Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

Atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with pulmonary lobectomy or pneumectomy: Procedural challenges and efficacy.

Tytuł:
Atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with pulmonary lobectomy or pneumectomy: Procedural challenges and efficacy.
Autorzy:
Fink, Thomas
Sciacca, Vanessa
Heeger, Christian‐Hendrik
Vogler, Julia
Eitel, Charlotte
Reissmann, Bruno
Rottner, Laura
Rillig, Andreas
Mathew, Shibu
Maurer, Tilman
Ouyang, Feifan
Kuck, Karl‐Heinz
Metzner, Andreas
Tilz, Roland Richard
Temat:
ATRIAL fibrillation
CATHETER ablation
CONFIDENCE intervals
PNEUMONECTOMY
PULMONARY veins
RETROSPECTIVE studies
DESCRIPTIVE statistics
Źródło:
Pacing & Clinical Electrophysiology; Oct2020, Vol. 43 Issue 10, p1115-1125, 11p
Terminy geograficzne:
GERMANY
Czasopismo naukowe
Background: Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with pulmonary lobectomy or pneumectomy is challenging due to anatomical alterations. After lung resection, electrically active pulmonary vein (PV) stumps remain and need to be localized for PV isolation (PVI). The present study aims to describe clinical challenges of PVI in patients with pulmonary lobectomy or pneumectomy. Methods: We performed a retrospective study on 19 patients with previous pulmonary lobectomy or pneumectomy undergoing catheter ablation for AF in three German hospitals. Results: Nineteen patients with paroxysmal, persistent, or longstanding‐persistent AF and history of pulmonary lobectomy (n = 11) or pneumectomy (n = 8) were enrolled. Catheter ablation was performed as radiofrequency (RF) ablation using 3D mapping, robotic RF ablation, or by using balloon devices. Decent anatomical changes were observed in patients with lobectomy while cardiac rotation and mediastinal shifting was dominant in patients with pneumectomy. Visualization of all PVs including PV stumps by PV angiography was possible in 10 of 19 patients (52.6%). PV spikes were observed in all identified PV remnants. In nine patients (47.4%), at least one PV remnant could not be identified and electrical isolation was not performed. During 24 months follow‐up, patients with incomplete PVI had a significantly shorter arrhythmia‐free survival than patients with complete PVI (76.2% [95% Confidence interval (CI) 47.2‐100.0%] vs 40.0% [95% CI 5.6‐74.1%], P =.043). Conclusion: In patients with AF and previous lobectomy or pneumectomy, identification and isolation of all PVs are challenging but crucial for ablation success. Additional imaging techniques may be necessary to achieve complete PVI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Pacing & Clinical Electrophysiology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Zaloguj się, aby uzyskać dostęp do pełnego tekstu.

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies