Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Przeglądasz jako GOŚĆ
Tytuł pozycji:

Determining hormone metabolite concentrations when enzyme immunoassay accuracy varies over time.

Tytuł :
Determining hormone metabolite concentrations when enzyme immunoassay accuracy varies over time.
Autorzy :
Davidian, Eve
Benhaiem, Sarah
Courtiol, Alexandre
Hofer, Heribert
Höner, Oliver P.
Dehnhard, Martin
Fisher, Diana
Pokaż więcej
Temat :
ENZYME-linked immunosorbent assay
HORMONES
METABOLITES
QUANTITATIVE research
ECOLOGY
CLUSTER analysis (Statistics)
Źródło :
Methods in Ecology & Evolution; May2015, Vol. 6 Issue 5, p576-583, 8p
Czasopismo naukowe
Enzyme immunoassays ( EIAs) are widely used to quantify concentrations of hormone metabolites. Modifications in laboratory conditions may affect the accuracy of metabolite concentration measurements and lead to misinterpretations when results of different accuracy are combined for a statistical analysis. This issue is of great relevance to studies in behavioural and evolutionary ecology because these usually aim at understanding how hormone concentrations vary between individuals, environments or experimental conditions., We present a method based on re-assaying a subset of samples to standardize hormone metabolite concentrations when changes in EIA accuracy occur. We used glucocorticoid metabolite concentrations ( fGMCs) measured in faeces of spotted hyaenas ( Crocuta crocuta) between 2011 and 2013 with a previously validated EIA. Changes in accuracy were assessed by monitoring the metabolite concentration of faecal control 'pools' that were systematically assayed with faecal samples. A cluster analysis on these pools identified two distinct sample sets with different EIA accuracy; 'Cluster 1' and 'Cluster 2'. We then re-assayed all samples of Cluster 1 ( n = 138) with an EIA accuracy similar to that of Cluster 2 and fitted a linear regression to the remeasured fGMCs against the initial fGMCs to predict fGMCs in Cluster 2. To determine the minimum number of samples to re-assay that allows reliable predictions, we assessed the variation in the quality of model predictions by fitting linear regressions on decreasing numbers of re-assayed samples. This revealed that re-assaying 27 samples would be sufficient to generate reliable predictions considering our data set., To test the robustness of our method, we fitted a new linear regression to 27 randomly chosen samples and used its equation to standardize all fGMCs of Cluster 1. The standardized fGMCs were similar to the remeasured fGMCs, and the regression on 27 samples was as effective at standardizing fGMCs as the regression fitted on the complete data set., Our standardization method permits the combination of results of different accuracy. It is a simple and reliable alternative to the costly, time-consuming and often impractical re-assaying of complete sample sets that can be applied to a wide variety of species and sample types. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Methods in Ecology & Evolution is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies