Dear user, the application need JavaScript support. Please enable JavaScript in your browser.

Title of the item:

What Pacemakers Can Teach Us about the Ethics of Maintaining Artificial Organs.

What Pacemakers Can Teach Us about the Ethics of Maintaining Artificial Organs.
Hutchison, Katrina
Sparrow, Robert
Subject Terms:
CARDIAC pacemakers
CONFLICT of interests
ELECTRONIC security systems
PROPRIETARY health facilities
MEDICAL policy
GOVERNMENT regulation
SOFTWARE architecture
Hastings Center Report; Nov/Dec2016, Vol. 46 Issue 6, p14-24, 11p, 1 Chart
Academic Journal
One day soon it may be possible to replace a failing heart, liver, or kidney with a long-lasting mechanical replacement or perhaps even with a 3-D printed version based on the patient's own tissue. Such artificial organs could make transplant waiting lists and immunosuppression a thing of the past. Supposing that this happens, what will the ongoing care of people with these implants involve? In particular, how will the need to maintain the functioning of artificial organs over an extended period affect patients and their doctors and the responsibilities of those who manufacture such devices? Drawing on lessons from the history of the cardiac pacemaker, this article offers an initial survey of the ethical issues posed by the need to maintain and service artificial organs. We briefly outline the nature and history of cardiac pacemakers, with a particular focus on the need for technical support, maintenance, and replacement of these devices. Drawing on the existing medical literature and on our conversations and correspondence with cardiologists, regulators, and manufacturers, we describe five sources of ethical issues associated with pacemaker maintenance: the location of the devices inside the human body, such that maintenance generates surgical risks; the complexity of the devices, which increases the risk of harms to patients as well as introducing potential injustices in access to treatment; the role of software-particularly software that can be remotely accessed-in the functioning of the devices, which generates privacy and security issues; the impact of continual development and improvement of the device; and the influence of commercial interests in the context of a medical device market in which there are several competing products. Finally, we offer some initial suggestions as to how these questions should be answered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Hastings Center Report is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Please log in to access the full text.

We use cookies to help identify your computer so we can tailor your user experience, track shopping basket contents and remember where you are in the order process.


Your views are very important to us and can be enormously helpful in showing us where we can make improvements. We'd be very grateful if you would spend a few minutes completing the short form.

Feedback form