Electronic Versus Paper and Pencil Survey Administration Mode Comparison: 2019 Youth Risk Behavior Survey.

Szczegóły
Abstrakt

Tytuł:: Electronic Versus Paper and Pencil Survey Administration Mode Comparison: 2019 Youth Risk Behavior Survey.
Autorzy:: Bryan LN; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Smith-Grant J; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.; United States Public Health Service, Washington, DC.
Brener N; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Kilmer G; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Lo A; Westat Inc., Rockville, MD.
Queen B; Westat Inc., Rockville, MD.
Underwood JM; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Źródło:: The Journal of school health [J Sch Health] 2022 Aug; Vol. 92 (8), pp. 804-811. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Apr 21.
Typ publikacji:: Journal Article
Język:: English
Imprint Name(s):: Publication: Nov. 2008- : Hoboken, NJ : Wiley
Original Publication: Columbus, Ohio : American Association of School Physicians
MeSH Terms:: Adolescent Behavior*
Population Surveillance*
Adolescent ; Electronics ; Humans ; Risk-Taking ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; United States
References:: Underwood JM, Brener N, Halpern-Felsher B. Tracking adolescent health behaviors and outcomes: strengths and weaknesses of the youth risk behavior surveillance system. NAM Perspect. 2020;2020(1):1-5.
Hallfors D, Khatapoush S, Kadushin C, Watson K, Saxe L. A comparison of paper vs computer-assisted self interview for school alcohol, tobacco, and other drug surveys. Eval Program Plann. 2000;23(2):149-155.
Eaton DK, Brener ND, Kann L, et al. Comparison of paper-and-pencil versus web administration of the youth risk behavior survey (YRBS): risk behavior prevalence estimates. Eval Rev. 2010;34(2):137-153.
Colasante E, Benedetti E, Fortunato L, et al. Paper-and-pencil versus computerized administration mode: comparison of data quality and risk behavior prevalence estimates in the European School Survey Project on Alcohol and Other Drugs (ESPAD). PLoS One. 2019;14(11):e0225140.
Mangunkusumo RT, Moorman PW, Van Den Berg-de AE, Van Der Lei J, De Koning HJ, Raat H. Internet-administered adolescent health questionnaires compared with a paper version in a randomized study. J Adolesc Health. 2005;36(1):70.e1-70.e6.
Beebe TJ, Harrison PA, Mcrae JA, Anderson RE, Fulkerson JA. An evaluation of computer-assisted self-interviews in a school setting. Public Opin Q. 1998;62(4):623-632.
Wang Y-C, Lee C-M, Lew-Ting C-Y, Hsiao CK, Chen D-R, Chen WJ. Survey of substance use among high school students in Taipei: web-delivered questionnaire versus paper-and-pencil questionnaire. J Adolesc Health. 2005;37(4):289-295.
Pealer LN, Weiler RM, Pigg RM Jr, Miller D, Dorman SM. The feasibility of a web-based surveillance system to collect health risk behavior data from college students. Health Educ Behav. 2001;28(5):547-559.
Miech RA, Couper MP, Heeringa SG, Patrick ME. The impact of survey mode on US national estimates of adolescent drug prevalence: results from a randomized controlled study. Addiction. 2021;116(5):1144-1151.
Raghupathy S, Hahn-Smith S. The effect of survey mode on high school risk behavior data: a comparison between web and paper-based surveys. Curr Issues Educ. 2013;16(2):1-11.
Vereecken CA, Maes L. Comparison of a computer-administered and paper-and-pencil-administered questionnaire on health and lifestyle behaviors. J Adolesc Health. 2006;38(4):426-432.
Hu SS, Gentzke A, Jamal A, Homa D, Neff L. Feasibility of administering an electronic version of the National Youth Tobacco Survey in a classroom setting. Prev Chronic Dis. 2020;17:E20.
Wasserstein RL, Lazar NA. The ASA statement on p-values: context, process, and purpose. Am Stat. 2016;70(2):129-133.
Kawentel LM, Williams R. Effect size. In: Atkinson P, Delamont S, Cernat A, Sakshaug JW, Williams RA, eds. SAGE Research Methods Foundations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Limited; 2020.
Buehler JW. CDC's vision for public health surveillance in the 21st century. Introduction. MMWR Suppl. 2012;61(3):1-2.
Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
Sullivan GM, Feinn R. Using effect size-or why the P value is not enough. J Grad Med Educ. 2012;4(3):279-282.
Denniston MM, Brener ND, Kann L, et al. Comparison of paper-and-pencil versus web administration of the youth risk behavior survey (YRBS): participation, data quality, and perceived privacy and anonymity. Comput Hum Behav. 2010;26(5):1054-1060.
Sudman S. Examining substance abuse data collection methodologies. J Drug Issues. 2001;31(3):695-716.
Richards CL, Iademarco MF, Anderson TC. A new strategy for public health surveillance at CDC: improving national surveillance activities and outcomes. Public Health Rep. 2014;129(6):472-476.
Contributed Indexing:: Keywords: PAPI; adolescent; electronic surveys; risk behavior; survey mode; survey research methodology
Entry Date(s):: Date Created: 20220421 Date Completed: 20220707 Latest Revision: 20221123
Update Code:: 20240104
DOI:: 10.1111/josh.13184
PMID:: 35445407
: Czasopismo naukowe

Full Text Finder

Background: Since the inception of the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System in 1991, all surveys have been conducted in schools, using paper and pencil instruments (PAPI). For the 2019 YRBSS, sites were offered the opportunity to conduct their surveys using electronic data collection. This study aimed to determine whether differences in select metrics existed between students who completed the survey electronically versus using PAPI.
Methods: Thirty risk behaviors were examined in this study. Data completeness, response rates and bivariate comparisons of risk behavior prevalence between administration modes were examined.
Results: Twenty-nine of 30 questions examined had more complete responses among students using electronic surveys. Small differences were found for student and school response rates between modes. Twenty-five of 30 adolescent risk behaviors showed no mode effect.
Conclusions: Seven of 44 states and DC participated electronically. Because survey data were more complete; school and student response rates were consistent; and minor differences existed in risk behaviors between modes, the acceptability of collecting data electronically was demonstrated.
(© 2022, American School Health Association. This article has been contributed to by U.S. Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.)

Informacja