Validation of the Manchester spoken language development scale (MSLDS).

Introduction: Standardized outcome measures are importantfor accurately monitoring the language development of pre-lingually deaf children receiving auditory implants. Current commonly used outcome measures are time-consuming,limiting the practicality of regular testing. To address these limitations, the Manchester Spoken Language Development Scale (MSLDS) was developed as a quick and easily applicable interim measurement. This is an 11-point scale designed to provide a streamlined overview of a child's expressive language development. This study describes the MSLDS, evaluates its ease of use and inter-rater reliability, and outlines its application in the paediatric auditory implant population. Methods: Sixteen speech therapists and teachers for the deaf reviewed videos of paediatric cochlear implant assessmentsand rehabilitation sessions at a UK auditory implant centre. Twenty-five videos from fourteen children were used in this validation study. Reviewers were asked to evaluate a child's language development using the MSLDS by assigning a score for each video and to evaluate the ease of use of the scale. Each video wasrated by three different reviewers. Results: MSLDS scores showed a high degree of consistency between raters for each child. 8/25 (32%) videos demonstrated perfect agreement on the MSLDS. In 15/25 (60%) videos, there was a one-point difference between MSLDS scores. The remaining 2/25 (8%) videos varied by 2 points. Statistical analysis demonstrated an intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.987, indicating a high level of agreement between users of the scale. Qualitative feedback from the raters suggested further modifications which have been incorporated into the scale. Conclusion: The high inter-rater agreement reflects the potential for the MSLDS to be a reliable tool for monitoring language development in the paediatric auditory implant population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Cochlear Implants International: An Interdisciplinary Journal is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)