Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

Identifying bureaus with substantial personnel change during the Trump administration: A Bayesian approach.

Tytuł:
Identifying bureaus with substantial personnel change during the Trump administration: A Bayesian approach.
Autorzy:
Libgober B; Department of Political Science, Northwestern University, Evanstan, Illinois, United States of America.
Richardson MD; Department of Government, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.
Źródło:
PloS one [PLoS One] 2023 Jan 18; Vol. 18 (1), pp. e0278458. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Jan 18 (Print Publication: 2023).
Typ publikacji:
Journal Article
Język:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science
MeSH Terms:
United States Government Agencies*
Politics*
United States ; Bayes Theorem ; Masks ; Probability
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20230118 Date Completed: 20230120 Latest Revision: 20230315
Update Code:
20240104
PubMed Central ID:
PMC9847970
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0278458
PMID:
36652432
Czasopismo naukowe
Presidents and executive branch agencies often have adversarial relationships. Early accounts suggest that these antagonisms may have been deeper and broader under President Trump than under any recent President. Yet careful appraisals have sometimes shown that claims about what President Trump has done to government and politics are over-stated, require greater nuance, or are just plain wrong. In this article, we use federal employment records from the Office of Personnel Management to examine rates of entry and exit at agencies across the executive branch during President Trump's term. A key challenge in this endeavor is that agencies vary in size dramatically, and this variability makes direct comparisons of rates of entry and exit across agencies problematic. Small agencies are overrepresented among agencies with large and small rates. Yet small agencies do important work and cannot simply be ignored. To address such small-area issues, we use a Bayesian hierarchical model to generate size-adjusted rates that better reflect the fundamental uncertainty about what is happening in small agencies as well as the substantial likelihood that these entities are less unusual than raw statistics imply. Our analysis of these adjusted rates leads to three key findings. First, total employment at the end of the Trump administration was largely unchanged from where it began in January of 2017. Second, this aggregate stability masks significant variation across departments, with immigration-focused bureaus and veterans-affairs bureaus growing significantly and certain civil-rights focused bureaus exhibiting signs of stress. Finally, compared to the first terms of Presidents Bush and Obama, separation rates under President Trump were markedly higher for most agencies.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
(Copyright: © 2023 Libgober, Richardson. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)
Zaloguj się, aby uzyskać dostęp do pełnego tekstu.

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies