Joining the meta-research movement: A bibliometric case study of the journal Perspectives on Medical Education. - OpacWWW

Tytuł:: Joining the meta-research movement: A bibliometric case study of the journal Perspectives on Medical Education.
Autorzy:: Maggio LA; Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA. .
Haustein S; School of Information Studies (ÉSIS) and Scholarly Communications Lab, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Costello JA; Henry M. Jackson Foundation, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Driessen EW; Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Artino AR Jr; The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
Źródło:: Perspectives on medical education [Perspect Med Educ] 2022 Jun; Vol. 11 (3), pp. 127-136. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Jun 21.
Typ publikacji:: Journal Article
Język:: English
Imprint Name(s):: Publication: 2023- : [London] : Ubiquity Press
Original Publication: [Houten] : Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
MeSH Terms:: Education, Medical*
Medical Writing*
Bibliometrics ; Data Collection ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Publications ; United States
References:: Ioannidis JPI. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med. 2005;2:e124. (PMID: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124)
Ioannidis JPI. Meta-research: why research on research matters. PLoS Biol. 2018;16:e2005468. (PMID: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2005468)
Peterson D, Panofsky A. Metascience as a scientific social movement. Version 1. SocArXiv. 2020. https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/4dsqa/ . Accessed 3 Feb 2022.
Fanelli D. How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. Plos One. 2009;4:e5738. (PMID: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005738)
Marusic A, Wager E, Utrobicic A, Rothstein HR, Sambunjak D. Interventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.MR000038.pub2 . (PMID: 10.1002/14651858.MR000038.pub2)
Artino AR Jr, Driessen EW, Maggio LA. Ethical shades of gray: international frequency of scientific misconduct and questionable research practices in health professions education. Acad Med. 2019;94:76–84. (PMID: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002412)
Lee CJ, Sugimoto CR, Zhang G, Cronin B. Bias in peer review. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2013;64:2–17. (PMID: 10.1002/asi.22784)
Maggio LA, Bynum WE, Schreiber-Gregory DN, Durning SJ, Artino AR. When will I get my paper back? A replication study of publication timelines for health professions education research. Perspect Med Educ. 2020;9:139–46. (PMID: 10.1007/s40037-020-00576-2)
Himmelstein D. The history of publishing delays. Satoshi Village: the blog of Daniel Himmelstein. 2016. https://blog.dhimmel.com/history-of-delays/ . Accessed 3 Feb 2022.
Piwowar H, Priem J, Larivière V, et al. The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles. Peer J. 2018;6:e4375. (PMID: 10.7717/peerj.4375)
BMJ. Evidence based publishing.. https://www.bmj.com/about-bmj/evidence-based-publishing . Accessed 3 Feb 2022.
PLOS.. https://plos.org/about/ . Accessed 3 Feb 2022.
Otlet P. Traité de documentation. Le Livre sur le Livre: Théorie et Pratique. Bruxelles: Editions Mundaneum; 1934. https://archive.org/details/OtletTraitDocumentationUgent .
Garfield E. Citation indexes for science; a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science. 1955;122:108–11. (PMID: 10.1126/science.122.3159.108)
Sugimoto CR, Larivière V. Measuring research: what everyone needs to know. New York: Oxford University Press; 2018. (PMID: 10.1093/wentk/9780190640118.001.0001)
Demografix ApS.. https://genderize.io/ . Accessed 3 Feb 2022.
Hornstein P, Tuyishime H, Mutebi M, Lasebikan N, Rubagumya F, Fadelu T. Authorship equity and gender representation in global oncology publications. JCO Glob Oncol. 2022;8:e2100369. https://doi.org/10.1200/GO.21.00369 . (PMID: 10.1200/GO.21.00369)
Bhatia S, Cotton CC, Kim E, et al. Gender and nationality trends in manuscripts published in prominent gastroenterology journals between 1997 and 2017. Dig Dis Sci. 2022;67:367–76. (PMID: 10.1007/s10620-021-07021-2)
Maggio LA, Ninkov A, Costello JA, Driessen EW, Artino AR Jr. Knowledge syntheses in medical education: meta-research examining author gender, geographic location, and institutional affiliation. PLoS ONE. 2021;16:e258925. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258925 . (PMID: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258925)
Google. Google sheets. Mountain View: Google; 2022.
Microsoft Corporation. Microsoft Excel. Version 16.59. 2022. https://office.microsoft.com/excel . Accessed 1 June 2022.
van Eck NJ, Waltman L. VOSViewer: Visualizing Scientific Landscapes. 2010. https://www.vosviewer.com . Accessed 1 June 2022.
Maggio LA, Haustein S, Costello JA, Driessen EW, Artino AR Jr. Perspectives on medical education. J Data Suppl Files. 2022; https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6463805 . (PMID: 10.5281/zenodo.6463805)
Varpio L, Nagler A. Perspectives on Medical Education Special Edition : Lessons learned from health professions education scholarship failures surprises. Perspect Med Educ. 2017;6:139–40. (PMID: 10.1007/s40037-017-0355-z)
Maggio LA, Costello JA, Norton C, Driessen EW, Artino AR Jr. Knowledge syntheses in medical education: a bibliometric analysis. Perspect Med Educ. 2021;10:79–87. (PMID: 10.1007/s40037-020-00626-9)
Maggio LA, Costello JA, Ninkov A, Frank JR, Artino AR Jr.. The voices of medical education science: describing the published landscape. BioRxiv.. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.10.479930 . (PMID: 10.1101/2022.02.10.479930)
Madden C, O’Malley R, O’Connor P, O’Dowd E, Byrne D, Lydon S. Gender in authorship and editorship in medical education journals: a bibliometric review. Med Educ. 2021;55:678–88. (PMID: 10.1111/medu.14427)
Thomas EG, Jayabalasingham B, Collins T, Geertzen J, Bui C, Dominici F. Gender disparities in invited commentary authorship in 2459 medical journals. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2:e1913682. (PMID: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.13682)
Teunissen PW, Atherley A, Cleland JJ, et al. Advancing the science of health professions education through a shared understanding of terminology: a content analysis of terms for “faculty”. Perspect Med Educ. 2022;11:22–7. (PMID: 10.1007/s40037-021-00683-8)
Van Noorden R. Open access: The true cost of science publishing [published correction appears in Nature. 2013;496:151] [published correction appears in Nature. 2013;499:19. Nature. 2013;495:426–9. (PMID: 10.1038/495426a)
Ajjawi R, Crampton PES, Ginsburg S, et al. Promoting inclusivity in health professions education publishing. Med Educ. 2022;56:252–6. (PMID: 10.1111/medu.14724)
Kusurkar RA. The leaky pipeline of publications and knowledge generation in medical education. Perspect Med Educ. 2022;11:70–2. (PMID: 10.1007/s40037-022-00700-4)
Public Knowledge Project. Statistics.. https://docs.pkp.sfu.ca/admin-guide/en/statistics . Accessed 27 Mar 2022.
Neubauer, et al. How phenomenology can help us learn from the experiences of others. Perspect Med Educ. 2019;8:90–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-019-0509-2 . (PMID: 10.1007/s40037-019-0509-2)
Varpio. Using rhetorical appeals to credibility, logic, and emotions to increase your persuasiveness. Perspect Med Educ. 2018;7:207–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-018-0420-2 . (PMID: 10.1007/s40037-018-0420-2)
Artino. Academic self-efficacy: from educational theory to instructional practice. Perspect Med Educ. 2012;1:76–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-012-0012-5 . (PMID: 10.1007/s40037-012-0012-5)
Lefroy, et al. Guidelines: the do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. Perspect Med Educ. 2015;4:284–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-015-0231-7 . (PMID: 10.1007/s40037-015-0231-7)
Peters, et al. Bedside teaching in medical education: a literature review. Perspect Med Educ. 2014;3:76–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-013-0083-y . (PMID: 10.1007/s40037-013-0083-y)
Kamphuis. Augmented reality in medical education? Perspect Med Educ. 2014;3:300–11. (PMID: 10.1007/s40037-013-0107-7)
Kogan. Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of direct observation of clinical skills in medical education. Perspect Med Educ. 2017;6:286–305. (PMID: 10.1007/s40037-017-0376-7)
Leppink. The evolution of cognitive load theory and its application to medical education. Perspect Med Educ. 2015;4:119–27. (PMID: 10.1007/s40037-015-0192-x)
Contributed Indexing:: Keywords: Bibliometrics; Journals; Meta-research; Scholarly communication
Entry Date(s):: Date Created: 20220621 Date Completed: 20220630 Latest Revision: 20230207
Update Code:: 20240105
PubMed Central ID:: PMC9210332
DOI:: 10.1007/s40037-022-00717-9
PMID:: 35727471
: Czasopismo naukowe

Pełny tekst

Purpose: To conduct a bibliometric case study of the journal Perspectives on Medical Education (PME) to provide insights into the journal's inner workings and to "take stock" of where PME is today, where it has been, and where it might go.
Methods: Data, including bibliographic metadata, reviewer and author details, and downloads, were collected for manuscripts submitted to and published in PME from the journal's Editorial Manager and Web of Science. Gender of authors and reviewers was predicted using Genderize.io. To visualize and analyze collaboration patterns, citation relationships and term co-occurrence social network analyses (SNA) were conducted. VOSviewer was used to visualize the social network maps.
Results: Between 2012-2019 PME received, on average, 260 manuscripts annually (range = 73-402). Submissions were received from authors in 81 countries with the majority in the United States (US), United Kingdom, and the Netherlands. PME published 518 manuscripts with authors based in 31 countries, the majority being in the Netherlands, US, and Canada. PME articles were downloaded 717,613 times (mean per document: 1388). In total 1201 (55% women) unique peer reviewers were invited and 649 (57% women) completed reviews; 1227 (49% women) unique authors published in PME. SNA revealed that PME authors were quite collaborative, with most authoring articles with others and only a minority (n = 57) acting as single authors.
Discussion: This case study provides a glimpse into PME and offers evidence for PME's next steps. In the future, PME is committed to growing the journal thoughtfully; diversifying and educating editorial teams, authors, and reviewers, and liberating and sharing journal data.
(© 2022. This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply.)

Zaloguj się, aby uzyskać dostęp do pełnego tekstu.

Informacja

Joining the meta-research movement: A bibliometric case study of the journal Perspectives on Medical Education.