Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

A new classification for coronal malalignment in adult spinal deformity: a validation and the role of lateral bending radiographs.

Tytuł:
A new classification for coronal malalignment in adult spinal deformity: a validation and the role of lateral bending radiographs.
Autorzy:
Hayashi, Kazunori
Boissière, Louis
Cawley, Derek T.
Larrieu, Daniel
Kieser, David
Berjano, Pedro
Lamartina, Claudio
Gupta, Munich
Silvestre, Clément
Protopsaltis, Themi
Bourghli, Anouar
Pellisé, Ferran
Annis, Prokopis
Papadopoulos, Elias C.
Kreichati, Gaby
Pizones, Javier
Nakamura, Hiroaki
Ames, Christopher P.
Obeid, Ibrahim
Temat:
RADIOGRAPHS
ANATOMICAL planes
HUMAN abnormalities
CLASSIFICATION
DECISION making
Źródło:
European Spine Journal; Sep2020, Vol. 29 Issue 9, p2287-2294, 8p, 2 Color Photographs, 3 Charts
Czasopismo naukowe
Purpose: Coronal malalignment (CM) causes pain, impairment of function and cosmetic problems for adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients in addition to sagittal malalignment. Certain types of CM are at risk of insufficient re-alignment after correction. However, CM has received minimal attention in the literature compared to sagittal malalignment. The purpose was to establish reliability for our recently published classification system of CM in ASD among spine surgeons. Methods: Fifteen readers were assigned 28 cases for classification, who represented CM with reference to their full-length standing anteroposterior and lateral radiographs. The assignment was repeated 2 weeks later, then a third assignment was done with reference to additional side bending radiographs (SBRs). Intra-, inter-rater reliability and contribution of SBRs were determined. Results: Intra-rater reliability was calculated as 0.95, 0.86 and 0.73 for main curve types, subtypes with first modifier, and subtypes with two modifiers respectively. Inter-rater reliability averaged 0.91, 0.75 and 0.52. No differences in intra-rater reliability were shown between the four expert elaborators of the classification and other readers. SBRs helped to increase the concordance rate of second modifiers or changed to appropriate grading in cases graded type A in first modifier. Conclusions: Adequate intra- and inter-rater reliability was shown in the Obeid-CM classification with reference to full spine anteroposterior and lateral radiographs. While side bending radiographs did not improve the classification reliability, they contributed to a better understanding in certain cases. Surgeons should consider both the sagittal and coronal planes, and this system may allow better surgical decision making for CM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of European Spine Journal is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies