Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

Machine learning-driven clinical decision support system for concept-based searching: a field trial in a Norwegian hospital.

Tytuł:
Machine learning-driven clinical decision support system for concept-based searching: a field trial in a Norwegian hospital.
Autorzy:
Berge GT; Department of Information Systems, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.; Department of Technology and eHealth, Sørlandet Hospital Trust, Kristiansand, Norway.
Granmo OC; Department of ICT, University of Agder, Grimstad, Norway.
Tveit TO; Department of Technology and eHealth, Sørlandet Hospital Trust, Kristiansand, Norway.; Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Sørlandet Hospital Trust, Kristiansand, Norway.; Research Department, Sørlandet Hospital Trust, Kristiansand, Norway.
Munkvold BE; Department of Information Systems, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.
Ruthjersen AL; Department of Technology and eHealth, Sørlandet Hospital Trust, Kristiansand, Norway.
Sharma J; Department of Technology and eHealth, Sørlandet Hospital Trust, Kristiansand, Norway. .; Department of ICT, University of Agder, Grimstad, Norway. .
Źródło:
BMC medical informatics and decision making [BMC Med Inform Decis Mak] 2023 Jan 10; Vol. 23 (1), pp. 5. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Jan 10.
Typ publikacji:
Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Język:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Original Publication: London : BioMed Central, [2001-
MeSH Terms:
Decision Support Systems, Clinical*
Hypersensitivity*
Humans ; Electronic Health Records ; Machine Learning ; Hospitals
References:
Inform Health Soc Care. 2017 Mar;42(2):135-152. (PMID: 26890621)
Int J Med Inform. 2013 Oct;82(10):940-53. (PMID: 23827768)
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2012;2012:997-1003. (PMID: 23304375)
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Oct;42(5):923-36. (PMID: 19646551)
J Med Syst. 2012 Dec;36(6):3677-84. (PMID: 22402980)
World J Gastroenterol. 2008 Jan 28;14(4):563-8. (PMID: 18203288)
J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2013 Dec;4(Suppl 1):S73-7. (PMID: 24347988)
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Sep-Oct;20(5):947-53. (PMID: 23703825)
Radiology. 2016 May;279(2):329-43. (PMID: 27089187)
J Clin Bioinforma. 2015 Mar 26;5:4. (PMID: 25834725)
Arch Intern Med. 2003 Jun 23;163(12):1409-16. (PMID: 12824090)
N Engl J Med. 2012 Jun 14;366(24):2240-2. (PMID: 22693995)
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Sep-Oct;18(5):552-6. (PMID: 21685143)
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Sep-Oct;20(5):859-66. (PMID: 23605114)
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Apr;21(4):337-46. (PMID: 22328458)
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Oct;14(48):1-227. (PMID: 21034668)
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2002 Apr 20;122(10):1018-20. (PMID: 15984103)
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Sep-Oct;17(5):563-7. (PMID: 20819865)
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Sep 22;17(1):138. (PMID: 28938900)
PLoS Biol. 2005 Feb;3(2):e65. (PMID: 15719064)
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006 Feb 01;6:6. (PMID: 16451720)
Int J Med Inform. 2012 Mar;81(3):157-65. (PMID: 22204897)
Yearb Med Inform. 2008;:128-44. (PMID: 18660887)
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013 Jan 29;13:16. (PMID: 23360305)
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Jul 3;157(1):29-43. (PMID: 22751758)
J Biomed Inform. 2012 Feb;45(1):129-40. (PMID: 22085698)
Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2013 Mar;51(1):22-7. (PMID: 23711602)
Appl Clin Inform. 2016 Nov 09;7(4):1051-1068. (PMID: 27826610)
BMJ. 1998 Apr 18;316(7139):1236-8. (PMID: 9553006)
BMJ. 1999 Apr 10;318(7189):984-90. (PMID: 10195972)
Methods Inf Med. 2015;54(4):338-45. (PMID: 25833655)
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 24;12(2):e0173021. (PMID: 28235017)
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2014 Nov 14;2014:580-8. (PMID: 25954363)
Fam Pract. 2008 Jun;25(3):162-7. (PMID: 18504253)
BMJ. 2005 Apr 2;330(7494):765. (PMID: 15767266)
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Oct;42(5):760-72. (PMID: 19683066)
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Sep-Oct;19(5):913-6. (PMID: 22291166)
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 May 1;20(3):489-93. (PMID: 23011124)
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 May 1;18(3):327-34. (PMID: 21422100)
Hum Factors. 2010 Jun;52(3):381-410. (PMID: 21077562)
PLoS Med. 2011 Jan 18;8(1):e1000387. (PMID: 21267058)
Stud Health Technol Inform. 1997;43 Pt B:781-5. (PMID: 10179774)
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Jul;24(7):417-22. (PMID: 26092566)
J Biomed Inform. 2018 Jan;77:34-49. (PMID: 29162496)
Appl Ergon. 2015 Nov;51:291-321. (PMID: 26154228)
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Sep-Oct;18(5):544-51. (PMID: 21846786)
Grant Information:
241277 Norwegian Research Council
Contributed Indexing:
Keywords: Clinical decision support systems; Electronic health record; Machine learning; Natural language processing; Technology acceptance; UTAUT
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20230110 Date Completed: 20230112 Latest Revision: 20230206
Update Code:
20240105
PubMed Central ID:
PMC9832658
DOI:
10.1186/s12911-023-02101-x
PMID:
36627624
Czasopismo naukowe
Background: Natural language processing (NLP) based clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) have demonstrated the ability to extract vital information from patient electronic health records (EHRs) to facilitate important decision support tasks. While obtaining accurate, medical domain interpretable results is crucial, it is demanding because real-world EHRs contain many inconsistencies and inaccuracies. Further, testing of such machine learning-based systems in clinical practice has received limited attention and are yet to be accepted by clinicians for regular use.
Methods: We present our results from the evaluation of an NLP-driven CDSS developed and implemented in a Norwegian Hospital. The system incorporates unsupervised and supervised machine learning combined with rule-based algorithms for clinical concept-based searching to identify and classify allergies of concern for anesthesia and intensive care. The system also implements a semi-supervised machine learning approach to automatically annotate medical concepts in the narrative.
Results: Evaluation of system adoption was performed by a mixed methods approach applying The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) as a theoretical lens. Most of the respondents demonstrated a high degree of system acceptance and expressed a positive attitude towards the system in general and intention to use the system in the future. Increased detection of patient allergies, and thus improved quality of practice and patient safety during surgery or ICU stays, was perceived as the most important advantage of the system.
Conclusions: Our combined machine learning and rule-based approach benefits system performance, efficiency, and interpretability. The results demonstrate that the proposed CDSS increases detection of patient allergies, and that the system received high-level acceptance by the clinicians using it. Useful recommendations for further system improvements and implementation initiatives are reducing the quantity of alarms, expansion of the system to include more clinical concepts, closer EHR system integration, and more workstations available at point of care.
(© 2023. The Author(s).)
Zaloguj się, aby uzyskać dostęp do pełnego tekstu.

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies