Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

A Comparison of Excisional Volume Loss Calculation Methods to Predict Functional Outcome After Partial Nephrectomy.

Tytuł:
A Comparison of Excisional Volume Loss Calculation Methods to Predict Functional Outcome After Partial Nephrectomy.
Autorzy:
Beksac, Alp Tuna
Shah, Qainat N.
Paulucci, David J.
Lewis, Sara
Taouli, Bachir
Badani, Ketan K.
Temat:
NEPHRECTOMY
CROSS-sectional imaging
GLOMERULAR filtration rate
RANK correlation (Statistics)
LINEAR statistical models
REGRESSION analysis
Źródło:
Journal of Endourology; Jan2019, Vol. 33 Issue 1, p35-41, 7p
Czasopismo naukowe
Introduction: Functional volume loss (FVL) is a significant predictor of kidney function decline after partial nephrectomy (PN). Here, we sought to assess two different methods for quantifying FVL post-PN: imaging-based tissue segmentation (TS) vs pathological analysis. Methods and Results: From a single surgeon series, we performed a retrospective analysis of 42 patients who underwent PN for a cT1 renal mass between 2015 and 2017. The association between TS and pathological analysis at a median follow-up of 6 months (range: 3–9 months) was evaluated using Spearman's correlation. The association between pathological analysis, TS analysis, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline at 6 months was evaluated using a multivariable linear mixed-effects models. For pathological analysis, dimensions of the specimen and tumor were extracted from pathology reports. FVL was calculated as [specimen volume (Length*Width*Height*π/6) − tumor volume (Length*Width*Height* π/6)]. For TS analysis, preoperative cross-sectional imaging was used (MRI n = 20; CT n = 22). FVL was calculated as [(overall kidney volume) − (tumor volume) − (cyst volume of renal cysts >1 cm)]. Postoperative functional volume was subtracted from preoperative functional volume to assess FVL post-PN for TS method. Results: eGFR significantly decreased from baseline to postoperative 6 months (−5.1 mL/min/1.73 m2; p = 0.004). Even though there was a correlation between the two methods (coefficient = 0.245, p < 0.001), pathological analysis underestimated volume loss (32.2 mL vs 5.76 mL, p < 0.001). In multivariate linear regression analysis, TS analysis was significantly associated with a decline in eGFR (β = 0.084, 95% CI = −0.02, 0.15; p = 0.012), whereas pathological analysis was not (β = 0.02, 95% CI = −0.24, 0.28; p = 0.87). Conclusion: Pathological analysis underestimates parenchymal volume loss. Only imaging-based TS method is associated with change in eGFR post-PN. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Endourology is the property of Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies