Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

Nicorandil Versus Nitroglycerin for Symptomatic Relief of Angina in Patients With Slow Coronary Flow Phenomenon: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Tytuł:
Nicorandil Versus Nitroglycerin for Symptomatic Relief of Angina in Patients With Slow Coronary Flow Phenomenon: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Autorzy:
Sani, Hashem Danesh
Eshraghi, Ali
Nezafati, Mohammad Hassan
Vojdanparast, Mohammad
Shahri, Bahram
Nezafati, Pouya
Temat:
NICORANDIL
NICOTINAMIDE
THERAPEUTIC use of nitroglycerin
ANGINA pectoris
CHEST pain
Źródło:
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology & Therapeutics; Jul2015, Vol. 20 Issue 4, p401-406, 6p
Czasopismo naukowe
Objective: Patients with the coronary slow flow phenomenon frequently experience angina episodes. The present study aimed to compare the efficacy of nicorandil versus nitroglycerin for alleviation of angina symptoms in slow flow patients. Methods: In a single-center, single-blind, parallel-design, comparator-controlled, randomized clinical trial (NCT02254252), 54 patients with slow flow and normal or near-normal coronary angiography who presented with frequent angina episodes were randomly assigned to 1-month treatment with nicorandil 10 mg, 2 times a day (n ¼ 27) or sustained-release glyceryltrinitrate 6.4 mg 2 times a day (n ¼27). Frequency of angina episodes, pain intensity, and the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) grading of angina pectoris were assessed at baseline and after 1 month of treatment. Results: In all, 25 patients in the nicorandil arm and 24 patients in the nitroglycerin arm were analyzed. After 1 month, patients treated with nicorandil had fewer angina episodes (adjusted mean number of episodes per week, nicorandil versus nitroglycerin; 1.68+0.15 vs 2.29+0.15, P ¼ .007, effect size ¼ 14.6%). Patients also reported greater reductions in pain intensity with nicorandil versus nitroglycerin (adjusted mean of self-reported pain score; 3.03+0.29 vs 3.89+0.30, P ¼ .046, effect size ¼ 8.4%). A significantly higher proportion of patients in the nicorandil arm were categorized in CCS class I (76% vs 33.3%, P ¼ .004) or class II (16.0% vs 45.8%, P ¼ .032). Conclusion: In slow flow patients, nicorandil provides better symptomatic relief of angina than nitroglycerin. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]
Copyright of Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology & Therapeutics is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies