Information

Dear user, the application need JavaScript support. Please enable JavaScript in your browser.

You are browsing as a GUEST
Title of the item:

European repository of explicit criteria of potentially inappropriate medications in old age.

Title :
European repository of explicit criteria of potentially inappropriate medications in old age.
Authors :
Ivanova, Ivana
Elseviers, Monique
Wauters, Maarten
Christiaens, Thierry
Vander Stichele, Robert
Show more
Subject Terms :
DRUGS
INFORMATION storage & retrieval systems -- Medical care
MEDICAL history taking
PHARMACY information services
SEVERITY of illness index
MEDICATION therapy management
ELECTRONIC health records
INAPPROPRIATE prescribing (Medicine)
Source :
Geriatrics & Gerontology International; Aug2018, Vol. 18 Issue 8, p1293-1297, 5p
Geographic Terms :
EUROPE
Academic Journal
Aim: Lack of electronic assessment of medication lists in electronic health records is a barrier for more generalized use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIM) lists, designed for older adults. The aim was to construct a European repository of explicit criteria on PIM, suitable for electronic assessment. Methods: PIM description, medication information, clinical information and level of evidence was entered. Criteria with unclear medication specifications were excluded. Too complex criteria were divided for more operable use. Results: We selected three lists: the European Union (7)-PIM (2015), STOPP/START (2014) and Beers criteria (2015). After exclusion and division, from 641 original criteria of the three PIM-lists, a total of 650 criteria were entered (n = 282 from European Union (7)-PIM, n = 201 from Beers and n = 167 from the STOPP/START list). Identification of the medication was possible with the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification System for practically all criteria, except for 23 (3.5%). From all criteria, 63.9% required only medication-related information. In 55.7% of the criteria, identification of the active substance(s) was the only medication data requirement and 8.2% required additional information (dose, duration, route of administration). From all criteria, 36.1% required clinical information, from which 17.8% requested disease information only, and 18.3% required additional information (indication, history of diseases, laboratory results or severity of diseases). Conclusions: It was feasible to enter most of the original criteria of the three PIM lists into a repository of electronically applicable criteria. In the future, developers of new PIM lists should take into account semantic interoperability and consider the suitability of the criteria for electronic use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Geriatrics & Gerontology International is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

We use cookies to help identify your computer so we can tailor your user experience, track shopping basket contents and remember where you are in the order process.