Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

A Comparative Analysis of Bioeconomy Development in European Union Countries.

Tytuł:
A Comparative Analysis of Bioeconomy Development in European Union Countries.
Autorzy:
Dolge K; Riga Technical University, Faculty of Electrical and Environmental Engineering, Institute of Energy Systems and Environment, Azenes street 12/K1, LV-1048, Riga, Latvia. .
Balode L; Riga Technical University, Faculty of Electrical and Environmental Engineering, Institute of Energy Systems and Environment, Azenes street 12/K1, LV-1048, Riga, Latvia. lauma.balode_.
Laktuka K; Riga Technical University, Faculty of Electrical and Environmental Engineering, Institute of Energy Systems and Environment, Azenes street 12/K1, LV-1048, Riga, Latvia. .
Kirsanovs V; Riga Technical University, Faculty of Electrical and Environmental Engineering, Institute of Energy Systems and Environment, Azenes street 12/K1, LV-1048, Riga, Latvia. .
Barisa A; Riga Technical University, Faculty of Electrical and Environmental Engineering, Institute of Energy Systems and Environment, Azenes street 12/K1, LV-1048, Riga, Latvia. .
Kubule A; Riga Technical University, Faculty of Electrical and Environmental Engineering, Institute of Energy Systems and Environment, Azenes street 12/K1, LV-1048, Riga, Latvia. .
Źródło:
Environmental management [Environ Manage] 2023 Feb; Vol. 71 (2), pp. 215-233. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Dec 01.
Typ publikacji:
Comparative Study; Journal Article
Język:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Publication: New York Ny : Springer Verlag
Original Publication: New York, Springer-Verlag.
MeSH Terms:
Biotechnology*
Economic Development*
European Union ; Finland ; Spain
References:
Singh A, Christensen T, Panoutsou C (2021) Policy review for biomass value chains in the European bioeconomy. Global Transitions 3:13–42.
Blumberga D, Muizniece I, Zihare L, Sniega L (2017) Bioeconomy mapping indicators and methodology. Case study about forest sector in Latvia. Energy Procedia 128:363–367. (PMID: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.053)
Directorate-General for Research and Innovation (2022) EU Bioeconomy strategy progress report. https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/news/all-researchand-innovation-news/adoption-bioeconomy-strategy-progress-report-2022-06-09_en.
Martinez‑Hernandez E, Sadhukhan J, Aburto J, Amezcua‑Allieri MA, Morse S, Murphy R (2022) Modelling to analyse the process and sustainability performance of forestry‑based bioenergy systems. Clean Techn Environ Policy ume 24:1709–1725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-022-02278-1 . FebruaryPages. (PMID: 10.1007/s10098-022-02278-1)
European Commission (2012) Bioeconomy strategy “Innovating for sustainable growth - A bioeconomy for Europe”. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/1f0d8515-8dc0-4435-ba53-9570e47dbd51.
European Commission (2018a) Communication COM/2018/673: a sustainable Bioeconomy for Europe: Strengthening the connection between economy, society and the environment. https://knowledge4policy.ec.europa.eu/publication/sustainable-bioeconomy-europestrengthening-connection-between-economy-society_en.
European Commission (2018b) The European way to use our natural resources: action plan. https://knowledge4policy.ec.europa.eu/publication/bioeconomy-european-way-use-ournatural-resources-action-plan-2018_en.
European Commission (2019) Communication from the Commission, The European Green Deal. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2019%3A640%3AFIN.
European Commission (2020) Knowledge Centre for Bioeconomy, EU Bioeconomy Monitoring System. https://knowledge4policy.ec.europa.eu/bioeconomy/monitoring_en . Accessed November 2022.
European Commission, Composite Indicators (2020). https://joint-research-centre.ec.europa.eu/scientific-activities/composite-indicators_en.
Woźniak E, Tyczewska A, Twardowski T (2022) Bioeconomy development factors in the European Union and Poland. N Biotechnol 60:2–8. (PMID: 10.1016/j.nbt.2020.07.004)
Diaz F, Koiro L, Romagnoli F (2022) Environmental and economic life cycle evaluation of potential energy efficiency measures on Latvian fish supply chain. Fut Foods 6: 100203.
Fava F, Gardossi L, Brigidi P, Morone P, Carosi DAR, Lenzi A (2021) The bioeconomy in Italy and the new national strategy for a more competitive and sustainable country. N Biotechnol 61:124–136. (PMID: 10.1016/j.nbt.2020.11.009)
Federal Ministry for Sustainability and Tourism (2019) Bioeconomy a strategy for Austria. https://www.bmbwf.gv.at/en/Topics/Research/Research-in-Austria/Strategic-focus-and-advisory-bodies/Strategies/Bioeconomy-Strategy.html.
French Government (2017) A Bioeconomy strategy for France. https://agriculture.gouv.fr/telecharger/84625?token=916703403ccda239d9695d36db8bf3b3cef47691df7dcd9e9a95301c30b97dc6.
Government of Ireland (2018) National policy statement on the Bioeconomy.
Hryhoruk P, Khrushch N, Grygoruk S (2019) An approach to design a composite index of economic development and identifying the bounds of its levels. In: 9th International Conference on Advanced Computer Information Technologies (ACIT), IEEE, Czech Republic, pp. 48–51.
Edmonds HK, Lovell JE, Lovell CAK (2020) A new composite climate change vulnerability index. Ecol Indic 117, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106529.
Italian Government (2017) Bioeconomy in Italy (BIT). https://cnbbsv.palazzochigi.it/media/1768/bit1_en.pdf.
D’Adamo I, Falcone PM, Morone P (2020) A new socio-economic indicator to measure the performance of bioeconomy sectors in Europe. Ecol Econ 176:106724. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106724)
Dolge K, Kubule A, Blumberga D (2020) Composite index for energy efficiency evaluation of industrial sector: sub-sectoral comparison. Environ Sustain Indic 8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2020.100062.
Bogner K, Dahlke J (2022) Born to transform? German bioeconomy policy and research projects for transformations towards sustainability. Ecol Econ 195:107366. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107366)
Runge K, Blumberga A, Blumberga D (2017) Bioeconomy growth in latvia. System-dynamics model for high-value added products in fisheries. Energy Procedia 113:339–345. (PMID: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.04.075)
Zihare L, Kubule A, Vamza I, Muizniece I, Blumberga D (2021) Bioeconomy triple factor nexus through indicator analysis. N. Biotechnology 61:57–68. (PMID: 10.1016/j.nbt.2020.11.008)
Kardung M, Drabik D (2021) Full speed ahead or floating around? Dynamics of selected circular bioeconomies in Europe. Ecol Econ 188:107146. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107146)
Madurai Elavarasan R, Pugazhendhi R, Irfan M, Mihet-Popa L, Campana PE, Khan IA (2022) A novel Sustainable Development Goal 7 composite index as the paradigm for energy sustainability assessment: a case study from Europe. Appl Energy 307 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118173.
Marcone RD, Schmid M, Meylan G (2022) Closing the gap between EU-wide national bioeconomy monitoring frameworks and urban circular bioeconomy development. J Clean Prod 379:134563. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134563)
Ministry of Agriculture (2018) Latvian Bioeconomy Strategy 2030. https://www.zm.gov.lv/public/files/CMS_Static_Page_Doc/00/00/01/46/58/E2758-LatvianBioeconomyStrategy2030.pdf.
Ministry of Economic Affairs and Climate Policy (2018) The position of the bioeconomy in the Netherlands. https://www.nweurope.eu/media/4663/180369_biobase4sme_2luik_netherlands_v4_lr.pdf.
Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment of Finland, Sustainable Growth from Bioeconomy (2014) The Finnish Bioeconomy Strategy. https://biotalous.fi/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/The_Finnish_Bioeconomy_Strategy_110620141.pdf.
Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (2016) The Spanish Bioeconomy Strategy - 2030 Horizon. http://bioeconomia.chil.me/download-doc/102157.
O’Brien M, Wechsler D, Bringezu S, Schaldach R (2017) Toward a systemic monitoring of the European bioeconomy: gaps, needs and the integration of sustainability indicators and targets for global land use. Land Use Policy 66:162–171. (PMID: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.04.047)
Calicioglu Ö, Bogdanski A (2021) Linking the bioeconomy to the 2030 sustainable development agenda: Can SDG indicators be used to monitor progress towards a sustainable bioeconomy? New. Biotechnology 61:40–49.
Republic French (2015) A Bioeconomy Strategy for France. Goals, issues and forward vision. https://agriculture.gouv.fr/telecharger/88386?token=79e3c5ca03d4eeda8331c545e91f3891547a8e64fbc90b3c04695307080af798.
Robert N, Giuntoli J, Dos Santos Fernandes De Araujo R, Avraamides M, Balzi E, Barredo Cano JI, Baruth B, Becker WE, Borzacchiello MT, Bulgheroni C, Camia A, Fiore G, Follador M, Gurria Albusac P, La Notte A, Lusser M, Marelli L, M’barek R, Parisi C, Philippidis G, Ronzon T, Sala S, Sanchez Lopez J, Mubareka S (2020) Development of a bioeconomy monitoring framework for the European Union: an integrative and collaborative approach. N Biotechnol 59:10–19. (PMID: 10.1016/j.nbt.2020.06.001)
Ronzona T, Iost S, Philippidis G (2022) An output-based measurement of EU bioeconomy services: marrying statistics with policy insight. Struct Change Economic Dyn 60:290–301. pages. (PMID: 10.1016/j.strueco.2021.10.005)
The Federal Government (2020) National Bioeconomy Strategy. https://knowledge4policy.ec.europa.eu/publication/german-national-bioeconomystrategy_en.
Ferreira V, Fabregat-Aibar L, Terceño A (2022) Research trends and hotspots in bioeconomy impact analysis: a study of economic, social and environmental impacts. Environ Impact Assess Rev 96:106842. (PMID: 10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106842)
Jander W, Grundmann P (2019) Monitoring the transition towards a bioeconomy: a general framework and a specific indicator. J Clean Prod 236:117564. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.039)
Wei X, Liu Q, Pu A, Wang S, Feifei Chena Lei Zhang Yong Zhang, Dong Z, Wan X (2022) Knowledge mapping of bioeconomy: a bibliometric analysis. J Clean Prod 373:133824. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133824)
Contributed Indexing:
Keywords: Bioeconomy; Circular economy; European Green Deal; Indicators; Multi-criteria
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20221201 Date Completed: 20230206 Latest Revision: 20230413
Update Code:
20240105
DOI:
10.1007/s00267-022-01751-3
PMID:
36456655
Czasopismo naukowe
Knowledge-based and innovative bioeconomy is a cornerstone for achieving the goals of the European Green Deal. Due to its comprehensive coverage, bioeconomy performance is challenging to assess unambiguously. This paper presents the results of a cross-country comparison of 22 EU countries applying the Complex Bioeconomy Sustainability Index for 2012-2018. Results were compared with results of the TOPSIS multi-criteria decision-making method on national bioeconomy strategies in Finland, France, Spain, Italy, Ireland, and Latvia. The research aims to combine a quantitative assessment of bioeconomy output indicators with a qualitative evaluation of bioeconomy strategies of EU Member States.
(© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies