Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

CORR Insights®: What Is the Maximum Tibial Tunnel Angle for Transtibial PCL Reconstruction? A Comparison Based on Virtual Radiographs, CT Images, and 3D Knee Models.

Tytuł:
CORR Insights®: What Is the Maximum Tibial Tunnel Angle for Transtibial PCL Reconstruction? A Comparison Based on Virtual Radiographs, CT Images, and 3D Knee Models.
Autorzy:
Gilmer BB; Orthopaedic Surgeon, Mammoth Orthopedic Institute, Mammoth Lakes, CA, USA.
Źródło:
Clinical orthopaedics and related research [Clin Orthop Relat Res] 2022 May 01; Vol. 480 (5), pp. 929-931. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Mar 02.
Typ publikacji:
Journal Article; Comment
Język:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Publication: 2018- : [New York, NY] : Wolters Kluwer
Original Publication: Philadelphia : Lippincott,
MeSH Terms:
Knee Joint*/diagnostic imaging
Knee Joint*/surgery
Tibia*/diagnostic imaging
Tibia*/surgery
Humans ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
References:
Ahmad CS, Cohen ZA, Levine WN, Gardner TR, Ateshian GA, Mow VC. Codominance of the individual posterior cruciate ligament bundles: an analysis of bundle lengths and orientation. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31:221-225.
Gwinner C, Jung TM, Schatka I, Weiler A. Posterior laxity increases over time after PCL reconstruction. Knee Surg Spots Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019;27:389-396.
Höher J, Scheffler S, Weiler A. Graft choice and graft fixation in PCL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2003;11:297-306.
LaPrade RF, Cinque ME, Dornan GJ, et al. Double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in 100 patients at a mean 3 years’ follow-up: outcomes were comparable to anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Am J Sports Med . 2018;46:1809-1818.
Lee DY, Park YJ. Single-bundle versus double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2017;29:246-255.
Li Y, Zhang J, Song G, Li X, Feng H. The mechanism of “killer turn” causing residual laxity after transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol. 2016;3:13-18.
Lin Y, Cai W, Huang X, Li J, Li Q. [The killer turn in the posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: mechanism and improvement] [in Chinese]. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020;34:787-792.
Mauro CS, Sekiya JK, Stabile KJ, Haemmerle MJ, Harner CD. Double-bundle PCL and posterolateral corner reconstruction components are codominant. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:2247-2254.
Milles JL, Nuelle CW, Pfeiffer F, et al. Biomechanical comparison: single-bundle versus double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques. J Knee Surg. 2017;30:347-351.
Nicodeme JD, Löcherbach C, Jolles BM. Tibial tunnel placement in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22:1556-1562.
Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD. Posterior cruciate ligament revision reconstruction, part 1: causes of surgical failure in 52 consecutive operations. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33:646-654.
Okoroafor UC, Saint-Preux F, Gill SW, Bledsoe G, Kaar SG. Nonanatomic tibial tunnel placement for single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction leads to greater posterior tibial translation in a biomechanical model. Arthroscopy. 20161;32:1354-1358.
Qi YS, Wang HJ, Wang SJ, Zhang ZZ, Huang AB, Yu JK. A systematic review of double-bundle versus single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. BMC Musculoskelet Disord . 2016;27:45.
Shin YS, Kim HJ, Lee DH. No clinically important difference in knee scores or instability between transtibial and inlay techniques for PCL reconstruction: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475:1239-1248.
Teng Y, Da L, Jia J, et al. What is the maximum tibial tunnel angle for transtibial PCL reconstruction? A comparison based on virtual radiographs, CT images, and 3D knee models. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022;480:918-928.
Winkler PW, Wagala NN, Carrozzi S, et al. Low posterior tibial slope is associated with increased risk of PCL graft failure. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-021-06760-z . (PMID: 10.1007/s00167-021-06760-z)
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20220303 Date Completed: 20220421 Latest Revision: 20230815
Update Code:
20240105
PubMed Central ID:
PMC9007204
DOI:
10.1097/CORR.0000000000002151
PMID:
35238801
Czasopismo naukowe
Competing Interests: The author certifies that there are no funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article related to the author or any immediate family members. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.
Comment on: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 May 1;480(5):918-928. (PMID: 35023873)

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies