Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

Water Polo Offensive Methods after the 2018 FINA Rules Update.

Tytuł:
Water Polo Offensive Methods after the 2018 FINA Rules Update.
Autorzy:
Canossa S; Centre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport, Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal.
Fernandes RJ; Centre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport, Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal.; Porto Biomechanics Laboratory, Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal.
Estriga L; Centre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport, Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal.
Abraldes JA; Research Group MS&SPORT, Faculty of Sports Sciences, University of Murcia, 30720 Murcia, Spain.
Lupo C; Neuro Muscular Function Research Group, Department of Medical Sciences, School of Exercise and Sport Sciences, University of Turin, 10143 Turin, Italy.
Garganta JM; Centre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport, Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal.
Źródło:
International journal of environmental research and public health [Int J Environ Res Public Health] 2022 Feb 23; Vol. 19 (5). Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Feb 23.
Typ publikacji:
Journal Article
Język:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Original Publication: Basel : MDPI, c2004-
MeSH Terms:
Athletic Performance*
Water Sports*
Achievement ; Humans ; Spain ; Team Sports
References:
J Strength Cond Res. 2013 Apr;27(4):893-901. (PMID: 22692107)
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 25;11:547110. (PMID: 33071863)
J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Jan;24(1):223-9. (PMID: 19996771)
J Sports Sci Med. 2012 Sep 01;11(3):516-25. (PMID: 24149362)
Biol Sport. 2017 Jun;34(2):177-183. (PMID: 28566812)
J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Nov;33(11):3188-3199. (PMID: 29912072)
J Sports Sci. 2006 Nov;24(11):1173-81. (PMID: 17175615)
J Hum Kinet. 2020 Mar 31;72:203-214. (PMID: 32269661)
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2016 Apr;56(4):399-405. (PMID: 25651897)
J Strength Cond Res. 2016 Apr;30(4):1014-20. (PMID: 26999289)
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2016 Sep;56(9):997-1006. (PMID: 26004042)
J Sports Sci. 2012 May;30(9):889-97. (PMID: 22530796)
Contributed Indexing:
Keywords: elite teams; match analysis; water polo models; water polo rules
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20220310 Date Completed: 20220415 Latest Revision: 20230308
Update Code:
20240104
PubMed Central ID:
PMC8909295
DOI:
10.3390/ijerph19052568
PMID:
35270261
Czasopismo naukowe
Water polo is a team sport that has been suffering rule changes aiming for a more attractive game. Our goal was to unveil whether different offensive playing styles or methods were adopted by elite national teams from Eastern Europe and from other world countries after the new rules framework was applied at the 2019 FINA World Championship. Additionally, we questioned whether those rules induced a more dynamic game. A total of 648 offensive sequences from games contested by the top-six ranked national squads were analysed. Descriptive statistics, parametric and nonparametric tests were computed, and the effect size was used. The eastern Europeans were the tallest (t (76) = −4.081; p < 0.001, d = 0.42) and the Hungarians were higher than Italians (p = 0.005, dz = −0.41). Offensive time length differed between teams (H (5) = 30.50, p < 0.001) with Serbia being the fastest (Mdn = 22 s). In successful attacks without extra time, Italy was quicker than Spain (17.5 vs. 25.0 s; p = 0.031, dz = −0.36) scoring 30% of their total goals under 20 s, while Australia up to 24% and Croatia, Hungary and Spain ≤ 16.0%. When power-play occurred, the teams’ pass action was different (H (5) = 15.99, p < 0.007), with Italy performing more passes than counterparts, especially Serbia (Mdn = 13 vs. 9, respectively; p= 0.003, dz = 0.20) and with the exception of Hungary. Through fast play sequences, Italy, Serbia and Australia scored up to 33% of their goals, while Spain, Croatia, and Hungary scored ≤ 15%. The power-play contributed to ≥50% of teams’ goals, except for Spain and Australia (48 and 45%, respectively). Playing styles commonly attributed to Eastern vs. non-Eastern Europeans and other worldwide national teams such as Australia were not confirmed. However, offensive trends were perceived and described for the first time, and some base guidelines were suggested to distinguish the static or positional vs. a more dynamic playing model. Rule changes did not seem to induce the expected effects on game dynamics.

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies