primarily assessed quality of exercise intervention reporting using the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT) or the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR). We assessed review quality using a modified version of A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews.
Results: We identified 7804 studies and included 28 systematic reviews. The median (IQR) percentage of CERT and TIDieR items appropriately reported was 24% (19%) and 49% (33%), respectively. TIDieR items 1, Brief name (median=100%, IQR 4) and 2, Why (median=98%, IQR 6), as well as CERT item 4, Supervision and delivery (median=68%, IQR 89), were the best reported. For replication of exercise interventions, TIDieR item 8, When and how much, was moderately well reported (median=62%, IQR 68) although CERT item 8, Description of each exercise to enable replication (median=23%, IQR 44) and item 13, Detailed description of the exercise intervention (median=24%, IQR 66) were poorly reported. Quality of systematic reviews ranged from moderate to critically low quality.
Conclusion: Exercise interventions are poorly reported across a range of health conditions. If exercise is medicine, then how it is prescribed and delivered is unclear, potentially limiting its translation from research to practice.
Prospero Registration Number: CRD42021261285; Open Science Framework: osf.io/my3ec/.
Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared.
(© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)
