-
Tytuł :
-
Validation of a Novel Multivariate Method of Defining HIV-Associated Cognitive Impairment.
-
Autorzy :
-
Underwood, Jonathan
Francesco, Davide De
Cole, James H
Caan, Matthan W A
Zoest, Rosan A van
Schmand, Ben A
Sharp, David J
Sabin, Caroline A
Reiss, Peter
Winston, Alan
Group, COmorBidity in Relation to AIDS (COBRA) Collaboration and the Pharmacokinetic and clinical Observations in PePle over fiftY (POPPY) Study
- Pokaż więcej
-
Temat :
-
DISABILITIES
BRAIN injuries
NEGLECT (Neurology)
-
Źródło :
-
Open Forum Infectious Diseases; Jun2019, Vol. 6 Issue 6, p1-9, 9p
-
-
Czasopismo naukowe
Background The optimum method of defining cognitive impairment in virally suppressed people living with HIV is unknown. We evaluated the relationships between cognitive impairment, including using a novel multivariate method (NMM), patient– reported outcome measures (PROMs), and neuroimaging markers of brain structure across 3 cohorts. Methods Differences in the prevalence of cognitive impairment, PROMs, and neuroimaging data from the COBRA, CHARTER, and POPPY cohorts (total n = 908) were determined between HIV-positive participants with and without cognitive impairment defined using the HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND), global deficit score (GDS), and NMM criteria. Results The prevalence of cognitive impairment varied by up to 27% between methods used to define impairment (eg, 48% for HAND vs 21% for NMM in the CHARTER study). Associations between objective cognitive impairment and subjective cognitive complaints generally were weak. Physical and mental health summary scores (SF-36) were lowest for NMM-defined impairment (P <.05). There were no differences in brain volumes or cortical thickness between participants with and without cognitive impairment defined using the HAND and GDS measures. In contrast, those identified with cognitive impairment by the NMM had reduced mean cortical thickness in both hemispheres (P <.05), as well as smaller brain volumes (P <.01). The associations with measures of white matter microstructure and brain-predicted age generally were weaker. Conclusion Different methods of defining cognitive impairment identify different people with varying symptomatology and measures of brain injury. Overall, NMM-defined impairment was associated with most neuroimaging abnormalities and poorer self-reported health status. This may be due to the statistical advantage of using a multivariate approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Open Forum Infectious Diseases is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Zaloguj się, aby uzyskać dostęp do pełnego tekstu.