-
Tytuł:
-
Codesign approaches involving older adults in the development of electronic healthcare tools: a systematic review.
-
Autorzy:
-
Cole AC; Carolina Health Informatics Program, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA amy_.; Division of Healthcare Engineering, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Adapa K; Carolina Health Informatics Program, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.; Division of Healthcare Engineering, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Khasawneh A; Department of Industrial Engineering, School of Engineering, Mercer University, Macon, Georgia, USA.
Richardson DR; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Mazur L; Carolina Health Informatics Program, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.; Division of Healthcare Engineering, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
-
Źródło:
-
BMJ open [BMJ Open] 2022 Jul 06; Vol. 12 (7), pp. e058390. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Jul 06.
-
Typ publikacji:
-
Journal Article; Systematic Review
-
Język:
-
English
-
Imprint Name(s):
-
Original Publication: [London] : BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, 2011-
-
MeSH Terms:
-
Evidence-Based Practice*
Health Facilities*
Aged ; Delivery of Health Care ; Electronics ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; United States
-
References:
-
J Biomed Inform. 2015 Oct;57:113-23. (PMID: 26184058)
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020 Sep 24;:1-11. (PMID: 32970493)
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097. (PMID: 19621072)
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Dec;60(6):1181-1192.e1. (PMID: 32615298)
Gerontologist. 2020 Jul 15;60(5):935-946. (PMID: 31773140)
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Jun;69(6):1469-1478. (PMID: 33615433)
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 26;17(11):. (PMID: 32466484)
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020 Jan;16(1):54-61. (PMID: 30853507)
Laryngoscope. 2019 Dec;129(12):2733-2739. (PMID: 30663068)
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Nov;102(11):1977-1984. (PMID: 31176556)
JMIR Hum Factors. 2016 Jan 14;3(1):e2. (PMID: 27025985)
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 27;22(4):e13780. (PMID: 32338617)
Gerontologist. 2019 Jan 9;59(1):e16-e25. (PMID: 29788319)
Gerontologist. 2020 Sep 15;60(7):e513-e523. (PMID: 31773145)
Am J Audiol. 2018 Nov 19;27(3S):403-416. (PMID: 30452745)
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. (PMID: 33782057)
Appl Clin Inform. 2019 Aug;10(4):707-718. (PMID: 31533172)
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019 Jan;28(1):e12882. (PMID: 30015998)
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 19;22(8):e17406. (PMID: 32442151)
JMIR Res Protoc. 2012 Nov 08;1(2):e13. (PMID: 23612015)
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Dec;120:126-136. (PMID: 30409337)
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jul 21;8(7):e17703. (PMID: 32706745)
Med 2 0. 2013 Oct 08;2(2):e12. (PMID: 25075235)
Gerontologist. 2021 Sep 13;61(7):e395-e409. (PMID: 32506136)
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 May 30;5(5):e71. (PMID: 28559227)
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Dec 18;20(12):e294. (PMID: 30563822)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 12;4:CD001431. (PMID: 28402085)
-
Contributed Indexing:
-
Keywords: health informatics; information technology; qualitative research; statistics & research methods
-
Entry Date(s):
-
Date Created: 20220706 Date Completed: 20220708 Latest Revision: 20220726
-
Update Code:
-
20240105
-
PubMed Central ID:
-
PMC9260797
-
DOI:
-
10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058390
-
PMID:
-
35793923
-
Objective: The primary aim was to review and synthesise the current evidence of how older adults are involved in codesign approaches to develop electronic healthcare tools (EHTs). The secondary aim was to identify how the codesign approaches used mutual learning techniques to benefit older adult participants.
Design: Systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews 2020 checklist.
Data Sources: PubMed, Embase and Scopus databases were searched for studies from January 2010 to March 2021.
Eligibility Criteria: Inclusion criteria were studies employing codesign approaches to develop an EHTs, and the study population was aged 60 years and older.
Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data were extracted for analysis and risk of bias. We evaluated the quality of studies using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Evidence-based Practice Center approach.
Results: Twenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria for this review. All studies used at least two involvement processes, with interviews and prototypes used most frequently. Through cross-classification, we found an increased utilisation of functional prototypes in studies reaching the 'empower' level of participation and found that studies which benefitted from mutual learning had a higher utilisation of specific involvement processes such as focus groups and functional prototyping.
Conclusions: We found gaps to support which involvement processes, participation levels and learning models should be employed when codesigning with older adults. This is important because higher levels of participation may increase the user's knowledge of technology, enhance learning and empower participants. To ensure studies optimise participation and learning of older adults when developing EHTs, there is a need to place more emphasis on the approaches promoting mutual learning.
Prospero Registration Number: CRD42021240013.
Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared.
(© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)
